Abstract 4363344: Very High-Risk Coronary Artery Calcium Score Without Excess Epicardial Fat Volume might not be Associated with Significant Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease

Background: Calcium score has been recommended to be utilized in addition to ACC/AHA risk score for optimizing risk category if needed particularly in the intermediate risk group. Also, we have learned that excess epicardial fat volume (EFV) is a major cause of endothelial inflammation and endothelial dysfunction of the coronary arteries which might precede coronary calcification and plaque formation which might result in obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). Purpose: of this study to see whether subject with high coronary calcium score but normal EFV have significant structural and functional abnormalities including obstructive CAD as compared to subjects with high coronary calcium and excess EFV. Methods: 55 asymptomatic subjects and on no medications were screened for cardiovascular risk assessment using the Early Cardiovascular Disease Risk Scoring System (ESCVDRS) known as Rasmussen Risk Score (RRS), previously published. The ESCVDRS includes 7 vascular and 3 cardiac tests. Among the additional test, including fasting blood sugar, lipid profile, CRP and waist circumference were also measured. Coronary artery calcium score (CACS) and epicardial fat volume was measured utilizing cardiac CT Siemens Somatom Definition Dual source CT scanner 64x2.The 55 subjects were divided in 2 groups: Group A (Elevated CACS and elevated EFV) and group B (ELEVATED CACS with normal EFV). All subjects in Group B underwent exercise stress test and/or cardiac catheterization. Results: 1. All subjects in Group B had no significant obstructive CAD, as evidenced by cardiac cath, and/or maximum exercise nuclear stress test. 2. Subjects in group B and not obese have less structural and functional abnormalities including marker for oxidative stress such as CRP. 3. Excess EFV in group A is associated with significant structural and functional abnormalities, as seen in Table. Conclusion: 1. High risk coronary calcium score without excess EFV might not be associated with significant obstructive CAD. 2. Excess EFV is associated with structural and functional abnormalities. 3. Cardio-adiposity is a major risk factor superseding and most likely preceding coronary calcium score formation. Time to focus on epicardial fat volume as the major determinant and arbitrator for cardiovascular risk assessment which should be incorporated in the guidelines with and without coronary calcium score values. Time to include EFV in every CACS report. Early detect to protect!

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4363344
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4363344: Very High-Risk Coronary Artery Calcium Score Without Excess Epicardial Fat Volume might not be Associated with Significant Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease

Antonella Sabatini, Mahfouz ElShahawy
Circulation
Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity
article

Abstract 4363344: Very High-Risk Coronary Artery Calcium Score Without Excess Epicardial Fat Volume might not be Associated with Significant Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease

Antonella Sabatini, Mahfouz ElShahawy
article en

Abstract

Background: Calcium score has been recommended to be utilized in addition to ACC/AHA risk score for optimizing risk category if needed particularly in the intermediate risk group. Also, we have learned that excess epicardial fat volume (EFV) is a major cause of endothelial inflammation and endothelial dysfunction of the coronary arteries which might precede coronary calcification and plaque formation which might result in obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). Purpose: of this study to see whether subject with high coronary calcium score but normal EFV have significant structural and functional abnormalities including obstructive CAD as compared to subjects with high coronary calcium and excess EFV. Methods: 55 asymptomatic subjects and on no medications were screened for cardiovascular risk assessment using the Early Cardiovascular Disease Risk Scoring System (ESCVDRS) known as Rasmussen Risk Score (RRS), previously published. The ESCVDRS includes 7 vascular and 3 cardiac tests. Among the additional test, including fasting blood sugar, lipid profile, CRP and waist circumference were also measured. Coronary artery calcium score (CACS) and epicardial fat volume was measured utilizing cardiac CT Siemens Somatom Definition Dual source CT scanner 64x2.The 55 subjects were divided in 2 groups: Group A (Elevated CACS and elevated EFV) and group B (ELEVATED CACS with normal EFV). All subjects in Group B underwent exercise stress test and/or cardiac catheterization. Results: 1. All subjects in Group B had no significant obstructive CAD, as evidenced by cardiac cath, and/or maximum exercise nuclear stress test. 2. Subjects in group B and not obese have less structural and functional abnormalities including marker for oxidative stress such as CRP. 3. Excess EFV in group A is associated with significant structural and functional abnormalities, as seen in Table. Conclusion: 1. High risk coronary calcium score without excess EFV might not be associated with significant obstructive CAD. 2. Excess EFV is associated with structural and functional abnormalities. 3. Cardio-adiposity is a major risk factor superseding and most likely preceding coronary calcium score formation. Time to focus on epicardial fat volume as the major determinant and arbitrator for cardiovascular risk assessment which should be incorporated in the guidelines with and without coronary calcium score values. Time to include EFV in every CACS report. Early detect to protect!

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Sarasota University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.