Abstract 4366455: Comparison of Patient Demographics between New and Existing Heart Transplant Centers

Introduction: There have been increasing numbers of heart transplants performed yearly in the United States, but significant waitlist times and patient disparities remain. Multiple new transplant centers have started in all OPTN regions, facilitating new transplant listings and leading to broader population access to this life-saving therapy. Research Question: Are there demographic differences in patient populations undergoing transplant at a newly established transplant center compared to existing centers? Methods/Approach: This retrospective study utilized data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR), which include data of all transplant candidates and recipients in the United States. Demographics were compared between the heart transplant centers opened from 2010 to 2023 (referred as “new centers”) at one year after opening and existing centers (continuously open since before 2010) in the same OPTN region in the same year, and cumulatively between all new and existing centers in the country since 2010. Demographic variables included age, gender, race, insurance status, and pre-transplant clinical condition were compared using t-tests and Chi-squared tests. Results: Patients undergoing transplants at new centers were significantly older than those at existing centers, both by mean age (55.5 ± 12.3 vs. 53.3 ± 12.8; p < 0.001) and proportion ≥ 65 years old (26.3% vs. 20.5%; p < 0.001). Cumulatively, there was a higher proportion of Black patients at new centers (28.6% vs. 23.6%; p < 0.001). Patients at new centers were less likely to have private insurance (39.7% vs. 47.6%; p < 0.001) and more likely to be hospitalized in the ICU at time of transplant (59.4% vs. 42.0%; p < 0.001). Other than race, these differences were present both at one year after new center initiation and cumulatively in the entire study time period. Conclusions: Patients undergoing heart transplant at new centers were found to be older, more likely to be Black, less likely to have private insurance, and more likely to be in the ICU at time of transplant compared to existing centers. These differences were present both in the first year after center initiation and cumulatively in the entire study time period, highlighting a persisting variation in population served by new centers. Transplant center initiation may expand access to cardiac transplant to patients who may otherwise have not been considered for this life saving therapy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4366455
Primary Topic
Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4366455: Comparison of Patient Demographics between New and Existing Heart Transplant Centers

Pablo Quintero, Andrew S. Oseran, Rishi K. Wadhera, Alvaro Delgado et al.
Circulation
Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
article

Abstract 4366455: Comparison of Patient Demographics between New and Existing Heart Transplant Centers

Pablo Quintero, Andrew S. Oseran, Rishi K. Wadhera, Alvaro Delgado, A.R. Garan, Lucas Maffioletti Goncalves, Masashi Kai, Amy Xian Zhang, Yusuke Tsukioka, Laura K. Aguilar, L. Fleming, Marwa Sabe, Cara Guardino, Patrick M Hyland, Edward Wilson Grandin, Jenica Upshaw, Cancan Zhang, Jennifer Hui‐Chun Ho
article en

Abstract

Introduction: There have been increasing numbers of heart transplants performed yearly in the United States, but significant waitlist times and patient disparities remain. Multiple new transplant centers have started in all OPTN regions, facilitating new transplant listings and leading to broader population access to this life-saving therapy. Research Question: Are there demographic differences in patient populations undergoing transplant at a newly established transplant center compared to existing centers? Methods/Approach: This retrospective study utilized data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR), which include data of all transplant candidates and recipients in the United States. Demographics were compared between the heart transplant centers opened from 2010 to 2023 (referred as “new centers”) at one year after opening and existing centers (continuously open since before 2010) in the same OPTN region in the same year, and cumulatively between all new and existing centers in the country since 2010. Demographic variables included age, gender, race, insurance status, and pre-transplant clinical condition were compared using t-tests and Chi-squared tests. Results: Patients undergoing transplants at new centers were significantly older than those at existing centers, both by mean age (55.5 ± 12.3 vs. 53.3 ± 12.8; p < 0.001) and proportion ≥ 65 years old (26.3% vs. 20.5%; p < 0.001). Cumulatively, there was a higher proportion of Black patients at new centers (28.6% vs. 23.6%; p < 0.001). Patients at new centers were less likely to have private insurance (39.7% vs. 47.6%; p < 0.001) and more likely to be hospitalized in the ICU at time of transplant (59.4% vs. 42.0%; p < 0.001). Other than race, these differences were present both at one year after new center initiation and cumulatively in the entire study time period. Conclusions: Patients undergoing heart transplant at new centers were found to be older, more likely to be Black, less likely to have private insurance, and more likely to be in the ICU at time of transplant compared to existing centers. These differences were present both in the first year after center initiation and cumulatively in the entire study time period, highlighting a persisting variation in population served by new centers. Transplant center initiation may expand access to cardiac transplant to patients who may otherwise have not been considered for this life saving therapy.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.