How does carbon pricing leverage emission reductions in the power sector? Evidence from China’s national carbon market

To examine the leverage effects of carbon pricing on power sector decarbonization and its underlying mechanisms, in this study, a dynamic emission abatement demand model is developed that incorporates lagged effects, innovatively integrated with convergent cross-mapping (CCM) causality analysis. Leveraging daily transaction data from China's national carbon market (January 2022-January 2024) and firm-level operational data from thermal power enterprises, we systematically unravel the nonlinear incentive mechanisms of carbon pricing. The key findings include the following. First, carbon prices exert significant amplification effects through cost transmission pathways, with an average short-term elasticity coefficient of 1.78 during trading phases, indicating that a 1% price increase drives a 1.78% marginal emission reduction. Second, CCM causality tests demonstrate that historical cumulative emissions exert threefold stronger causal influence (0.63) on market trading volumes compared to incremental emissions (0.21), validating the consensus-driven emission control under China's free quota allocation regime and the synergistic efficacy of cap-and-trade mechanisms. Third, while doubling discount factors and carbon asset conversion efficiency yields proportional growth in abatement demand (<100%), a 20% improvement in market liquidity amplifies demand by up to 100%, highlighting liquidity's critical role in enhancing price signalling efficacy during later trading stages. Our findings suggest that carbon markets can effectively incentivize power sector decarbonization, yet sustained impacts require market designs that balance liquidity optimization, risk mitigation, and dynamic quota allocation to deepen market maturity. This research contributes micro-level empirical evidence and methodological innovations for enhancing carbon pricing efficacy, offering actionable insights for policymakers to refine market mechanisms and accelerate low-carbon transitions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Carbon Balance and Management
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13021-025-00340-1
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Climate Change Policy and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.26

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How does carbon pricing leverage emission reductions in the power sector? Evidence from China’s national carbon market

Yazhi Song, Ke Peng, Yin Li
2 citations
Carbon Balance and Management
Climate Change Policy and Economics
6.26
article

How does carbon pricing leverage emission reductions in the power sector? Evidence from China’s national carbon market

Yazhi Song, Ke Peng, Yin Li
article en
2 citations

Abstract

To examine the leverage effects of carbon pricing on power sector decarbonization and its underlying mechanisms, in this study, a dynamic emission abatement demand model is developed that incorporates lagged effects, innovatively integrated with convergent cross-mapping (CCM) causality analysis. Leveraging daily transaction data from China's national carbon market (January 2022-January 2024) and firm-level operational data from thermal power enterprises, we systematically unravel the nonlinear incentive mechanisms of carbon pricing. The key findings include the following. First, carbon prices exert significant amplification effects through cost transmission pathways, with an average short-term elasticity coefficient of 1.78 during trading phases, indicating that a 1% price increase drives a 1.78% marginal emission reduction. Second, CCM causality tests demonstrate that historical cumulative emissions exert threefold stronger causal influence (0.63) on market trading volumes compared to incremental emissions (0.21), validating the consensus-driven emission control under China's free quota allocation regime and the synergistic efficacy of cap-and-trade mechanisms. Third, while doubling discount factors and carbon asset conversion efficiency yields proportional growth in abatement demand (<100%), a 20% improvement in market liquidity amplifies demand by up to 100%, highlighting liquidity's critical role in enhancing price signalling efficacy during later trading stages. Our findings suggest that carbon markets can effectively incentivize power sector decarbonization, yet sustained impacts require market designs that balance liquidity optimization, risk mitigation, and dynamic quota allocation to deepen market maturity. This research contributes micro-level empirical evidence and methodological innovations for enhancing carbon pricing efficacy, offering actionable insights for policymakers to refine market mechanisms and accelerate low-carbon transitions.

Carbon Balance and ManagementVol. 20(1)
Jiangsu Normal University (CN), China University of Mining and Technology (CN)
Government of Jiangsu Province, Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province, Jiangsu Provincial Department of Education, Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, National Social Science Fund of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Climate Change Policy and Economics
6.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.