Abstract 4357557: Renal Denervation versus Baroreflex Activation Therapy in Resistant Hypertension: Outcomes from a Real-World Registry

Background: Device-based therapies for hypertension, including renal denervation and baroreflex activation therapy, offer alternative strategies for blood-pressure control. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using TriNetX to compare adults (≥18 y) with resistant hypertension who underwent renal denervation (RDV) or baroreflex activation therapy (BAT) through October 2024, assessing efficacy and safety at 4, 8, 12, and 26 weeks post-procedure after propensity score matching. Results: After propensity-score matching (215 patients per arm), patients were followed for 4, 8, 12, and 26 weeks. At week 4, RDV achieved blood-pressure targets less often than BAT—RRs: 0.612 for SBP ≤ 130 mm Hg, 0.664 for DBP ≤ 80 mm Hg, 0.690 for SBP ≤ 130 or DBP ≤ 80, 0.674 for SBP ≤ 140, 0.772 for DBP ≤ 90, and 0.788 for SBP ≤ 140 or DBP ≤ 90 (all p < 0.005)—but had lower rates of AKI (0.420, p = 0.012), serious adverse events (SAEs) (0.289, p < 0.001), and hypotension (0.480, p < 0.001), with no differences in hospitalization, MACE, mortality, electrolyte disturbances, peripheral edema, headache, or dizziness. This trend persisted at week 8, with BP-target RR 0.615–0.775 (p ≤ 0.001) and continued reductions in AKI (0.323, p = 0.001), SAEs (0.342, p < 0.001), and hypotension (0.462, p < 0.001), while peri-procedural complications trended lower (0.571, p = 0.103) and other safety outcomes remained unchanged. At week 12, RDV again showed lower BP control (RR 0.636–0.805, p ≤ 0.002) with sustained reductions in AKI (0.278), hypotension (0.521), and SAEs (0.399) (all p < 0.001), and no change in hospitalization, MACE, mortality, biochemical abnormalities, peripheral edema, headache, or dizziness. By week 26, RDV continued to underperform in BP control—RR 0.69 for SBP ≤ 130 mm Hg, 0.66 for DBP ≤ 80 mm Hg, 0.73 for SBP ≤ 130 or DBP ≤ 80 mm Hg, 0.73 for SBP ≤ 140 mm Hg (all p < 0.001), and 0.83 for DBP ≤ 90 mm Hg or SBP ≤ 140/DBP ≤ 90 mm Hg (p = 0.005)—but maintained fewer SAEs (0.45, p < 0.001) and hyperkalemia (0.39, p = 0.005), with no differences in MACE, mortality, hospitalization, AKI, other electrolyte disturbances, or peripheral edema, headache, or dizziness. Conclusion: BAT achieved superior and sustained blood-pressure reductions relative to RDV, whereas RDV consistently conferred a more favorable safety profile, with significantly fewer AKI episodes, serious adverse events, and hypotension through 26 weeks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4357557
Primary Topic
Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4357557: Renal Denervation versus Baroreflex Activation Therapy in Resistant Hypertension: Outcomes from a Real-World Registry

Abubakar Nazir, Abdalhakim R. M. Shubietah, Muath Baniowda, Mohammad Alqadi et al.
Circulation
Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
article

Abstract 4357557: Renal Denervation versus Baroreflex Activation Therapy in Resistant Hypertension: Outcomes from a Real-World Registry

Abubakar Nazir, Abdalhakim R. M. Shubietah, Muath Baniowda, Mohammad Alqadi, Abdalrahman Assaassa, Qutaiba Qafisheh, Emmanuel Olumuyide, Ameer Awashra, Ahmed Emara, Mohamed S. Elgendy, Mohamed Saad Rakab, Hasan Munshi, Elsayed Balbaa, Osayd Tanbouz
article en

Abstract

Background: Device-based therapies for hypertension, including renal denervation and baroreflex activation therapy, offer alternative strategies for blood-pressure control. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using TriNetX to compare adults (≥18 y) with resistant hypertension who underwent renal denervation (RDV) or baroreflex activation therapy (BAT) through October 2024, assessing efficacy and safety at 4, 8, 12, and 26 weeks post-procedure after propensity score matching. Results: After propensity-score matching (215 patients per arm), patients were followed for 4, 8, 12, and 26 weeks. At week 4, RDV achieved blood-pressure targets less often than BAT—RRs: 0.612 for SBP ≤ 130 mm Hg, 0.664 for DBP ≤ 80 mm Hg, 0.690 for SBP ≤ 130 or DBP ≤ 80, 0.674 for SBP ≤ 140, 0.772 for DBP ≤ 90, and 0.788 for SBP ≤ 140 or DBP ≤ 90 (all p < 0.005)—but had lower rates of AKI (0.420, p = 0.012), serious adverse events (SAEs) (0.289, p < 0.001), and hypotension (0.480, p < 0.001), with no differences in hospitalization, MACE, mortality, electrolyte disturbances, peripheral edema, headache, or dizziness. This trend persisted at week 8, with BP-target RR 0.615–0.775 (p ≤ 0.001) and continued reductions in AKI (0.323, p = 0.001), SAEs (0.342, p < 0.001), and hypotension (0.462, p < 0.001), while peri-procedural complications trended lower (0.571, p = 0.103) and other safety outcomes remained unchanged. At week 12, RDV again showed lower BP control (RR 0.636–0.805, p ≤ 0.002) with sustained reductions in AKI (0.278), hypotension (0.521), and SAEs (0.399) (all p < 0.001), and no change in hospitalization, MACE, mortality, biochemical abnormalities, peripheral edema, headache, or dizziness. By week 26, RDV continued to underperform in BP control—RR 0.69 for SBP ≤ 130 mm Hg, 0.66 for DBP ≤ 80 mm Hg, 0.73 for SBP ≤ 130 or DBP ≤ 80 mm Hg, 0.73 for SBP ≤ 140 mm Hg (all p < 0.001), and 0.83 for DBP ≤ 90 mm Hg or SBP ≤ 140/DBP ≤ 90 mm Hg (p = 0.005)—but maintained fewer SAEs (0.45, p < 0.001) and hyperkalemia (0.39, p = 0.005), with no differences in MACE, mortality, hospitalization, AKI, other electrolyte disturbances, or peripheral edema, headache, or dizziness. Conclusion: BAT achieved superior and sustained blood-pressure reductions relative to RDV, whereas RDV consistently conferred a more favorable safety profile, with significantly fewer AKI episodes, serious adverse events, and hypotension through 26 weeks.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
King Edward Medical University (PK), Mansoura University (EG), An-Najah National University (PS), Al-Azhar University (EG), Tanta University (EG), Thomas Jefferson University Hospital (US), Advocate Illinois Masonic Medical Center (US), St. Joseph’s University Medical Center (US), University of Missouri–Kansas City (US), Alexandria University (EG), University of Toledo (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.