Abstract 4363403: The Effect of Tirzepatide versus Semaglutide on Post-Operative Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetics Following Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Background: Post-operative cardiovascular outcomes after Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG) in patients with type 2 diabetes pose unique and significant clinical challenges. Although both tirzepatide, a dual GLP-1/GIP receptor agonist, and semaglutide, a GLP-1 receptor agonist, have demonstrated cardiovascular benefits in diabetic patients, their comparative effectiveness in this population post-CABG remains unclear- a gap this study aims to address. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that tirzepatide provides superior protection against post-operative complications compared to semaglutide in diabetic patients post-CABG based on the premise that dual agonism may offer enhanced metabolic benefits beyond GLP-1 receptor activation alone. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study utilizing the TriNetX global federated health research network (2022-2024), we analyzed 3,667 propensity score-matched pairs of type 2 diabetic adults (≥18 years old) on either tirzepatide or semaglutide after undergoing CABG. Outcomes measured at 6 months and 3 years included post-operative complications, cardiovascular outcomes, cerebrovascular outcomes, and healthcare utilization. Results: At 6 months following CABG, tirzepatide use decreased adverse cardiovascular outcomes such as myocardial infarction (7.9% vs. 10.2%, HR=0.833, 95%CI=0.686-1.012, p=0.007) and MACE (51.6% vs. 60.9%, HR=0.889, 95%CI=0.822-0.960, p<0.001) compared to semaglutide. Statistical significance was maintained at 3 years post-CABG in MACE outcomes (63.7% vs. 79.1%, HR=0.911, 95%CI=0.850-0.976, p<0.001). Superior cerebrovascular protection with tirzepatide was also seen at 6 months following CABG with lower rates of cerebral infarction (5.1% vs. 7.5%, HR=0.733, 95%CI=0.580-0.927, p=0.001) and cerebrovascular disease (13.0% vs. 18.4%, HR=0.758, 95%CI=0.645-0.879, p<0.001) compared to semaglutide and sustained at 3 years. Both time points also showed tirzeptide use to have decreased readmissions, emergency visits, and all-cause mortality (3.1% vs. 7.5% at 3 years, HR=0.595, 95%CI=0.449-0.787, p<0.001). Conclusions: Tirzepatide demonstrates superior cardiovascular and cerebrovascular protection, reduced healthcare utilization, and lower mortality compared to semaglutide in diabetic patients after CABG. These findings highlight the postoperative potential of GLP-1/GIP receptor agonism in this high-risk population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4363403
Primary Topic
Diabetes Treatment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4363403: The Effect of Tirzepatide versus Semaglutide on Post-Operative Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetics Following Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Ahmed Abdelmaksoud, Sandeep Chunduri, Danielle Tatum, Abdallah S. Attia et al.
Circulation
Diabetes Treatment and Management
article

Abstract 4363403: The Effect of Tirzepatide versus Semaglutide on Post-Operative Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetics Following Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Ahmed Abdelmaksoud, Sandeep Chunduri, Danielle Tatum, Abdallah S. Attia, Jamil Borgi, Milee Patel, M. Hussein, Eman A. Toraih, Ghassan Bidaoui, Mohammad H. Hussein
article en

Abstract

Background: Post-operative cardiovascular outcomes after Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG) in patients with type 2 diabetes pose unique and significant clinical challenges. Although both tirzepatide, a dual GLP-1/GIP receptor agonist, and semaglutide, a GLP-1 receptor agonist, have demonstrated cardiovascular benefits in diabetic patients, their comparative effectiveness in this population post-CABG remains unclear- a gap this study aims to address. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that tirzepatide provides superior protection against post-operative complications compared to semaglutide in diabetic patients post-CABG based on the premise that dual agonism may offer enhanced metabolic benefits beyond GLP-1 receptor activation alone. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study utilizing the TriNetX global federated health research network (2022-2024), we analyzed 3,667 propensity score-matched pairs of type 2 diabetic adults (≥18 years old) on either tirzepatide or semaglutide after undergoing CABG. Outcomes measured at 6 months and 3 years included post-operative complications, cardiovascular outcomes, cerebrovascular outcomes, and healthcare utilization. Results: At 6 months following CABG, tirzepatide use decreased adverse cardiovascular outcomes such as myocardial infarction (7.9% vs. 10.2%, HR=0.833, 95%CI=0.686-1.012, p=0.007) and MACE (51.6% vs. 60.9%, HR=0.889, 95%CI=0.822-0.960, p<0.001) compared to semaglutide. Statistical significance was maintained at 3 years post-CABG in MACE outcomes (63.7% vs. 79.1%, HR=0.911, 95%CI=0.850-0.976, p<0.001). Superior cerebrovascular protection with tirzepatide was also seen at 6 months following CABG with lower rates of cerebral infarction (5.1% vs. 7.5%, HR=0.733, 95%CI=0.580-0.927, p=0.001) and cerebrovascular disease (13.0% vs. 18.4%, HR=0.758, 95%CI=0.645-0.879, p<0.001) compared to semaglutide and sustained at 3 years. Both time points also showed tirzeptide use to have decreased readmissions, emergency visits, and all-cause mortality (3.1% vs. 7.5% at 3 years, HR=0.595, 95%CI=0.449-0.787, p<0.001). Conclusions: Tirzepatide demonstrates superior cardiovascular and cerebrovascular protection, reduced healthcare utilization, and lower mortality compared to semaglutide in diabetic patients after CABG. These findings highlight the postoperative potential of GLP-1/GIP receptor agonism in this high-risk population.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
University of California, Riverside (US), Tulane University (US), Ochsner Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Diabetes Treatment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.