Abstract Sat606: Real-Time Geolocation Digital Platforms for the Availability of Automated External Defibrillators in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Systematic Review

Background: Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest (OHCA) is a leading cause of mortality worldwide, with survival heavily dependent on rapid Automated External Defibrillator (AED) access. While geolocation-based digital platforms have emerged to optimize AED deployment, their real-world availability and impact remain unclear. Research Question: What real-time digital geolocation platforms exist to improve the availability of AEDs in cases of OHCA? Aim: This systematic review identifies real-time digital geolocation platforms designed to improve AED availability in OHCA cases. Methods: A systematic search was conducted on April 21, 2025, in PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science. Gray literature, reference lists, and the first 15 pages of Google Scholar were also screened. The review followed PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Risk of bias was assessed using ROBINS-I for observational studies and RoB 2.0 for the randomized controlled trial (RCT). Results: We included eighteen studies (17 observational, 1 RCT) included smartphone apps (n=6), drones (n=3), dispatch systems (n=5), hybrid platforms (n=2), and geographic information system models (n=2). Platforms reduced response times (3.17–10.83 min); drones fastest (3.17–5.50 min), saving 3.42 min versus Emergency Medical Services (EMS). Survival improved 1–20.4% (highest with bystander alerts, mostly through smartphone apps); AED use pre-EMS increased 1–49.5%. Drones achieved 67.5% coverage; bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) rose to 14–59.8% (30.9% retrieved AEDs when alerted). Analysis showed 67% Return of Spontaneous Circulation (ROSC) with guided CPR and 49.5% urban AED retrieval, versus rural delays (466.6±252.6 vs. 402.4±163.3 seconds) and lower AED use (9.4% vs. 18.5%). RoB 2.0 showed moderate risk for RCT; ROBINS-I showed 88% moderate, 12% serious risk for observational studies. Conclusions: Real-time geolocation platforms could improve OHCA outcomes by enhancing AED availability, reducing response times, and increasing survival. Drones achieved fastest responses; smartphone alerts showed highest survival improvements. Urban-rural disparities exist. Despite limitations, these platforms represent promising advancements requiring standardized implementation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.sat606
Primary Topic
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract Sat606: Real-Time Geolocation Digital Platforms for the Availability of Automated External Defibrillators in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Systematic Review

Jenyfer María Fuentes‐Mendoza, Fritz Fidel Váscones-Román, Wagner Rios-García, Lluís Quintana et al.
Circulation
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
article

Abstract Sat606: Real-Time Geolocation Digital Platforms for the Availability of Automated External Defibrillators in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Systematic Review

Jenyfer María Fuentes‐Mendoza, Fritz Fidel Váscones-Román, Wagner Rios-García, Lluís Quintana, Abel Torres, Sashenka Silva-Jiménez, Diana Alejandra Perales-Ledesma
article en

Abstract

Background: Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest (OHCA) is a leading cause of mortality worldwide, with survival heavily dependent on rapid Automated External Defibrillator (AED) access. While geolocation-based digital platforms have emerged to optimize AED deployment, their real-world availability and impact remain unclear. Research Question: What real-time digital geolocation platforms exist to improve the availability of AEDs in cases of OHCA? Aim: This systematic review identifies real-time digital geolocation platforms designed to improve AED availability in OHCA cases. Methods: A systematic search was conducted on April 21, 2025, in PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science. Gray literature, reference lists, and the first 15 pages of Google Scholar were also screened. The review followed PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Risk of bias was assessed using ROBINS-I for observational studies and RoB 2.0 for the randomized controlled trial (RCT). Results: We included eighteen studies (17 observational, 1 RCT) included smartphone apps (n=6), drones (n=3), dispatch systems (n=5), hybrid platforms (n=2), and geographic information system models (n=2). Platforms reduced response times (3.17–10.83 min); drones fastest (3.17–5.50 min), saving 3.42 min versus Emergency Medical Services (EMS). Survival improved 1–20.4% (highest with bystander alerts, mostly through smartphone apps); AED use pre-EMS increased 1–49.5%. Drones achieved 67.5% coverage; bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) rose to 14–59.8% (30.9% retrieved AEDs when alerted). Analysis showed 67% Return of Spontaneous Circulation (ROSC) with guided CPR and 49.5% urban AED retrieval, versus rural delays (466.6±252.6 vs. 402.4±163.3 seconds) and lower AED use (9.4% vs. 18.5%). RoB 2.0 showed moderate risk for RCT; ROBINS-I showed 88% moderate, 12% serious risk for observational studies. Conclusions: Real-time geolocation platforms could improve OHCA outcomes by enhancing AED availability, reducing response times, and increasing survival. Drones achieved fastest responses; smartphone alerts showed highest survival improvements. Urban-rural disparities exist. Despite limitations, these platforms represent promising advancements requiring standardized implementation.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
University of Cuenca (EC), Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia (PE), Universidad Científica del Sur (PE), Saint Aloysius Gonzaga National University (PE), Universidad Ricardo Palma (PE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.