Abstract 4373591: PREVENT in the 75-and-older population and additional prognostic value of coronary artery calcium: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study

Background: The American Heart Association recently released the Predicting Risk of cardiovascular disease EVENTs (PREVENT) equation for estimating cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk in primary prevention adults aged 30-79. However, its performance in older adults aged 80 years and older is uncertain. Also, the utility of coronary artery calcium (CAC) for CVD prediction improvement beyond PREVENT is unknown. Methods: We studied 1,912 ARIC older adult participants (mean age 80 [SD 4] years) with CAC data but without a history of coronary heart disease (CHD), stroke, and heart failure (HF) at Visit 7 (2018-2019). We first assessed c-statistics and calibration indices of the PREVENT in our older adult population. Then, we compared the predictability between PREVENT and CAC, with total CVD (atherosclerotic CVD [ASCVD, including CHD and stroke] and HF), and all-cause mortality as outcomes of interest, using Cox regression models. Results: Over a median follow-up of 3.7 (IQI 2.6-4.3) years, there were 144 CVD events (81 ASCVD and 75 HF) and 210 deaths. PREVENT demonstrated good calibration (calibration slope 0.74 for total CVD) and discrimination (c-statistic 0.621), and the results were similar in participants aged 80+ vs. those aged 75-79 years. CAC significantly improved prediction of total CVD (0.078 [95% CI 0.034, 0.122]), ASCVD (0.083 [0.026, 0.140]), and HF (0.069 [0.016, 0.123]) beyond PREVENT, but this was not the case for all-cause mortality (left panel of Figure). In contrast, PREVENT improved only the prediction of all-cause mortality beyond CAC (right panel of Figure). The results were largely similar between the age of 80+ vs. 75-79. Conclusions: PREVENT overall performed well even in older adults aged 80+ years. CAC further improved CVD risk prediction beyond and above PREVENT in the-75-and-older adults. Our findings suggest broad usefulness of PREVENT and further support the value of CAC for assessment of primary CVD risk in very older adults.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4373591
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4373591: PREVENT in the 75-and-older population and additional prognostic value of coronary artery calcium: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study

Frances Wang, Michael Joseph Blaha, Yasuyuki Honda, Candace M. Howard et al.
Circulation
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
article

Abstract 4373591: PREVENT in the 75-and-older population and additional prognostic value of coronary artery calcium: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study

Frances Wang, Michael Joseph Blaha, Yasuyuki Honda, Candace M. Howard, Josef Coresh, Aaron R. Folsom, Matthew Jay Budoff, Yejin Mok, Kunihiro Matsushita
article en

Abstract

Background: The American Heart Association recently released the Predicting Risk of cardiovascular disease EVENTs (PREVENT) equation for estimating cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk in primary prevention adults aged 30-79. However, its performance in older adults aged 80 years and older is uncertain. Also, the utility of coronary artery calcium (CAC) for CVD prediction improvement beyond PREVENT is unknown. Methods: We studied 1,912 ARIC older adult participants (mean age 80 [SD 4] years) with CAC data but without a history of coronary heart disease (CHD), stroke, and heart failure (HF) at Visit 7 (2018-2019). We first assessed c-statistics and calibration indices of the PREVENT in our older adult population. Then, we compared the predictability between PREVENT and CAC, with total CVD (atherosclerotic CVD [ASCVD, including CHD and stroke] and HF), and all-cause mortality as outcomes of interest, using Cox regression models. Results: Over a median follow-up of 3.7 (IQI 2.6-4.3) years, there were 144 CVD events (81 ASCVD and 75 HF) and 210 deaths. PREVENT demonstrated good calibration (calibration slope 0.74 for total CVD) and discrimination (c-statistic 0.621), and the results were similar in participants aged 80+ vs. those aged 75-79 years. CAC significantly improved prediction of total CVD (0.078 [95% CI 0.034, 0.122]), ASCVD (0.083 [0.026, 0.140]), and HF (0.069 [0.016, 0.123]) beyond PREVENT, but this was not the case for all-cause mortality (left panel of Figure). In contrast, PREVENT improved only the prediction of all-cause mortality beyond CAC (right panel of Figure). The results were largely similar between the age of 80+ vs. 75-79. Conclusions: PREVENT overall performed well even in older adults aged 80+ years. CAC further improved CVD risk prediction beyond and above PREVENT in the-75-and-older adults. Our findings suggest broad usefulness of PREVENT and further support the value of CAC for assessment of primary CVD risk in very older adults.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Bloomberg (United States) (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), University of Minnesota System (US), University of Mississippi Medical Center (US), Johns Hopkins Hospital (US), New York University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.