Abstract 4349153: Genicular Artery Embolization for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review of Sham-Controlled Randomized Trials

Background: Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is associated with significant chronic pain and functional impairment. Genicular artery embolization (GAE), a minimally invasive procedure, targets abnormal synovial neovascularization linked to pain and inflammation in KOA. This systematic review evaluates the efficacy and safety of GAE versus sham procedures in adults with symptomatic KOA. Methods: A systematic literature search (PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science) up to March 2025 identified sham-controlled randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing GAE in symptomatic KOA. Data extracted included study design, patient demographics, interventions, pain outcomes (KOOS, VAS), functional outcomes (WOMAC, KOOS subscales), and adverse events. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool. Results: Three RCTs (total n=138) were included. One trial (Bagla et al.) showed significant short-term pain relief at 1-month post-GAE (VAS: −50.8 vs −0.5, p<0.01), though the clinical meaningfulness of this statistically significant improvement remains uncertain. Other studies (Van Zadelhoff et al., Landers et al.) demonstrated modest pain improvements (KOOS) at 4 and 12 months without statistical significance. Functional outcomes varied: WOMAC scores significantly improved post-GAE in one trial, while another reported significant improvements in quality of life only with complete embolization. Notably, the included trials employed different embolization agents, introducing heterogeneity that may limit the generalizability of these findings. No serious adverse events were reported; minor adverse events, primarily catheter-site bruising, occurred infrequently and resolved spontaneously. Conclusions: GAE appears safe and may offer short-term symptomatic pain relief for select KOA patients. However, inconsistent findings, small sample sizes, methodological heterogeneity, and short follow-ups limit conclusive efficacy assessments. Larger, standardized RCTs with extended follow-up are essential to better define GAE's clinical role in managing knee osteoarthritis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4349153
Primary Topic
Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4349153: Genicular Artery Embolization for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review of Sham-Controlled Randomized Trials

Yazan Hamdan, Ayesha Younas, Waseem Shehadeh, Mohammad Bdair et al.
Circulation
Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
article

Abstract 4349153: Genicular Artery Embolization for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review of Sham-Controlled Randomized Trials

Yazan Hamdan, Ayesha Younas, Waseem Shehadeh, Mohammad Bdair, A. Zahra, Fathi Milhem, Mohamed S. Elgendy, Muhammad Takhman, Orabi Hajjeh, Sakeena Saife, Sarah Saife, Omar Abu-Khazneh, Qutayba Z. Ayaseh
article en

Abstract

Background: Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is associated with significant chronic pain and functional impairment. Genicular artery embolization (GAE), a minimally invasive procedure, targets abnormal synovial neovascularization linked to pain and inflammation in KOA. This systematic review evaluates the efficacy and safety of GAE versus sham procedures in adults with symptomatic KOA. Methods: A systematic literature search (PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science) up to March 2025 identified sham-controlled randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing GAE in symptomatic KOA. Data extracted included study design, patient demographics, interventions, pain outcomes (KOOS, VAS), functional outcomes (WOMAC, KOOS subscales), and adverse events. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool. Results: Three RCTs (total n=138) were included. One trial (Bagla et al.) showed significant short-term pain relief at 1-month post-GAE (VAS: −50.8 vs −0.5, p<0.01), though the clinical meaningfulness of this statistically significant improvement remains uncertain. Other studies (Van Zadelhoff et al., Landers et al.) demonstrated modest pain improvements (KOOS) at 4 and 12 months without statistical significance. Functional outcomes varied: WOMAC scores significantly improved post-GAE in one trial, while another reported significant improvements in quality of life only with complete embolization. Notably, the included trials employed different embolization agents, introducing heterogeneity that may limit the generalizability of these findings. No serious adverse events were reported; minor adverse events, primarily catheter-site bruising, occurred infrequently and resolved spontaneously. Conclusions: GAE appears safe and may offer short-term symptomatic pain relief for select KOA patients. However, inconsistent findings, small sample sizes, methodological heterogeneity, and short follow-ups limit conclusive efficacy assessments. Larger, standardized RCTs with extended follow-up are essential to better define GAE's clinical role in managing knee osteoarthritis.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
An-Najah National University (PS), Allama Iqbal Medical College (PK), Tanta University (EG), Hurley Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.