Abstract 4339719: Impact of Tricuspid Regurgitation Severity on Clinical Outcomes Following Mitral Valve Interventions: A Meta-Analysis

Bachground: Functional tricuspid regurgitation (TR) frequently develops secondary to mitral valve disease, but its impact on clinical outcomes after mitral valve interventions are not properly understood. The best management strategy for moderate to severe tricuspid regurgitation after mitral valve intervention still continues to be debated Hypothesis: We hypothesized that moderate to severe TR at baseline is associated with more mortality and adverse cardiovascular events following mitral valve intervention, regardless of intervention type, compared with none/mild TR Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Google scholar for studies examining baseline TR severity impact on clinical outcomes, following Mitral valve interventions. Patients are stratified by baseline TR severity into Non-severe group(none/mild TR) and Severe group(moderate/severe TR). Inverse-variance weighting method was used and risk ratio’s along with their 95%CI was calculated by using Random effects model. All the analysis was done in R software version 4.5.0 Results: We included 3 studies with 5907 patients, who were divided into Non-severe and severe groups based on their baseline TR severity. Non-severe group demonstrated significantly less All cause mortality compared to severe group (RR= 0.29; 95%CI: 0.19, 0.45; p<0.0001). in-hospital stroke was significantly less in Non-severe group (RR= 0.44; 95%CI: 0.24, 0.80; p=0.0071) and risk of new onset in-hospital Atrial fibrillation was also significantly less in Non-severe group (RR= 0.79; 95%CI: 0.67, 0.93; p=0.004). Heterogeneity was negligible, indicating that outcomes were consistent across these studies. Conclusion: Moderate to severe TR independently showed increased risk of mortality and in-hospital risk of new onset Atrial fibrillations and stroke compared to none/mild TR in patients who underwent mitral valve interventions. These findings suggest that early identification and management of TR during mitral valve procedures are important and therefore TR severity should be a key consideration for procedural planning during mitral valve interventions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4339719
Primary Topic
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4339719: Impact of Tricuspid Regurgitation Severity on Clinical Outcomes Following Mitral Valve Interventions: A Meta-Analysis

Raam Mannam, Nirmit Patel, Nithin Kumar Konanur Srinivasa, Ravi Medarametla et al.
Circulation
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
article

Abstract 4339719: Impact of Tricuspid Regurgitation Severity on Clinical Outcomes Following Mitral Valve Interventions: A Meta-Analysis

Raam Mannam, Nirmit Patel, Nithin Kumar Konanur Srinivasa, Ravi Medarametla, Atul Prakash
article en

Abstract

Bachground: Functional tricuspid regurgitation (TR) frequently develops secondary to mitral valve disease, but its impact on clinical outcomes after mitral valve interventions are not properly understood. The best management strategy for moderate to severe tricuspid regurgitation after mitral valve intervention still continues to be debated Hypothesis: We hypothesized that moderate to severe TR at baseline is associated with more mortality and adverse cardiovascular events following mitral valve intervention, regardless of intervention type, compared with none/mild TR Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Google scholar for studies examining baseline TR severity impact on clinical outcomes, following Mitral valve interventions. Patients are stratified by baseline TR severity into Non-severe group(none/mild TR) and Severe group(moderate/severe TR). Inverse-variance weighting method was used and risk ratio’s along with their 95%CI was calculated by using Random effects model. All the analysis was done in R software version 4.5.0 Results: We included 3 studies with 5907 patients, who were divided into Non-severe and severe groups based on their baseline TR severity. Non-severe group demonstrated significantly less All cause mortality compared to severe group (RR= 0.29; 95%CI: 0.19, 0.45; p<0.0001). in-hospital stroke was significantly less in Non-severe group (RR= 0.44; 95%CI: 0.24, 0.80; p=0.0071) and risk of new onset in-hospital Atrial fibrillation was also significantly less in Non-severe group (RR= 0.79; 95%CI: 0.67, 0.93; p=0.004). Heterogeneity was negligible, indicating that outcomes were consistent across these studies. Conclusion: Moderate to severe TR independently showed increased risk of mortality and in-hospital risk of new onset Atrial fibrillations and stroke compared to none/mild TR in patients who underwent mitral valve interventions. These findings suggest that early identification and management of TR during mitral valve procedures are important and therefore TR severity should be a key consideration for procedural planning during mitral valve interventions.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Mamata Medical College (IN), St. Mary's Hospital (US), St. Mary's Medical Center (US), Thomas Cole Historic House (US), Reckitt Benckiser (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.