Abstract 4364754: Prevalence of Non-Coronary Incidental Findings Identified on CT Coronary Artery Calcium Scans Performed on Patients Enrolled in the CorCal Study. Do we need to keep track of them?

Background: Coronary Artery Calcium CT scans provide a coronary artery calcium score that may be very useful in ascertaining a patient’s future cardiovascular risk. However, besides the coronary artery calcium score itself, the CT scan may also identify many potentially significant non-coronary cardiac and other organ-related “incidental” findings. Whether potentially clinically substantial incidental findings can be determined frequently enough to justify the extra work required to perform a non-coronary review of every coronary artery CT scan is not known. Methods: The CorCal study randomized asymptomatic, otherwise healthy patients to receive ASCVD risk stratification using either the results of the Pooled Cohort Equation or a CT coronary calcium scan. By protocol, in addition to calculating a coronary artery calcium score, the interpreting radiologists carefully evaluated and reported all identified potentially significant non-coronary incidental findings. The prevalence of these findings, as well as whether any specific follow-up procedures were recommended, was recorded. Results: Out of 2,894 patients receiving coronary artery calcium scans, 247 (8.5%) received a report of a potentially significant incidental finding (See Table). Although more than half of the findings were lung-related, abnormalities were also identified in essentially every organ included in the CT scan images. A specific follow-up procedure was recommended in nearly two-thirds of findings. Conclusion: Among asymptomatic patients receiving a coronary artery calcium scan in the CorCal study, nearly one in ten received a report of a significant non-coronary incidental finding, of which almost two-thirds of those received a recommendation for a specific follow-up procedure. Whether this prevalence of incidental non-coronary findings justifies the time and expense of providing non-coronary over-reads for all coronary artery calcium scans remains to be determined.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4364754
Primary Topic
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4364754: Prevalence of Non-Coronary Incidental Findings Identified on CT Coronary Artery Calcium Scans Performed on Patients Enrolled in the CorCal Study. Do we need to keep track of them?

Leslie Iverson, Tyler Winslow, Viet T. Le, Heidi Thomas May et al.
Circulation
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
article

Abstract 4364754: Prevalence of Non-Coronary Incidental Findings Identified on CT Coronary Artery Calcium Scans Performed on Patients Enrolled in the CorCal Study. Do we need to keep track of them?

Leslie Iverson, Tyler Winslow, Viet T. Le, Heidi Thomas May, Joseph B. Muhlestein, Stacey Knight, Kirk U. Knowlton, Tami L. Bair, J. G. Anderson
article en

Abstract

Background: Coronary Artery Calcium CT scans provide a coronary artery calcium score that may be very useful in ascertaining a patient’s future cardiovascular risk. However, besides the coronary artery calcium score itself, the CT scan may also identify many potentially significant non-coronary cardiac and other organ-related “incidental” findings. Whether potentially clinically substantial incidental findings can be determined frequently enough to justify the extra work required to perform a non-coronary review of every coronary artery CT scan is not known. Methods: The CorCal study randomized asymptomatic, otherwise healthy patients to receive ASCVD risk stratification using either the results of the Pooled Cohort Equation or a CT coronary calcium scan. By protocol, in addition to calculating a coronary artery calcium score, the interpreting radiologists carefully evaluated and reported all identified potentially significant non-coronary incidental findings. The prevalence of these findings, as well as whether any specific follow-up procedures were recommended, was recorded. Results: Out of 2,894 patients receiving coronary artery calcium scans, 247 (8.5%) received a report of a potentially significant incidental finding (See Table). Although more than half of the findings were lung-related, abnormalities were also identified in essentially every organ included in the CT scan images. A specific follow-up procedure was recommended in nearly two-thirds of findings. Conclusion: Among asymptomatic patients receiving a coronary artery calcium scan in the CorCal study, nearly one in ten received a report of a significant non-coronary incidental finding, of which almost two-thirds of those received a recommendation for a specific follow-up procedure. Whether this prevalence of incidental non-coronary findings justifies the time and expense of providing non-coronary over-reads for all coronary artery calcium scans remains to be determined.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Intermountain Healthcare (US), Intermountain Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.