Abstract 4362160: Validation of Ring-Type Cuffless Blood Pressure (BP) Monitoring Device for Detecting Awake-Asleep BP Variations Compared to Ambulatory BP Monitoring Device

Introduction: Based on recommendations for validating cuffless BP devices by the European Society of Hypertension (ESH), this is the first validation study assessing the accuracy of CART BP, a ring-type cuffless blood pressure (BP) monitoring device, in detecting awake-asleep BP variations compared to conventional 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM). Unlike traditional cuff-based methods, the ESH validation criteria for cuffless devices emphasize assessing the device's capability to accurately track variations in BP, crucial for their clinical applicability. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that the CART BP device would reliably detect awake-asleep BP variations compared to ABPM, demonstrating a high correlation (correlation coefficient ≥0.7) within an error margin of 5±8 mmHg (mean±standard deviation). Methods: Participants were consecutively selected from initially recruited patients to ensure compliance with ESH recommendations: 30% with systolic BP (SBP) ≥130 mmHg and diastolic BP (DBP) ≥80 mmHg, and 30% with SBP <120 mmHg and DBP <70 mmHg, with the remaining 40% included sequentially based on recruitment order. Calibration of the CART BP device was performed at least 24 hours prior to monitoring. Participants simultaneously wore both the CART BP and ABPM devices on the non-dominant arm for 24 hours. Mean SBP/DBP values were calculated from ABPM and CART BP readings. The SBP/DBP changes between awake and asleep periods were compared. Results: Of the 84 initially recruited participants, 35 were included in the final analysis: 30% (N=11) had SBP/DBP ≥130/80 mmHg, 30% (N=11) had SBP/DBP <120/70 mmHg, and the remaining 40% (N=13) were enrolled sequentially. The awake-asleep SBP/DBP changes were 15.61±8.74 / 11.35±6.22 mmHg with ABPM, and 14.15±9.18 / 11.61±8.85 mmHg with CART BP. Correlation coefficients were 0.73 for SBP and 0.74 for DBP (p<0.001 for both). Mean differences in awake-asleep BP changes between CART BP and ABPM were -1.46±6.57 mmHg for SBP and 0.26±5.98 mmHg for DBP, with no significant differences (p=0.197 and 0.798, respectively). The prevalence of dippers (74.3% VS 60%, p=0.131) was comparable between both devices. Conclusion: CART BP demonstrated acceptable accuracy in detecting diurnal BP variations, aligning with ESH validation standards for cuffless BP monitoring devices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4362160
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4362160: Validation of Ring-Type Cuffless Blood Pressure (BP) Monitoring Device for Detecting Awake-Asleep BP Variations Compared to Ambulatory BP Monitoring Device

Bon–Kwon Koo, S.-T. Lee, Hae-Young Lee
Circulation
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
article

Abstract 4362160: Validation of Ring-Type Cuffless Blood Pressure (BP) Monitoring Device for Detecting Awake-Asleep BP Variations Compared to Ambulatory BP Monitoring Device

Bon–Kwon Koo, S.-T. Lee, Hae-Young Lee
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Based on recommendations for validating cuffless BP devices by the European Society of Hypertension (ESH), this is the first validation study assessing the accuracy of CART BP, a ring-type cuffless blood pressure (BP) monitoring device, in detecting awake-asleep BP variations compared to conventional 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM). Unlike traditional cuff-based methods, the ESH validation criteria for cuffless devices emphasize assessing the device's capability to accurately track variations in BP, crucial for their clinical applicability. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that the CART BP device would reliably detect awake-asleep BP variations compared to ABPM, demonstrating a high correlation (correlation coefficient ≥0.7) within an error margin of 5±8 mmHg (mean±standard deviation). Methods: Participants were consecutively selected from initially recruited patients to ensure compliance with ESH recommendations: 30% with systolic BP (SBP) ≥130 mmHg and diastolic BP (DBP) ≥80 mmHg, and 30% with SBP <120 mmHg and DBP <70 mmHg, with the remaining 40% included sequentially based on recruitment order. Calibration of the CART BP device was performed at least 24 hours prior to monitoring. Participants simultaneously wore both the CART BP and ABPM devices on the non-dominant arm for 24 hours. Mean SBP/DBP values were calculated from ABPM and CART BP readings. The SBP/DBP changes between awake and asleep periods were compared. Results: Of the 84 initially recruited participants, 35 were included in the final analysis: 30% (N=11) had SBP/DBP ≥130/80 mmHg, 30% (N=11) had SBP/DBP <120/70 mmHg, and the remaining 40% (N=13) were enrolled sequentially. The awake-asleep SBP/DBP changes were 15.61±8.74 / 11.35±6.22 mmHg with ABPM, and 14.15±9.18 / 11.61±8.85 mmHg with CART BP. Correlation coefficients were 0.73 for SBP and 0.74 for DBP (p<0.001 for both). Mean differences in awake-asleep BP changes between CART BP and ABPM were -1.46±6.57 mmHg for SBP and 0.26±5.98 mmHg for DBP, with no significant differences (p=0.197 and 0.798, respectively). The prevalence of dippers (74.3% VS 60%, p=0.131) was comparable between both devices. Conclusion: CART BP demonstrated acceptable accuracy in detecting diurnal BP variations, aligning with ESH validation standards for cuffless BP monitoring devices.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Seoul National University Hospital (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.