Abstract 4369507: Large Language Models for Patient Education for Atrial Fibrillation

Background: Large language models (LLMs) are used by patients seeking information about atrial fibrillation. More than 1 billion monthly users use 4 common LLMs: ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude.ai, and Meta AI. It is not known, however, how LLM responses to atrial fibrillation inquiries differ by patient gender and ethnic group/race. Methods: The following query was posed to these 4 LLMs: “I am a 68-year-old [racial/ethnic group and gender] with atrial fibrillation. I had a heart attack 2 years ago with coronary artery stents. What can I expect from my cardiologist?” Three ethnic/racial groups (White, African American, and Latinx) and male/female gender were studied . Response analysis: Word Count, Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FK), and Cosine Similarity Score. ChatGPT4.5 was used to rate cultural sensitivity. Results: Average word counts: ChatGPT= 312.5, Gemini= 937.7, Claude.ai= 262.5, Meta AI=240 (mean 438.2±304.3). FK scores: ChatGPT=10.7, Gemini=13.3, Claude.ai=30.7, Meta AI=12.4 (mean 16.8±8.5). Meta AI generated the least culturally sensitive (CS) content across all demographic prompts. Word count analysis showed Meta AI and Claude.ai with the shortest responses, Gemini the longest. Cosine score ranged from 71.7%–78.2% (1.00 = perfect; mean 74.5±3.0). Readability analysis showed Claude.ai's responses had the lowest health literacy (beyond college), while ChatGPT’s were most accessible (10th-grade level). ChatGPT and Gemini mentioned CHA2DS2-VASc scores. All LLMs mentioned anticoagulation and antiarrhythmic medications. None mentioned catheter ablation. Of the 4 LLMs, Meta AI mentioned to the lowest extent systemic barriers/social determinants of health relevant to African American or Latinx patients. All except ChatGPT included cultural sensitivity and health issues for Black women. No LLMS included cultural issues for White women. Conclusion: The four LLMs are unique in their responses to queries about atrial fibrillation. As LLMs evolve it will be important to consider these variations to understand their strengths and limitations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4369507
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4369507: Large Language Models for Patient Education for Atrial Fibrillation

Margaret Wang, Paul J. Wang, Ngoc Bich Hoang, Eunah Chung et al.
Circulation
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Abstract 4369507: Large Language Models for Patient Education for Atrial Fibrillation

Margaret Wang, Paul J. Wang, Ngoc Bich Hoang, Eunah Chung, Gloria Wu, Owais Khan, N. Mendoza, Hrishi Paliath-Pathiyal, Riki Toram, Viki Toram, Ivan Chim
article en

Abstract

Background: Large language models (LLMs) are used by patients seeking information about atrial fibrillation. More than 1 billion monthly users use 4 common LLMs: ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude.ai, and Meta AI. It is not known, however, how LLM responses to atrial fibrillation inquiries differ by patient gender and ethnic group/race. Methods: The following query was posed to these 4 LLMs: “I am a 68-year-old [racial/ethnic group and gender] with atrial fibrillation. I had a heart attack 2 years ago with coronary artery stents. What can I expect from my cardiologist?” Three ethnic/racial groups (White, African American, and Latinx) and male/female gender were studied . Response analysis: Word Count, Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FK), and Cosine Similarity Score. ChatGPT4.5 was used to rate cultural sensitivity. Results: Average word counts: ChatGPT= 312.5, Gemini= 937.7, Claude.ai= 262.5, Meta AI=240 (mean 438.2±304.3). FK scores: ChatGPT=10.7, Gemini=13.3, Claude.ai=30.7, Meta AI=12.4 (mean 16.8±8.5). Meta AI generated the least culturally sensitive (CS) content across all demographic prompts. Word count analysis showed Meta AI and Claude.ai with the shortest responses, Gemini the longest. Cosine score ranged from 71.7%–78.2% (1.00 = perfect; mean 74.5±3.0). Readability analysis showed Claude.ai's responses had the lowest health literacy (beyond college), while ChatGPT’s were most accessible (10th-grade level). ChatGPT and Gemini mentioned CHA2DS2-VASc scores. All LLMs mentioned anticoagulation and antiarrhythmic medications. None mentioned catheter ablation. Of the 4 LLMs, Meta AI mentioned to the lowest extent systemic barriers/social determinants of health relevant to African American or Latinx patients. All except ChatGPT included cultural sensitivity and health issues for Black women. No LLMS included cultural issues for White women. Conclusion: The four LLMs are unique in their responses to queries about atrial fibrillation. As LLMs evolve it will be important to consider these variations to understand their strengths and limitations.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Boston University (US), Santa Clara University (US), Nova Southeastern University (US), Alabama College of Osteopathic Medicine (US), University of California San Diego (US), Universidad para la Cooperación Internacional (CR), San Francisco State University (US), University of California, Davis (US), Stanford University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.