Abstract 4368203: A validated metabolite-based biomarker score for fruit and vegetable intake and associations with all-cause mortality and incident cardiometabolic diseases

Background: Epidemiological evidence underlying beneficial associations of fruit and vegetable intake with all-cause mortality and cardiovascular diseases largely relies on subjective dietary assessment. Research question: To identify a circulating biomarker score predictive of fruit and vegetable intake, perform validation in a feeding trial, and assess associations with all-cause mortality and incident cardiometabolic diseases. Methods and results: We included 3,979 EPIC-Norfolk participants, aged 40-79y, with plasma carotenoids and metabolites, measured by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography and ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry respectively, and 7-day diet diaries collected at baseline (1993-1998). Using elastic net regression with bootstrapping followed by ridge regression, we identified a metabolite score comprising 81 metabolites and 5 carotenoids, robustly correlated with self-reported fruit and vegetable intake ( r =0.51), explaining 44% of the variance, with discriminative ability across quintiles. We selected 17 metabolites with available chemical standards plus the 5 carotenoids, explaining 33% of the variance, for validation in a randomised controlled cross-over trial of 39 pre-hypertensive participants (NCT03410342). Participants consumed standardized diets low or high in fruit and vegetable types for two weeks, separated by a washout week. Mixed-effect regression analysis showed that the metabolite score significantly discriminated between low and high fruit and vegetable diets ( P <6x10 -5 ). Top 5 metabolites positively contributing to the metabolite score were erythritol, methyl glucopyranoside (alpha+beta), threonate, s-methylcysteine, and dopamine 3-O-sulfate. After a median follow-up ranging 16-20y and adjustment for confounders, each 1SD higher metabolite score was inversely associated with type 2 diabetes (HR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.69-0.93) and renal disease (HR: 0.85; 0.75-0.96), with borderline associations for all-cause mortality (HR: 0.95; 0.90-1.00), and cardiovascular diseases (HR: 0.94; 0.98-1.00. Associations of self-reported fruit and vegetable intake with outcomes were comparable to those using the metabolite score, with similar or wider 95% confidence intervals. Conclusion: These findings indicate the potential to use objective indicators of the physiological response to fruit and vegetable intake, and to elucidate mechanisms of association with disease.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4368203
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4368203: A validated metabolite-based biomarker score for fruit and vegetable intake and associations with all-cause mortality and incident cardiometabolic diseases

Albert Koulman, Linda M. Oude Griep, Nita G. Forouhi, Fumiaki Imamura et al.
Circulation
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
article

Abstract 4368203: A validated metabolite-based biomarker score for fruit and vegetable intake and associations with all-cause mortality and incident cardiometabolic diseases

Albert Koulman, Linda M. Oude Griep, Nita G. Forouhi, Fumiaki Imamura, Chunxiao Li, Nicholas J. Wareham
article en

Abstract

Background: Epidemiological evidence underlying beneficial associations of fruit and vegetable intake with all-cause mortality and cardiovascular diseases largely relies on subjective dietary assessment. Research question: To identify a circulating biomarker score predictive of fruit and vegetable intake, perform validation in a feeding trial, and assess associations with all-cause mortality and incident cardiometabolic diseases. Methods and results: We included 3,979 EPIC-Norfolk participants, aged 40-79y, with plasma carotenoids and metabolites, measured by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography and ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry respectively, and 7-day diet diaries collected at baseline (1993-1998). Using elastic net regression with bootstrapping followed by ridge regression, we identified a metabolite score comprising 81 metabolites and 5 carotenoids, robustly correlated with self-reported fruit and vegetable intake ( r =0.51), explaining 44% of the variance, with discriminative ability across quintiles. We selected 17 metabolites with available chemical standards plus the 5 carotenoids, explaining 33% of the variance, for validation in a randomised controlled cross-over trial of 39 pre-hypertensive participants (NCT03410342). Participants consumed standardized diets low or high in fruit and vegetable types for two weeks, separated by a washout week. Mixed-effect regression analysis showed that the metabolite score significantly discriminated between low and high fruit and vegetable diets ( P <6x10 -5 ). Top 5 metabolites positively contributing to the metabolite score were erythritol, methyl glucopyranoside (alpha+beta), threonate, s-methylcysteine, and dopamine 3-O-sulfate. After a median follow-up ranging 16-20y and adjustment for confounders, each 1SD higher metabolite score was inversely associated with type 2 diabetes (HR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.69-0.93) and renal disease (HR: 0.85; 0.75-0.96), with borderline associations for all-cause mortality (HR: 0.95; 0.90-1.00), and cardiovascular diseases (HR: 0.94; 0.98-1.00. Associations of self-reported fruit and vegetable intake with outcomes were comparable to those using the metabolite score, with similar or wider 95% confidence intervals. Conclusion: These findings indicate the potential to use objective indicators of the physiological response to fruit and vegetable intake, and to elucidate mechanisms of association with disease.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
University of Cambridge (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.