Abstract 4364716: Artificial Intelligence Analysis of Free-Text Discharge Summaries Facilitates Automated Risk Stratification for Cardiac Surgery Readmissions

Background: Cardiac surgery patients at high risk of readmission can be identified using risk calculators that rely on structured features requiring time-consuming manual chart review. We aimed to develop a cardiac surgery-specific artificial intelligence (AI) model to predict 30-day readmission using a large language model (LLM) to analyze electronic clinical notes. Secondary aims were to evaluate temporal trends in model performance, given changes in practice and the increasing use of short-stay units, and to correlate risk-predicted scores with readmission length of stay (LOS). Methods: We fine-tuned a general medical LLM developed at our institution using discharge summaries of 8,275 adult cardiac surgery patients (2014-2024). We implemented strict temporal validation by reserving post-June 2021 cases (n=3,031) as a pseudo-prospective test cohort. To evaluate temporal generalization, we assessed performance degradation over time (2022-2024) and investigated recalibration approaches. The model's potential as a general biomarker of post-cardiac surgery risk was evaluated by testing discrimination between observation stays (<48 hours) versus inpatient readmissions, and analyzing relationships between predicted risk scores and readmission LOS. Results: Our model achieved a temporal area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.71, with sensitivity 78.5% and specificity 50.1% (Figure 1). Performance showed temporal degradation (AUC 0.78 to 0.67) from 2022-2024, mitigated via recalibration. Risk scores predicted readmission LOS (p<0.001) and discriminated between observation and inpatient stays (AUC 0.69). We observed a bimodal risk distribution, suggesting distinct readmission risk phenotypes. Figure 2 shows that patients in the highest risk quintile experienced a mean LOS 1.9 times longer than the lowest quintile (7.1 vs. 3.7 days, p<0.001). Predicted risk scores increased annually, suggesting documentation drift may impact model performance (Figure 3). Conclusions: This study demonstrates that a cardiac-specific AI model, using analysis of unstructured clinical notes, predicted 30-day readmissions and captured key features of patient risk profiles without task-specific fine-tuning. Our analyses support the use of recalibration methods to mitigate data drift in a realistic deployment setting. By developing an LLM using postoperative cardiac surgery records, automated screening for high-risk readmissions becomes possible before discharge.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4364716
Primary Topic
Machine Learning in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4364716: Artificial Intelligence Analysis of Free-Text Discharge Summaries Facilitates Automated Risk Stratification for Cardiac Surgery Readmissions

Eugene A. Grossi, Daniel Alexander Alber, Eric K. Oermann, Katherine G. Phillips et al.
Circulation
Machine Learning in Healthcare
article

Abstract 4364716: Artificial Intelligence Analysis of Free-Text Discharge Summaries Facilitates Automated Risk Stratification for Cardiac Surgery Readmissions

Eugene A. Grossi, Daniel Alexander Alber, Eric K. Oermann, Katherine G. Phillips, Ralph S. Mosca
article en

Abstract

Background: Cardiac surgery patients at high risk of readmission can be identified using risk calculators that rely on structured features requiring time-consuming manual chart review. We aimed to develop a cardiac surgery-specific artificial intelligence (AI) model to predict 30-day readmission using a large language model (LLM) to analyze electronic clinical notes. Secondary aims were to evaluate temporal trends in model performance, given changes in practice and the increasing use of short-stay units, and to correlate risk-predicted scores with readmission length of stay (LOS). Methods: We fine-tuned a general medical LLM developed at our institution using discharge summaries of 8,275 adult cardiac surgery patients (2014-2024). We implemented strict temporal validation by reserving post-June 2021 cases (n=3,031) as a pseudo-prospective test cohort. To evaluate temporal generalization, we assessed performance degradation over time (2022-2024) and investigated recalibration approaches. The model's potential as a general biomarker of post-cardiac surgery risk was evaluated by testing discrimination between observation stays (<48 hours) versus inpatient readmissions, and analyzing relationships between predicted risk scores and readmission LOS. Results: Our model achieved a temporal area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.71, with sensitivity 78.5% and specificity 50.1% (Figure 1). Performance showed temporal degradation (AUC 0.78 to 0.67) from 2022-2024, mitigated via recalibration. Risk scores predicted readmission LOS (p<0.001) and discriminated between observation and inpatient stays (AUC 0.69). We observed a bimodal risk distribution, suggesting distinct readmission risk phenotypes. Figure 2 shows that patients in the highest risk quintile experienced a mean LOS 1.9 times longer than the lowest quintile (7.1 vs. 3.7 days, p<0.001). Predicted risk scores increased annually, suggesting documentation drift may impact model performance (Figure 3). Conclusions: This study demonstrates that a cardiac-specific AI model, using analysis of unstructured clinical notes, predicted 30-day readmissions and captured key features of patient risk profiles without task-specific fine-tuning. Our analyses support the use of recalibration methods to mitigate data drift in a realistic deployment setting. By developing an LLM using postoperative cardiac surgery records, automated screening for high-risk readmissions becomes possible before discharge.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
NYU Langone Health (US), New York University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Machine Learning in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.