Abstract 4360376: Effect Of Inclisiran-based Treatment Strategy, In Combination With Individually Optimized Statin Therapy, On Quality Of Life And Muscle-related Pain vs. Standard of Care: Exploratory Outcomes From The VICTORION-Difference Study

Background: Inclisiran provides sustained and effective LDL-C reduction in individuals with hyperlipidemia with a favorable long-term safety profile; however, its impact on QoL remains unknown. The VICTORION-Difference study evaluated the early efficacy, safety, as well as QoL outcomes with inclisiran vs. placebo on top of individually optimized lipid-lowering therapy (ioLLT; standard of care [SOC]) in individuals with hypercholesterolemia who have not achieved guideline-recommended LDL-C goals. Research question: Whether inclisiran-based treatment strategy vs. SOC reduces muscle-related adverse events (MRAEs) and days with pain experienced. Data on additional key secondary and exploratory endpoints for efficacy and safety, including LDL-C reduction, pain-related QoL scores, AEs and serious AEs will be presented. Methods: This phase 4, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial included adults with hypercholesterolemia at high or very high CV risk on maximally tolerated dose (MTD) of statins. Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive subcutaneous injections of 300 mg inclisiran sodium or placebo on top of SOC at Days 1, 90, and 270. At randomization, participants received open-label rosuvastatin as background ioLLT; starting dose of 5 mg/day or 10 mg/day and sequentially titrated to the MTD. A logistic regression model analyzed the proportion of participants experiencing ≥1 MRAE from Day 1 to Day 360, while a negative binomial model assessed the annualized number of pain days. The study was powered for the key secondary endpoint related to MRAEs. Results: A total of 1770 individuals (mean age, 63.7 years) were randomized to receive study medication (inclisiran, n=898; SOC, n=872), with 92.3% of participants classified as having very high CV risk. Fewer participants in the inclisiran vs. SOC arm experienced a MRAE (11.9% vs. 19.2%; odds ratio=0.57; 95% CI: 0.43, 0.74). Participants receiving inclisiran experienced numerically fewer days with pain vs. SOC (198.63 vs. 214.51; rate ratio: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.81, 1.06; Figure ). Conclusion: VICTORION-Difference is the largest LDL-C–lowering study from the inclisiran clinical development program so far, and the first to evaluate the effect of inclisiran vs. placebo on top of SOC using patient-centric QoL scores as secondary endpoints. Overall, inclisiran-based treatment strategy vs. SOC led to significantly fewer MRAEs and a numerical reduction in the number of days individuals with hypercholesterolemia experienced pain.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4360376
Primary Topic
Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4360376: Effect Of Inclisiran-based Treatment Strategy, In Combination With Individually Optimized Statin Therapy, On Quality Of Life And Muscle-related Pain vs. Standard of Care: Exploratory Outcomes From The VICTORION-Difference Study

Lawrence Lubyayi, Alicia Esteban, Christian Hentschke, Ursula Kassner et al.
Circulation
Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
article

Abstract 4360376: Effect Of Inclisiran-based Treatment Strategy, In Combination With Individually Optimized Statin Therapy, On Quality Of Life And Muscle-related Pain vs. Standard of Care: Exploratory Outcomes From The VICTORION-Difference Study

Lawrence Lubyayi, Alicia Esteban, Christian Hentschke, Ursula Kassner, Maciej Banach, Assya Achouba, Ulrike Schatz, Ephraim B. Winzer, Ulf Landmesser, Bernd Nowak, Ioanna Gouni‐Berthold
article en

Abstract

Background: Inclisiran provides sustained and effective LDL-C reduction in individuals with hyperlipidemia with a favorable long-term safety profile; however, its impact on QoL remains unknown. The VICTORION-Difference study evaluated the early efficacy, safety, as well as QoL outcomes with inclisiran vs. placebo on top of individually optimized lipid-lowering therapy (ioLLT; standard of care [SOC]) in individuals with hypercholesterolemia who have not achieved guideline-recommended LDL-C goals. Research question: Whether inclisiran-based treatment strategy vs. SOC reduces muscle-related adverse events (MRAEs) and days with pain experienced. Data on additional key secondary and exploratory endpoints for efficacy and safety, including LDL-C reduction, pain-related QoL scores, AEs and serious AEs will be presented. Methods: This phase 4, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial included adults with hypercholesterolemia at high or very high CV risk on maximally tolerated dose (MTD) of statins. Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive subcutaneous injections of 300 mg inclisiran sodium or placebo on top of SOC at Days 1, 90, and 270. At randomization, participants received open-label rosuvastatin as background ioLLT; starting dose of 5 mg/day or 10 mg/day and sequentially titrated to the MTD. A logistic regression model analyzed the proportion of participants experiencing ≥1 MRAE from Day 1 to Day 360, while a negative binomial model assessed the annualized number of pain days. The study was powered for the key secondary endpoint related to MRAEs. Results: A total of 1770 individuals (mean age, 63.7 years) were randomized to receive study medication (inclisiran, n=898; SOC, n=872), with 92.3% of participants classified as having very high CV risk. Fewer participants in the inclisiran vs. SOC arm experienced a MRAE (11.9% vs. 19.2%; odds ratio=0.57; 95% CI: 0.43, 0.74). Participants receiving inclisiran experienced numerically fewer days with pain vs. SOC (198.63 vs. 214.51; rate ratio: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.81, 1.06; Figure ). Conclusion: VICTORION-Difference is the largest LDL-C–lowering study from the inclisiran clinical development program so far, and the first to evaluate the effect of inclisiran vs. placebo on top of SOC using patient-centric QoL scores as secondary endpoints. Overall, inclisiran-based treatment strategy vs. SOC led to significantly fewer MRAEs and a numerical reduction in the number of days individuals with hypercholesterolemia experienced pain.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin (PL), Novartis (Switzerland) (CH), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE), Novartis (Germany) (DE), Cardiovascular Center Bethanien (DE), Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité (DE), University Hospital Leipzig (DE), Novartis (United Kingdom) (GB), University Hospital Cologne (DE), Technische Universität Dresden (DE), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.