Abstract 4359392: Additive Value of Lipoprotein(a), Remnant Cholesterol, and Inflammation for Risk Stratification of Myocardial Infarction: Evidence from the UK Biobank

Background: Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], remnant cholesterol (RC), and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), a marker of systemic inflammation, are emerging non-traditional biomarkers for cardiovascular (CV) risk stratification and treatment guidance. Each of these biomarkers may reflect a distinct but complementary pathway contributing to atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease (CVD). Therefore, an approach that combines all three may improve the predictive power for CV risk assessment. Research Question: To what extent does a multi-marker approach combining Lp(a), RC, and hsCRP improve prediction of first myocardial (MI) compared to the use of each biomarker individually? Methods: We analyzed data from 306,183 participants in the UK Biobank who were free of CVD at baseline and had available measurements for Lp(a), RC, and hsCRP. RC was calculated as total cholesterol minus LDL-C and HDL-C. We examined the cumulative effect of biomarker burden, defined as the number of biomarkers in the highest quintile (0 to 3). We also used Cox proportional hazards models to assess hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for MI risk across biomarker quintiles, adjusted for conventional CV risk factors and the other two biomarkers. Results: The mean baseline age was 56.4 years; 54.7% were women. Over a 15-year median follow-up, 10,824 MI events occurred (3.5%). There was a graded increase in MI incidence with a rising number of biomarkers in the top quintile (Figure). Adjusted HRs for MI comparing the top versus bottom quintiles were 1.09 (95% CI: 1.08–1.11) for Lp(a), 1.14 (1.13–1.16) for RC, and 1.08 (1.06–1.10) for hsCRP. Relative to individuals with no biomarkers in the top quintile, HRs for MI among those with one, two, or all three biomarkers in the top quintile were 1.45 (1.39–1.51), 2.14 (2.02–2.26), and 2.83 (2.48–3.24), respectively (Table).: Conclusions: Among adults in the UK Biobank without baseline CVD, a multi-marker approach incorporating lipoprotein(a), remnant cholesterol, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein was associated with a stepwise increase in first myocardial infarction risk corresponding to greater biomarker burden. These findings support the potential value of integrative risk stratification approaches in primary prevention. Further research is warranted to determine whether this multi-marker strategy can inform treatment decisions or improve outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4359392
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4359392: Additive Value of Lipoprotein(a), Remnant Cholesterol, and Inflammation for Risk Stratification of Myocardial Infarction: Evidence from the UK Biobank

Jeffrey S. Kingsley, Rishi Rikhi, Michael D. Shapiro, Richard Kazibwe et al.
Circulation
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
article

Abstract 4359392: Additive Value of Lipoprotein(a), Remnant Cholesterol, and Inflammation for Risk Stratification of Myocardial Infarction: Evidence from the UK Biobank

Jeffrey S. Kingsley, Rishi Rikhi, Michael D. Shapiro, Richard Kazibwe, Christopher L. Schaich, Saeid Mirzai, Parag Anilkumar Chevli, Juliana H. Namutebi
article en

Abstract

Background: Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], remnant cholesterol (RC), and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), a marker of systemic inflammation, are emerging non-traditional biomarkers for cardiovascular (CV) risk stratification and treatment guidance. Each of these biomarkers may reflect a distinct but complementary pathway contributing to atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease (CVD). Therefore, an approach that combines all three may improve the predictive power for CV risk assessment. Research Question: To what extent does a multi-marker approach combining Lp(a), RC, and hsCRP improve prediction of first myocardial (MI) compared to the use of each biomarker individually? Methods: We analyzed data from 306,183 participants in the UK Biobank who were free of CVD at baseline and had available measurements for Lp(a), RC, and hsCRP. RC was calculated as total cholesterol minus LDL-C and HDL-C. We examined the cumulative effect of biomarker burden, defined as the number of biomarkers in the highest quintile (0 to 3). We also used Cox proportional hazards models to assess hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for MI risk across biomarker quintiles, adjusted for conventional CV risk factors and the other two biomarkers. Results: The mean baseline age was 56.4 years; 54.7% were women. Over a 15-year median follow-up, 10,824 MI events occurred (3.5%). There was a graded increase in MI incidence with a rising number of biomarkers in the top quintile (Figure). Adjusted HRs for MI comparing the top versus bottom quintiles were 1.09 (95% CI: 1.08–1.11) for Lp(a), 1.14 (1.13–1.16) for RC, and 1.08 (1.06–1.10) for hsCRP. Relative to individuals with no biomarkers in the top quintile, HRs for MI among those with one, two, or all three biomarkers in the top quintile were 1.45 (1.39–1.51), 2.14 (2.02–2.26), and 2.83 (2.48–3.24), respectively (Table).: Conclusions: Among adults in the UK Biobank without baseline CVD, a multi-marker approach incorporating lipoprotein(a), remnant cholesterol, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein was associated with a stepwise increase in first myocardial infarction risk corresponding to greater biomarker burden. These findings support the potential value of integrative risk stratification approaches in primary prevention. Further research is warranted to determine whether this multi-marker strategy can inform treatment decisions or improve outcomes.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Wake Forest University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.