Abstract 4361616: Deglycosylation Enhances Performance of Soluble Urokinase Plasminogen Activator Receptor (suPAR) Levels for Acute Decompensated Heart Failure Diagnosis

Introduction: Soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) is an inflammatory biomarker associated with incident acute heart failure. However, its diagnostic utility may be limited by N-linked glycosylation, which can hinder antibody recognition in ELISA. We investigated whether enzymatic removal of glycosylation improves suPAR’s diagnostic performance for acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF). Methods: Plasma samples from patients presenting to the emergency department with undifferentiated acute breathlessness (n = 103) were treated with deglycosylation enzyme (PNGase F) to remove suPAR N-linked glycosylation. suPAR concentrations were measured using the CE-marked suPARnostic ELISA (Virogates). The percentage change in paired enzyme-treated and non-treated suPAR concentrations was assessed using the Mann-Whitney U test. Diagnostic performance of non-treated vs deglycosylated suPAR was evaluated by Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC)-AUC analysis (SPSS) and compared to NT-proBNP (Roche Cobas). Results: Of the 103 patients, 53 (51.4%) were diagnosed with ADHF and 50 (48.5%) with non-HF causes (pneumonia, COPD). Non-treated suPAR concentrations were higher in ADHF (4.5 ng/mL, IQR: 3.4-5.8) compared to non-HF breathless patients (3.2 ng/mL, IQR: 2.3-3.9) (p<0.001). Enzymatic treatment increased suPAR concentrations in all patients, but the increment was significantly greater in ADHF (median increase 39%, IQR 34-44) compared to non-HF (median increase 24%, IQR: 13-35) (p=0.002). ROC-AUC analyses revealed that deglycosylated suPAR (AUC = 0.850, 95% CI 0.752-0.947) was better at discriminating ADHF compared to non-treated suPAR (AUC = 0.765, 95% CI 0.649-0.882), and performance was comparable to that of NT-proBNP (AUC = 0.890, 95% CI 0.799-0.982) (p = 0.21). Conclusion: Glycosylation masks diagnostically relevant suPAR epitopes in the current ELISA, impairing its discriminative performance for ADHF. Further evaluation is needed to establish diagnostic value of deglycosylated suPAR levels in complementary with current cardiac markers.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4361616
Primary Topic
Protease and Inhibitor Mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4361616: Deglycosylation Enhances Performance of Soluble Urokinase Plasminogen Activator Receptor (suPAR) Levels for Acute Decompensated Heart Failure Diagnosis

Richard W. Troughton, Jaya Montecillo
Circulation
Protease and Inhibitor Mechanisms
article

Abstract 4361616: Deglycosylation Enhances Performance of Soluble Urokinase Plasminogen Activator Receptor (suPAR) Levels for Acute Decompensated Heart Failure Diagnosis

Richard W. Troughton, Jaya Montecillo
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) is an inflammatory biomarker associated with incident acute heart failure. However, its diagnostic utility may be limited by N-linked glycosylation, which can hinder antibody recognition in ELISA. We investigated whether enzymatic removal of glycosylation improves suPAR’s diagnostic performance for acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF). Methods: Plasma samples from patients presenting to the emergency department with undifferentiated acute breathlessness (n = 103) were treated with deglycosylation enzyme (PNGase F) to remove suPAR N-linked glycosylation. suPAR concentrations were measured using the CE-marked suPARnostic ELISA (Virogates). The percentage change in paired enzyme-treated and non-treated suPAR concentrations was assessed using the Mann-Whitney U test. Diagnostic performance of non-treated vs deglycosylated suPAR was evaluated by Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC)-AUC analysis (SPSS) and compared to NT-proBNP (Roche Cobas). Results: Of the 103 patients, 53 (51.4%) were diagnosed with ADHF and 50 (48.5%) with non-HF causes (pneumonia, COPD). Non-treated suPAR concentrations were higher in ADHF (4.5 ng/mL, IQR: 3.4-5.8) compared to non-HF breathless patients (3.2 ng/mL, IQR: 2.3-3.9) (p<0.001). Enzymatic treatment increased suPAR concentrations in all patients, but the increment was significantly greater in ADHF (median increase 39%, IQR 34-44) compared to non-HF (median increase 24%, IQR: 13-35) (p=0.002). ROC-AUC analyses revealed that deglycosylated suPAR (AUC = 0.850, 95% CI 0.752-0.947) was better at discriminating ADHF compared to non-treated suPAR (AUC = 0.765, 95% CI 0.649-0.882), and performance was comparable to that of NT-proBNP (AUC = 0.890, 95% CI 0.799-0.982) (p = 0.21). Conclusion: Glycosylation masks diagnostically relevant suPAR epitopes in the current ELISA, impairing its discriminative performance for ADHF. Further evaluation is needed to establish diagnostic value of deglycosylated suPAR levels in complementary with current cardiac markers.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Protease and Inhibitor Mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.