Abstract 4369458: Aortic Length Indexed to Body Surface Area Predicts Mortality in Veterans with Ascending Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm

Background: Aortic diameter is the most consistently referenced index in guidelines for ascending thoracic aortic aneurysm (aTAA) repair. However, studies have shown that diameter alone may not be an optimal predictor of mortality. Growing evidence suggests aortic length may improve risk prediction, particularly for patients with smaller aortic diameters. However, the clinical relevance of aortic length remains unclear. Furthermore, while prior studies suggest that indexing aortic diameter to body size or height improves mortality risk prediction, there is limited evidence evaluating whether the same holds true for aortic length. To address this gap, this study investigates the association between mortality and raw aortic length as well as length indexed to patient height and body surface area (BSA). Methods: 449 veterans with ≥4.0cm aTAA and contrast computed tomography imaging underwent patient-specific three-dimensional reconstruction and retrospective medical record review. Aortic length was measured along the centerline between the aortic annulus and innominate artery. All-cause and aortic-related mortality were assessed using Fine-Gray competing risk regression for raw aortic length, aortic length indexed to height (cm), and aortic length indexed to BSA (using DuBois formula), adjusting for age, aortic diameter, and common aTAA risk factors. Optimal binary cutoffs for length/BSA were identified using maximally selected rank statistics and time-dependent receiver operating characteristic analysis. Results: Neither raw aortic length nor length indexed to height was associated with all-cause or aortic-related mortality. In contrast, length/BSA was significantly associated with all-cause mortality in univariate (p = 0.0014) and multivariate analysis (p = 0.023). Optimal thresholds for length/BSA were 63 cm/m 2 overall, 61 cm/m 2 for five-year mortality, and 67 cm/m 2 for ten-year mortality. Patients above 63 cm/m 2 had significantly reduced survival (p < 0.0001). Conclusion: Aortic length indexed to BSA was an independent predictor of all-cause mortality in this veteran aTAA cohort. These findings suggest that a BSA-based length index may enhance risk stratification when compared to aortic length alone. However, BSA involves weight, which varies over time and may not directly reflect intrinsic aortic pathology. Further clinical and biomechanical study of indexed aortic length values is needed to clarify their role in disease progression and mortality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4369458
Primary Topic
Aortic aneurysm repair treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4369458: Aortic Length Indexed to Body Surface Area Predicts Mortality in Veterans with Ascending Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm

Marko T. Boskovski, Amartya Dave, Elaine E. Tseng, Yixuan Huang et al.
Circulation
Aortic aneurysm repair treatments
article

Abstract 4369458: Aortic Length Indexed to Body Surface Area Predicts Mortality in Veterans with Ascending Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm

Marko T. Boskovski, Amartya Dave, Elaine E. Tseng, Yixuan Huang, Axel Gomez, William Carroway, Yimeng Li, Liang Ge, Shreyas Kiran
article en

Abstract

Background: Aortic diameter is the most consistently referenced index in guidelines for ascending thoracic aortic aneurysm (aTAA) repair. However, studies have shown that diameter alone may not be an optimal predictor of mortality. Growing evidence suggests aortic length may improve risk prediction, particularly for patients with smaller aortic diameters. However, the clinical relevance of aortic length remains unclear. Furthermore, while prior studies suggest that indexing aortic diameter to body size or height improves mortality risk prediction, there is limited evidence evaluating whether the same holds true for aortic length. To address this gap, this study investigates the association between mortality and raw aortic length as well as length indexed to patient height and body surface area (BSA). Methods: 449 veterans with ≥4.0cm aTAA and contrast computed tomography imaging underwent patient-specific three-dimensional reconstruction and retrospective medical record review. Aortic length was measured along the centerline between the aortic annulus and innominate artery. All-cause and aortic-related mortality were assessed using Fine-Gray competing risk regression for raw aortic length, aortic length indexed to height (cm), and aortic length indexed to BSA (using DuBois formula), adjusting for age, aortic diameter, and common aTAA risk factors. Optimal binary cutoffs for length/BSA were identified using maximally selected rank statistics and time-dependent receiver operating characteristic analysis. Results: Neither raw aortic length nor length indexed to height was associated with all-cause or aortic-related mortality. In contrast, length/BSA was significantly associated with all-cause mortality in univariate (p = 0.0014) and multivariate analysis (p = 0.023). Optimal thresholds for length/BSA were 63 cm/m 2 overall, 61 cm/m 2 for five-year mortality, and 67 cm/m 2 for ten-year mortality. Patients above 63 cm/m 2 had significantly reduced survival (p < 0.0001). Conclusion: Aortic length indexed to BSA was an independent predictor of all-cause mortality in this veteran aTAA cohort. These findings suggest that a BSA-based length index may enhance risk stratification when compared to aortic length alone. However, BSA involves weight, which varies over time and may not directly reflect intrinsic aortic pathology. Further clinical and biomechanical study of indexed aortic length values is needed to clarify their role in disease progression and mortality.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
City College of San Francisco (US), San Francisco AIDS Foundation (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Aortic aneurysm repair treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.