Abstract 4359240: Characteristics and Longer-term Outcomes of Contemporary Patients With Bicuspid Aortic Valve and Concomitant Aortopathy: A Tertiary Care Center Experience
Background: Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is the most common congenital defect affecting 1-2% of general population. It often presents with progressive AV stenosis/regurgitation and ascending aortopathy (AA) which often require surgical intervention. Objective: We sought to report characteristics and long-term outcomes of a contemporary cohort of patients with BAV and concomitant AA. Methods: We included 3782 patients with a documented BAV and an unrepaired AA (≥4 cm) who underwent a clinical evaluation between 1/2010 and 12/2023 at our large tertiary referral center. Patients presenting with acute aortic dissection/rupture as an initial presentation were excluded. Clinical (including aortic surgery/dissection/rupture during follow-up) and imaging data were collected. Primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Results: Characteristics of the patients are shown in Figure 1. At 1±2.2 years from initial evaluation, 2363 (62%) patients underwent surgery (AV repair/replacement [882 {37%}], isolated ascending aortic replacement [402 {17%}] and combined AV+ascending aortic surgery [1079 {46%}]), with 6 (0.25%) in-hospital deaths. Of 2096 AV surgeries, there were 241 (12%) mechanical prostheses, 1326 (63%) bioprosthesis, 16 (1%) homografts, 44 (2%) autografts and 473 (23%) AV repairs. During a mean follow-up of 3.9±3.9 years (range 0-15 years), there were 171 deaths (4.5%), 65 (1.7%) aortic dissections and 4 (0.1%) aortic ruptures. At 1571±1405 days following an evaluation, aortic dissection/rupture occurred in 25/1419 (1.8%) unoperated and 44/2363 (1.9%) operated patients (p=ns). Of these 44 operated patients with dissection, 28 occurred in the distal aorta in those with AA replacement. On survival analysis, longer-term deaths were higher in the unoperated vs. operated patients (71/1419 [5.0%) vs. 100/2363 (4.2%), p-value 0.03, Figure 2). Longer-term deaths were similar in patients undergoing AV repair/replacement (39/843 [4.6%]) vs. isolated AA replacement (20/402 [5.0%]) vs. combined AV+AA surgery (41/1079 [3.8%]), p-value 0.69, Figure 3). Conclusions: In a large contemporary cohort of patients with BAV and AA managed at a high-volume tertiary care center, majority eventually undergo surgery, with a very high longer-term survival and freedom from aortic dissection/rupture. There were no differences in the longer-term survival of patients getting isolated AV or aortic surgery vs. combination AV/aortic surgery.
Authors
- Andrew Gaballa (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0008-8619-3400)
- Milind Y. Desai (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0010-9797)
- Eric E. Roselli (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1533-7987)
- Lars Georg Svensson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5749-4588)
- Ledmar Jovanny Vargas Rodríguez (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6001-5720)
- Shinya Unai (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6844-073X)
- Susan Ospina (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0004-7175-6582)
- Vidyasagar Kalahasti (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3889-5001)
- A. Marc Gillinov (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9410-7543)
- Sadia Sultana (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9582-8868)
- Brian P. Griffin (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6831-8611)
- Shada Jadam (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0005-6175-4775)
- Lifu Deng
- Mohammed Abusafia (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0008-8658-8656)
Institutions
- Cleveland Clinic (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Circulation
- Published
- 2025-11-03
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4359240
- Primary Topic
- Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00