Abstract 4359354: Impact of Mavacamten and Disopyramide on Left Ventricular Mechanical Dispersion and Ventricular Arrhythmia in Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopath

Background: Obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (oHCM) is characterized by left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy and outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction, increasing the risk of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias (ltVA), including sustained ventricular tachycardia and sudden cardiac arrest. While both mavacamten and disopyramide reduce LVOT gradients, their impact on LV remodeling and arrhythmic risk remains unclear. Research question/hypothesis: Do mavacamten and disopyramide, two agents with negative inotropic effects, differ in their electromechanical impact in patients with oHCM? We hypothesized that mavacamten would reduce LVMD, improve myocardial work indices, and lower the incidence of ltVA compared to disopyramide, and that lower LVMD would be associated with reduced ltVA events. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 120 oHCM patients treated with mavacamten (n=47) or disopyramide (n=73). LV remodeling was assessed using echocardiographic speckle-tracking before and after treatment (median 12 months (range: 6-24)). Patients were followed for 2 years for ltVA events (Holter, loop recorder, or ICD interrogations). Age and sex matching (1:1) resulted in 40 mavacamten and 40 disopyramide patients. Results: Mavacamten significantly reduced LVMD (p=0.013), global wasted work (GWW) (p=0.006), and improved global work efficiency (p=0.038), while disopyramide had no significant effect on these indices (Table 1, Figure 1). In the matched cohort, over a median follow-up of 19 months, 11 ltVA events (10 ventricular tachycardia, 1 sudden cardiac arrest) occurred in the disopyramide group versus 1 ventricular tachycardia in the mavacamten group (p=0.002). Post-treatment LVMD >72 ms was linked to higher ltVA rates (p<0.001), and mavacamten was associated with LVMD independently of age, myocardial work indices, and high-risk sudden cardiac arrest profile (Table 2). LVMD ≤72 ms (p=0.011) was associated with lower ltVA risk (Figure 2). Conclusion: Mavacamten improved LV remodeling by reducing LVMD and GWW, and was associated with fewer ltVA events in contrast to disopyramide.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4359354
Primary Topic
Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4359354: Impact of Mavacamten and Disopyramide on Left Ventricular Mechanical Dispersion and Ventricular Arrhythmia in Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopath

Benay Özbay, William E. Katz, Leyla Elif Sade, Genise Renee Green et al.
Circulation
Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies
article

Abstract 4359354: Impact of Mavacamten and Disopyramide on Left Ventricular Mechanical Dispersion and Ventricular Arrhythmia in Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopath

Benay Özbay, William E. Katz, Leyla Elif Sade, Genise Renee Green, Matthew S. Suffoletto, Nathan Anthony Mark Estes, Timothy Wong, Elizabeth Luttner
article en

Abstract

Background: Obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (oHCM) is characterized by left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy and outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction, increasing the risk of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias (ltVA), including sustained ventricular tachycardia and sudden cardiac arrest. While both mavacamten and disopyramide reduce LVOT gradients, their impact on LV remodeling and arrhythmic risk remains unclear. Research question/hypothesis: Do mavacamten and disopyramide, two agents with negative inotropic effects, differ in their electromechanical impact in patients with oHCM? We hypothesized that mavacamten would reduce LVMD, improve myocardial work indices, and lower the incidence of ltVA compared to disopyramide, and that lower LVMD would be associated with reduced ltVA events. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 120 oHCM patients treated with mavacamten (n=47) or disopyramide (n=73). LV remodeling was assessed using echocardiographic speckle-tracking before and after treatment (median 12 months (range: 6-24)). Patients were followed for 2 years for ltVA events (Holter, loop recorder, or ICD interrogations). Age and sex matching (1:1) resulted in 40 mavacamten and 40 disopyramide patients. Results: Mavacamten significantly reduced LVMD (p=0.013), global wasted work (GWW) (p=0.006), and improved global work efficiency (p=0.038), while disopyramide had no significant effect on these indices (Table 1, Figure 1). In the matched cohort, over a median follow-up of 19 months, 11 ltVA events (10 ventricular tachycardia, 1 sudden cardiac arrest) occurred in the disopyramide group versus 1 ventricular tachycardia in the mavacamten group (p=0.002). Post-treatment LVMD >72 ms was linked to higher ltVA rates (p<0.001), and mavacamten was associated with LVMD independently of age, myocardial work indices, and high-risk sudden cardiac arrest profile (Table 2). LVMD ≤72 ms (p=0.011) was associated with lower ltVA risk (Figure 2). Conclusion: Mavacamten improved LV remodeling by reducing LVMD and GWW, and was associated with fewer ltVA events in contrast to disopyramide.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
University of Pittsburgh (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.