Abstract 4367780: Three-Year Outcomes after Deceased Cardiac Donor Heart Transplantation

Background: Deceased cardiac donor (DCD) heart transplantation has recently emerged as a safe and effective alternative to deceased brain donor (DBD) heart transplantation, with the potential to expand access and improve population-level outcomes. Despite the increasing prevalence of DCD transplants, longer-term outcomes beyond the first year are still not well characterized. Research Question: We aimed to examine 3-year outcomes in DCD heart transplantation in a single center cohort. Methods: All patients who underwent DCD or DBD heart transplantation between August 2019 and May 2022 were identified. Baseline donor and recipient demographic variables were collected along with outcome data at three years for overall survival, acute rejection, and cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV). Demographic variables were compared with a student’s T-test for continuous variables and T-test of proportions for categorical variables. Overall survival was compared using a Kaplan-Meier Curve and prevalence of acute rejection and CAV outcomes were compared using a T-test of proportions. Results: Among 125 heart transplants performed, 47.2% (n = 59) were DCD and 52.8% (n = 66) were DBD. 74.2% of all recipients were male. DCD recipients were significantly younger, with a mean ± SD age of 53.4 ± 11.7 years compared to 57.8 ± 10.5 years in DBD recipients (p = 0.03). DCD donors were also significantly younger at 30.4 ± 7.6 years compared to DBD donors at 34.9 ± 11.7 years (p = 0.01) and more likely to be male at 82.4% ± 5.0% compared to 55.6% ± 6.3% of DBD donors (p < 0.01). Overall survival at three years was similar between DCD and DBD recipients (94.7% ± 3.0% vs 92.1% ± 3.4%, p = 0.57). Of surviving patients, 95.7% had follow-up completed through the three-year time point. There were no significant differences between DCD and DBD recipients in three-year rates of CAV (24.5% ± 5.7% vs 23.8% ± 5.4%, p = 0.99) and acute rejection (40.3% ± 6.5% vs 49.2% ± 6.3%, p = 0.43). Conclusions: DCD heart transplantation remains a safe option compared to DBD transplant at the three-year time point in this single-center analysis with similar overall survival, and rates of CAV and acute rejection. Larger studies are still needed to generalize the longer-term efficacy of DCD transplantation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4367780
Primary Topic
Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4367780: Three-Year Outcomes after Deceased Cardiac Donor Heart Transplantation

Rachel Wittenberg, Brian Huang, Akl C. Fahed, Ioannis Mastoris et al.
Circulation
Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
article

Abstract 4367780: Three-Year Outcomes after Deceased Cardiac Donor Heart Transplantation

Rachel Wittenberg, Brian Huang, Akl C. Fahed, Ioannis Mastoris, Boateng Kubi, Greg Lewis, Asishana A. Osho, Bin Yang
article en

Abstract

Background: Deceased cardiac donor (DCD) heart transplantation has recently emerged as a safe and effective alternative to deceased brain donor (DBD) heart transplantation, with the potential to expand access and improve population-level outcomes. Despite the increasing prevalence of DCD transplants, longer-term outcomes beyond the first year are still not well characterized. Research Question: We aimed to examine 3-year outcomes in DCD heart transplantation in a single center cohort. Methods: All patients who underwent DCD or DBD heart transplantation between August 2019 and May 2022 were identified. Baseline donor and recipient demographic variables were collected along with outcome data at three years for overall survival, acute rejection, and cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV). Demographic variables were compared with a student’s T-test for continuous variables and T-test of proportions for categorical variables. Overall survival was compared using a Kaplan-Meier Curve and prevalence of acute rejection and CAV outcomes were compared using a T-test of proportions. Results: Among 125 heart transplants performed, 47.2% (n = 59) were DCD and 52.8% (n = 66) were DBD. 74.2% of all recipients were male. DCD recipients were significantly younger, with a mean ± SD age of 53.4 ± 11.7 years compared to 57.8 ± 10.5 years in DBD recipients (p = 0.03). DCD donors were also significantly younger at 30.4 ± 7.6 years compared to DBD donors at 34.9 ± 11.7 years (p = 0.01) and more likely to be male at 82.4% ± 5.0% compared to 55.6% ± 6.3% of DBD donors (p < 0.01). Overall survival at three years was similar between DCD and DBD recipients (94.7% ± 3.0% vs 92.1% ± 3.4%, p = 0.57). Of surviving patients, 95.7% had follow-up completed through the three-year time point. There were no significant differences between DCD and DBD recipients in three-year rates of CAV (24.5% ± 5.7% vs 23.8% ± 5.4%, p = 0.99) and acute rejection (40.3% ± 6.5% vs 49.2% ± 6.3%, p = 0.43). Conclusions: DCD heart transplantation remains a safe option compared to DBD transplant at the three-year time point in this single-center analysis with similar overall survival, and rates of CAV and acute rejection. Larger studies are still needed to generalize the longer-term efficacy of DCD transplantation.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.