Abstract 4361556: Evaluating Sex-Related Disparities in Cardiovascular Risk Factors and INTERHEART Risk Score Among Asian, African, and Hispanic Communities in Philadelphia, PA

Background: Cardiovascular (CV) diseases significantly contribute to morbidity and mortality in U.S minority communities. However, sex-related disparities within ethnic groups are underexplored. This study examines sex-related differences in CV risk and risk factors among African, Asian, and Hispanic individuals served at Health Promoters (HPs), a network of free preventive health clinics in Philadelphia. Methods: This cross-sectional study (July 2023–February 2025) collected biometric and lifestyle data of a total of 498 people at HPs. Data were securely stored in REDCap and included systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP, DPB), blood glucose (BG), total cholesterol (TC), waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), BMI, and smoking status. INTERHEART Risk Scores (IRS) were calculated and categorized into low (0–9), moderate (10–15), and high (≥16) risk. Chi-square, one-way ANOVA, and Tukey’s HSD tests were used to assess sex and ethnicity based differences. Results: Among 274 females, obesity (BMI ≥30) was most common in Africans (60.8%) and Hispanics (46.7%) but much lower in Asians (11.2%). Asian females had significantly lower average BMI than Hispanic females, who in turn had lower BMI than African females (p<0.001). A high WHR ≥ 0.964 was more frequent in African (17.6%) and Hispanic (18.2%) females. Elevated SBP (≥140 mmHg) was most common in African females (30.1%), followed by Asians (22.1%). BG >200 was seen more in Hispanic females (10%) than in African (5.9%) and Asian (4%) females. Among 224 males, obesity was more frequent in African (41%) and Hispanic (41.4%) males than in Asians (12.4%), and Asian males had a significantly lower average BMI (p<0.001) compared to others. WHR ≥0.964 was most prevalent in African males (34.9%), followed by Asians (34.1%) and Hispanics (32%). Smoking was much less common in African (1.8%) and Asian (11.4%) females than their male counterparts (20.7% and 50%, respectively). IRS ≥16 were most frequent in Hispanic females (36.4%), and more Asian males were in moderate (45.9%) and high risk (30.6%) categories compared to Asian females (34.9% and 16.3%, p=3.16e-04). Conclusion: Significant sex- and ethnicity-related disparities exist in CV risk profiles. These findings underscore the need for culturally tailored, gender-specific CV prevention strategies in underserved minority populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4361556
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4361556: Evaluating Sex-Related Disparities in Cardiovascular Risk Factors and INTERHEART Risk Score Among Asian, African, and Hispanic Communities in Philadelphia, PA

Andren Chen, Peter Clark, A. Wayne McMillen, Darsh Patel et al.
Circulation
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
article

Abstract 4361556: Evaluating Sex-Related Disparities in Cardiovascular Risk Factors and INTERHEART Risk Score Among Asian, African, and Hispanic Communities in Philadelphia, PA

Andren Chen, Peter Clark, A. Wayne McMillen, Darsh Patel, Enwu Liu, Shrikanth Sampath, Sungwook Kim, Adamya Aggarwal, Fredy Abboud
article en

Abstract

Background: Cardiovascular (CV) diseases significantly contribute to morbidity and mortality in U.S minority communities. However, sex-related disparities within ethnic groups are underexplored. This study examines sex-related differences in CV risk and risk factors among African, Asian, and Hispanic individuals served at Health Promoters (HPs), a network of free preventive health clinics in Philadelphia. Methods: This cross-sectional study (July 2023–February 2025) collected biometric and lifestyle data of a total of 498 people at HPs. Data were securely stored in REDCap and included systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP, DPB), blood glucose (BG), total cholesterol (TC), waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), BMI, and smoking status. INTERHEART Risk Scores (IRS) were calculated and categorized into low (0–9), moderate (10–15), and high (≥16) risk. Chi-square, one-way ANOVA, and Tukey’s HSD tests were used to assess sex and ethnicity based differences. Results: Among 274 females, obesity (BMI ≥30) was most common in Africans (60.8%) and Hispanics (46.7%) but much lower in Asians (11.2%). Asian females had significantly lower average BMI than Hispanic females, who in turn had lower BMI than African females (p<0.001). A high WHR ≥ 0.964 was more frequent in African (17.6%) and Hispanic (18.2%) females. Elevated SBP (≥140 mmHg) was most common in African females (30.1%), followed by Asians (22.1%). BG >200 was seen more in Hispanic females (10%) than in African (5.9%) and Asian (4%) females. Among 224 males, obesity was more frequent in African (41%) and Hispanic (41.4%) males than in Asians (12.4%), and Asian males had a significantly lower average BMI (p<0.001) compared to others. WHR ≥0.964 was most prevalent in African males (34.9%), followed by Asians (34.1%) and Hispanics (32%). Smoking was much less common in African (1.8%) and Asian (11.4%) females than their male counterparts (20.7% and 50%, respectively). IRS ≥16 were most frequent in Hispanic females (36.4%), and more Asian males were in moderate (45.9%) and high risk (30.6%) categories compared to Asian females (34.9% and 16.3%, p=3.16e-04). Conclusion: Significant sex- and ethnicity-related disparities exist in CV risk profiles. These findings underscore the need for culturally tailored, gender-specific CV prevention strategies in underserved minority populations.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Mercy Fitzgerald Hospital (US), Saint Joseph's University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.