Abstract Sat601: Temporal Changes in Naloxone Recommendation in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Review of EMS State Protocols across the United States

Background: Naloxone administration has recently been associated with increased survival to hospital discharge for survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. However, this study was limited to retrospective data and selection bias. This study aims to determine if Emergency Medical Services (EMS) cardiac arrest protocols have changed related to recommendation of naloxone since recent interest in Narcan for overdose-associated out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OA-OHCA). Methods: We performed a cross-sectional review of statewide EMS protocols (STP) in the United States in 2018 and 2025 as a measure of EMS clinical standards related to naloxone use in OA-OHCA. We evaluated nontraumatic cardiac arrest protocols to determine if there was a change in their recommendation related to the use of naloxone. Protocols were downloaded from each state’s EMS website or, if a protocol was not publicly available, the state medical director was contacted. The institutional review board reviewed this study and deemed it to be exempt. Results: A 2025 STP was found for 32/51 (62.7%) states and a 2018 STP was found for 25/51 (49.0%) states. In 2025, 7/32 (21.9%) states recommended the use of naloxone in OA-OHCA in the cardiac arrest protocol. Of these, 3/7 (42.9%) states added this recommendation between 2018 and 2025. Vermont recommended naloxone because “it can be difficult to discern true cardiac arrest from an opioid overdose patient with deep CNS and cardiovascular depression.” Michigan and Nebraska recommended naloxone if opioid overdose is suspected. In 2025, 3/32 (9.4%) states explicitly stated there is no benefit in using naloxone in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in their cardiac arrest protocol. In non-cardiac arrest protocols, one additional state, New York, recommended naloxone in OHCA in their overdose protocol. Four additional states (Maine, DC, North Dakota, Wisconsin) explicitly stated there is no benefit in using naloxone in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Conclusion: Three states have altered cardiac arrest protocols since 2018 to recommend naloxone in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. While this study is limited to statewide protocols, this demonstrates variations in STP recommendations regarding naloxone administration given the weak evidence supporting its use. Limitations include that local and regional protocols are excluded and that STPs may not reflect EMS clinician clinical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.sat601
Primary Topic
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract Sat601: Temporal Changes in Naloxone Recommendation in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Review of EMS State Protocols across the United States

Sarah Perman, David Yi Yang, Katherine C. Couturier, Abe Tolkoff
Circulation
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
article

Abstract Sat601: Temporal Changes in Naloxone Recommendation in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Review of EMS State Protocols across the United States

Sarah Perman, David Yi Yang, Katherine C. Couturier, Abe Tolkoff
article en

Abstract

Background: Naloxone administration has recently been associated with increased survival to hospital discharge for survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. However, this study was limited to retrospective data and selection bias. This study aims to determine if Emergency Medical Services (EMS) cardiac arrest protocols have changed related to recommendation of naloxone since recent interest in Narcan for overdose-associated out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OA-OHCA). Methods: We performed a cross-sectional review of statewide EMS protocols (STP) in the United States in 2018 and 2025 as a measure of EMS clinical standards related to naloxone use in OA-OHCA. We evaluated nontraumatic cardiac arrest protocols to determine if there was a change in their recommendation related to the use of naloxone. Protocols were downloaded from each state’s EMS website or, if a protocol was not publicly available, the state medical director was contacted. The institutional review board reviewed this study and deemed it to be exempt. Results: A 2025 STP was found for 32/51 (62.7%) states and a 2018 STP was found for 25/51 (49.0%) states. In 2025, 7/32 (21.9%) states recommended the use of naloxone in OA-OHCA in the cardiac arrest protocol. Of these, 3/7 (42.9%) states added this recommendation between 2018 and 2025. Vermont recommended naloxone because “it can be difficult to discern true cardiac arrest from an opioid overdose patient with deep CNS and cardiovascular depression.” Michigan and Nebraska recommended naloxone if opioid overdose is suspected. In 2025, 3/32 (9.4%) states explicitly stated there is no benefit in using naloxone in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in their cardiac arrest protocol. In non-cardiac arrest protocols, one additional state, New York, recommended naloxone in OHCA in their overdose protocol. Four additional states (Maine, DC, North Dakota, Wisconsin) explicitly stated there is no benefit in using naloxone in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Conclusion: Three states have altered cardiac arrest protocols since 2018 to recommend naloxone in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. While this study is limited to statewide protocols, this demonstrates variations in STP recommendations regarding naloxone administration given the weak evidence supporting its use. Limitations include that local and regional protocols are excluded and that STPs may not reflect EMS clinician clinical practice.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Yale University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.