Abstract 4363437: Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Refractory Ventricular Tachycardia in Patients with Left Ventricular Assist Devices

Background: Patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) may develop ventricular tachycardia (VT) refractory to conventional antiarrhythmic strategies. Catheter ablation is associated with increased procedural risks in this population and may be less effective, especially when critical substrate is epicardial or near the LVAD cannula. Cardiac stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has emerged as a promising therapy for patients with VT refractory to antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) and catheter ablation. However, clinical data on SBRT in patients with LVADs remain limited. Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of cardiac SBRT in managing refractory VT in patients with durable LVAD support. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of all patients with existing LVADs who underwent SBRT (25 Gy) for drug- and ablation-refractory VT at our institution. All patients had previously failed conventional therapies. Clinical outcomes, including VT recurrence, implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapies, ventricular function, complications, and survival, were assessed over a follow-up period ranging from 3 to 28 months. Results: Four patients met inclusion criteria (see Table). Three experienced VT recurrence: one within the first month and two within two months post-SBRT. One of these recurrences resulted in an ICD shock. One patient has remained arrhythmia-free for 14 months post-treatment. Importantly, no patients experienced LVAD-related complications attributable to SBRT. Post-treatment echocardiographic assessment revealed no significant changes in left or right ventricular function. Three patients died during follow-up at 3, 17, and 22 months. Only one death was directly attributed to refractory VT; the remaining two were due to hypoxic respiratory failure and septic shock. Conclusion: In this small series, cardiac SBRT appeared safe and potentially beneficial for patients with LVADs and refractory VT. Although most patients experienced recurrent VT, SBRT may delay recurrence in selected high-risk individuals. One patient achieved sustained arrhythmia suppression. These findings support further investigation of SBRT as a non-invasive adjunctive therapy in this challenging population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4363437
Primary Topic
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4363437: Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Refractory Ventricular Tachycardia in Patients with Left Ventricular Assist Devices

Mohamad Raad, David S. Frankel, Jian Liang Tan, Tanzim Bhuiya et al.
Circulation
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
article

Abstract 4363437: Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Refractory Ventricular Tachycardia in Patients with Left Ventricular Assist Devices

Mohamad Raad, David S. Frankel, Jian Liang Tan, Tanzim Bhuiya, Jeffrey Arkles, Francis E. Marchlinski, M. Litt, Monica Chelius, Stephen Keane, Keith A. Cengel, Cory M. Tschabrunn, Timothy M. Markman
article en

Abstract

Background: Patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) may develop ventricular tachycardia (VT) refractory to conventional antiarrhythmic strategies. Catheter ablation is associated with increased procedural risks in this population and may be less effective, especially when critical substrate is epicardial or near the LVAD cannula. Cardiac stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has emerged as a promising therapy for patients with VT refractory to antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) and catheter ablation. However, clinical data on SBRT in patients with LVADs remain limited. Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of cardiac SBRT in managing refractory VT in patients with durable LVAD support. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of all patients with existing LVADs who underwent SBRT (25 Gy) for drug- and ablation-refractory VT at our institution. All patients had previously failed conventional therapies. Clinical outcomes, including VT recurrence, implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapies, ventricular function, complications, and survival, were assessed over a follow-up period ranging from 3 to 28 months. Results: Four patients met inclusion criteria (see Table). Three experienced VT recurrence: one within the first month and two within two months post-SBRT. One of these recurrences resulted in an ICD shock. One patient has remained arrhythmia-free for 14 months post-treatment. Importantly, no patients experienced LVAD-related complications attributable to SBRT. Post-treatment echocardiographic assessment revealed no significant changes in left or right ventricular function. Three patients died during follow-up at 3, 17, and 22 months. Only one death was directly attributed to refractory VT; the remaining two were due to hypoxic respiratory failure and septic shock. Conclusion: In this small series, cardiac SBRT appeared safe and potentially beneficial for patients with LVADs and refractory VT. Although most patients experienced recurrent VT, SBRT may delay recurrence in selected high-risk individuals. One patient achieved sustained arrhythmia suppression. These findings support further investigation of SBRT as a non-invasive adjunctive therapy in this challenging population.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Penn Center for AIDS Research (US), University of Pennsylvania (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.