Abstract 4360304: Leveraging the Role of Home Health Aides to Care for Adults with Heart Failure: Findings from a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Background: Home health aides (HHAs) frequently care for heart failure (HF) patients, but many lack training, confidence, and cannot reach their nurse supervisors when they need help. We examined the feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness of a novel education and communication-based intervention among HHAs in HF. Methods: In partnership with a large home care agency in NY, we conducted a pilot randomized control trial (RCT) with HHAs caring for a HF patient. HHAs were randomized to: a) HF training (control) or b) HF training plus mHealth app that allowed HHAs to text-message nurses in real-time (intervention) and followed for 90-days. Using the RE-AIM implemention framework, feasibility and acceptability were assessed with surveys and interviews. Effectiveness (primary) outcomes: HF knowledge (DHFK; 0-15) and HF Caregiver Self-Efficacy (SE; 0-100), secondary outcome: preventable 911 calls. Patient outcomes (exploratory): ED visits and hospitalization. Mixed effects models compared trajectory of outcomes between and within arms. Qualitative data were analyzed thematically. Results: Of 386 screened HHAs, 105 consented, and 102 completed baseline surveys (n=50 control; n=52 intervention), comprising the analytic sample. Mean age of 54 years (10.5 SD), 96% women, 62% Black. Baseline median DHFK score was 7.0 (IQR 5.0, 8.0) and SE score was 75.0 (62.5, 82). Overall, 80.4% completed HF training and 73% were retained at 90-days. At 90-days, DHFK and SE scores improved within both arms, but there was not a significant difference between arms. The proportion of HHAs with preventable 911 calls decreased in the intervention arm (0.51 vs. 0.34, p=0.06) and increased in the control arm (0.42 vs. 0.54, p=0.21); this difference was significant (p=0.04). Patients cared for by intervention HHAs were 56% less likely to have an ED visit vs. control (IRR 0.56 [0.25-1.28], p=0.17). Overall 65% of intervention HHAs texted their nurse; of these 42% texted regularly about clinical care. HHAs reported high levels of satisfaction, although some noted technology barriers. Conclusion: We recruited, retained, and engaged HHAs, a workforce that has rarely been the focus of HF interventions. Training improved HHAs HF knowledge and caregiving SE. The intervention reduced preventable 911 calls. Patients cared for by intervention HHAs had fewer ED visits. Findings can inform the design of a future large-scale trial, and how to better support and integrate HHAs providing care HF care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4360304
Primary Topic
Heart Failure Treatment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4360304: Leveraging the Role of Home Health Aides to Care for Adults with Heart Failure: Findings from a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Samprit Banerjee, Sasha Vergez, Monika M. Safford, Hannah W. Mitlak et al.
Circulation
Heart Failure Treatment and Management
article

Abstract 4360304: Leveraging the Role of Home Health Aides to Care for Adults with Heart Failure: Findings from a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Samprit Banerjee, Sasha Vergez, Monika M. Safford, Hannah W. Mitlak, Jonathan N. Tobin, Lisa M. Kern, Madeline R. Sterling, Cisco G. Espinosa, Nicola Dell, Margaret V. McDonald, Kiran Abraham-Aggarwal, joanna Ringel, Michelle Shum
article en

Abstract

Background: Home health aides (HHAs) frequently care for heart failure (HF) patients, but many lack training, confidence, and cannot reach their nurse supervisors when they need help. We examined the feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness of a novel education and communication-based intervention among HHAs in HF. Methods: In partnership with a large home care agency in NY, we conducted a pilot randomized control trial (RCT) with HHAs caring for a HF patient. HHAs were randomized to: a) HF training (control) or b) HF training plus mHealth app that allowed HHAs to text-message nurses in real-time (intervention) and followed for 90-days. Using the RE-AIM implemention framework, feasibility and acceptability were assessed with surveys and interviews. Effectiveness (primary) outcomes: HF knowledge (DHFK; 0-15) and HF Caregiver Self-Efficacy (SE; 0-100), secondary outcome: preventable 911 calls. Patient outcomes (exploratory): ED visits and hospitalization. Mixed effects models compared trajectory of outcomes between and within arms. Qualitative data were analyzed thematically. Results: Of 386 screened HHAs, 105 consented, and 102 completed baseline surveys (n=50 control; n=52 intervention), comprising the analytic sample. Mean age of 54 years (10.5 SD), 96% women, 62% Black. Baseline median DHFK score was 7.0 (IQR 5.0, 8.0) and SE score was 75.0 (62.5, 82). Overall, 80.4% completed HF training and 73% were retained at 90-days. At 90-days, DHFK and SE scores improved within both arms, but there was not a significant difference between arms. The proportion of HHAs with preventable 911 calls decreased in the intervention arm (0.51 vs. 0.34, p=0.06) and increased in the control arm (0.42 vs. 0.54, p=0.21); this difference was significant (p=0.04). Patients cared for by intervention HHAs were 56% less likely to have an ED visit vs. control (IRR 0.56 [0.25-1.28], p=0.17). Overall 65% of intervention HHAs texted their nurse; of these 42% texted regularly about clinical care. HHAs reported high levels of satisfaction, although some noted technology barriers. Conclusion: We recruited, retained, and engaged HHAs, a workforce that has rarely been the focus of HF interventions. Training improved HHAs HF knowledge and caregiving SE. The intervention reduced preventable 911 calls. Patients cared for by intervention HHAs had fewer ED visits. Findings can inform the design of a future large-scale trial, and how to better support and integrate HHAs providing care HF care.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Cornell University (US), Clinical Directors Network (US), TNS (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Heart Failure Treatment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.