Abstract 4360228: Diagnostic Accuracy of the Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index for Predicting Contrast-Induced Nephropathy in Patients With Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Meta-Analysis

Background: Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) is an important cause of morbidity in patients with myocardial infarction (MI) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Although the current guidelines support a multivariable risk assessment, the specific role of systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) remains unclear. This study aims to assess the diagnostic accuracy of the SII in predicting CIN among MI patients undergoing PCI. Methods: Embase, Scopus, and PubMed were systematically searched from inception to April 2025 to identify studies assessing the accuracy of SII in predicting CIN in MI patients (STEMI and NSTEMI) undergoing PCI. Mean differences (MD) were pooled using the inverse variance method under a random-effects model and presented with MD and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using R Studio. Area under the curve (AUC) was pooled using the same approach and reported with 95% CIs using Review Manager v5.4.1. Diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis was performed using Meta-DiSc v2 to present pooled sensitivity and specificity. Results: Six studies including 2,659 NSTEMI patients (CIN=393; no CIN=2,266) and 2,714 STEMI patients (CIN=251; no CIN=2,443) were included. Patients with CIN showed significantly higher SII in NSTEMI (MD: 593.38; 95% CI: 321.55, 865.20; p<0.01) and STEMI (MD: 768.12; 95% CI: 452.94, 1083.31; p<0.01). The AUC of SII was significant for NSTEMI (AUC = 0.80; 95% CI: 0.77, 0.84; p<0.00001) and STEMI (AUC = 0.73; 95% CI: 0.60, 0.85; p<0.00001). Diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis identified SII as a reliable predictor for NSTEMI (sensitivity 77%, 95% CI: 69, 82; specificity 72%, 95% CI: 70, 74) and STEMI (sensitivity 78%, 95% CI: 72, 83; specificity 83%, 95% CI: 76, 88). Conclusion: The SII is a reliable biomarker for predicting CIN in NSTEMI and STEMI patients, showing significant diagnostic accuracy. Integrating SII into existing risk models can improve early risk stratification and guide preventive measures. Future research should validate optimal SII thresholds, explore its dynamic changes around contrast exposure, and evaluate combined use with other biomarkers to enhance personalized CIN risk prediction and management in line with current cardiology guidelines.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4360228
Primary Topic
Inflammatory Biomarkers in Disease Prognosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4360228: Diagnostic Accuracy of the Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index for Predicting Contrast-Induced Nephropathy in Patients With Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Meta-Analysis

Hritvik Jain, Kunal Soni, Tala Altarawneh, Ali Aldamen et al.
Circulation
Inflammatory Biomarkers in Disease Prognosis
article

Abstract 4360228: Diagnostic Accuracy of the Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index for Predicting Contrast-Induced Nephropathy in Patients With Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Meta-Analysis

Hritvik Jain, Kunal Soni, Tala Altarawneh, Ali Aldamen, Basma Badrawy Khalefa, Ramez M. Odat, Bashar M. Al Zoubi, Rahul S. Patel, Siddharth Agrawal
article en

Abstract

Background: Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) is an important cause of morbidity in patients with myocardial infarction (MI) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Although the current guidelines support a multivariable risk assessment, the specific role of systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) remains unclear. This study aims to assess the diagnostic accuracy of the SII in predicting CIN among MI patients undergoing PCI. Methods: Embase, Scopus, and PubMed were systematically searched from inception to April 2025 to identify studies assessing the accuracy of SII in predicting CIN in MI patients (STEMI and NSTEMI) undergoing PCI. Mean differences (MD) were pooled using the inverse variance method under a random-effects model and presented with MD and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using R Studio. Area under the curve (AUC) was pooled using the same approach and reported with 95% CIs using Review Manager v5.4.1. Diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis was performed using Meta-DiSc v2 to present pooled sensitivity and specificity. Results: Six studies including 2,659 NSTEMI patients (CIN=393; no CIN=2,266) and 2,714 STEMI patients (CIN=251; no CIN=2,443) were included. Patients with CIN showed significantly higher SII in NSTEMI (MD: 593.38; 95% CI: 321.55, 865.20; p<0.01) and STEMI (MD: 768.12; 95% CI: 452.94, 1083.31; p<0.01). The AUC of SII was significant for NSTEMI (AUC = 0.80; 95% CI: 0.77, 0.84; p<0.00001) and STEMI (AUC = 0.73; 95% CI: 0.60, 0.85; p<0.00001). Diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis identified SII as a reliable predictor for NSTEMI (sensitivity 77%, 95% CI: 69, 82; specificity 72%, 95% CI: 70, 74) and STEMI (sensitivity 78%, 95% CI: 72, 83; specificity 83%, 95% CI: 76, 88). Conclusion: The SII is a reliable biomarker for predicting CIN in NSTEMI and STEMI patients, showing significant diagnostic accuracy. Integrating SII into existing risk models can improve early risk stratification and guide preventive measures. Future research should validate optimal SII thresholds, explore its dynamic changes around contrast exposure, and evaluate combined use with other biomarkers to enhance personalized CIN risk prediction and management in line with current cardiology guidelines.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Ain Shams University (EG), Jordan University of Science and Technology (JO), Hashemite University (JO), SUNY Upstate Medical University (US), All India Institute of Medical Sciences Jodhpur (IN), CVS Health (United States) (US), Yarmouk University (JO), Marshall University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Inflammatory Biomarkers in Disease Prognosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.