Abstract 4368298: AI-Enhanced Automated Vascular Risk Assessment Using Multi-Territory Non-Coronary Imaging: A Systematic Review

Introduction: Standard cardiovascular testing relies primarily on medical history and coronary imaging, which may fail to detect the full extent of systemic vascular disease. Using AI in non-coronary vascular blood vessel areas, such as the carotid, aortic, and peripheral systems, may offer a thorough investigation and provide a better understanding of one's risk. Currently, manual assessments require a significant amount of time, and the varying interpretations of different experts often influence their accuracy. Hypothesis: Applying AI to the automated analysis of imaging for vascular diseases across multiple territories yields more accurate predictions of major adverse cardiovascular events than traditional risk scores and image analysis from a single area. Methods: Using PRISMA standards, we searched a range of databases (from 2018 to 2024) for studies focused on AI algorithms in non-coronary vascular imaging. Two researchers evaluated the studies and pulled out the information on predicting cardiovascular death, heart attack and stroke. Secondary outcomes included measuring the frequency with which each test produces the same result, assessing the time required for processing, and evaluating how well they correlate with established vascular biomarkers. A review of study quality was conducted using the QUADAS-2 and NOS. Results: All 23 selected studies (n = 28,894) found that AI-enhanced analysis of vascular parameters consistently predicted risk more accurately than traditional risk scales. Measurements of carotid thickness and stiffness of the aorta and arteries of the legs were highly reproducible and required much less analysis time using automation. Authors across various studies found that models using data from multiple areas performed better than models trained solely on one area. Conclusion: This analysis demonstrates that AI features in the automated analysis of imaging from multiple locations outside the heart enhance both the accuracy and efficiency of cardiovascular risk estimation. It enables thorough surveying of the vascular system for precision cardiology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4368298
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4368298: AI-Enhanced Automated Vascular Risk Assessment Using Multi-Territory Non-Coronary Imaging: A Systematic Review

Inshal Jawed, Favour C Mekowulu, Abu Huraira Bin Gulzar, Shagufta Jabeen et al.
Circulation
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
article

Abstract 4368298: AI-Enhanced Automated Vascular Risk Assessment Using Multi-Territory Non-Coronary Imaging: A Systematic Review

Inshal Jawed, Favour C Mekowulu, Abu Huraira Bin Gulzar, Shagufta Jabeen, Syed Ali Farhan Abbas Rizvi, Mohammad Omer Alam, Aizaz Anwar Khalid, Maqbool Qadir, Hersh Tilokani
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Standard cardiovascular testing relies primarily on medical history and coronary imaging, which may fail to detect the full extent of systemic vascular disease. Using AI in non-coronary vascular blood vessel areas, such as the carotid, aortic, and peripheral systems, may offer a thorough investigation and provide a better understanding of one's risk. Currently, manual assessments require a significant amount of time, and the varying interpretations of different experts often influence their accuracy. Hypothesis: Applying AI to the automated analysis of imaging for vascular diseases across multiple territories yields more accurate predictions of major adverse cardiovascular events than traditional risk scores and image analysis from a single area. Methods: Using PRISMA standards, we searched a range of databases (from 2018 to 2024) for studies focused on AI algorithms in non-coronary vascular imaging. Two researchers evaluated the studies and pulled out the information on predicting cardiovascular death, heart attack and stroke. Secondary outcomes included measuring the frequency with which each test produces the same result, assessing the time required for processing, and evaluating how well they correlate with established vascular biomarkers. A review of study quality was conducted using the QUADAS-2 and NOS. Results: All 23 selected studies (n = 28,894) found that AI-enhanced analysis of vascular parameters consistently predicted risk more accurately than traditional risk scales. Measurements of carotid thickness and stiffness of the aorta and arteries of the legs were highly reproducible and required much less analysis time using automation. Authors across various studies found that models using data from multiple areas performed better than models trained solely on one area. Conclusion: This analysis demonstrates that AI features in the automated analysis of imaging from multiple locations outside the heart enhance both the accuracy and efficiency of cardiovascular risk estimation. It enables thorough surveying of the vascular system for precision cardiology.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Services Institute of Medical Sciences (PK), Karachi Medical and Dental College (PK), Khyber Medical College (PK), UCLA Health (US), Jinnah Sindh Medical University (PK), Dow University of Health Sciences (PK), University of Swabi (PK), Reha Rheinfelden (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.