Abstract 4367864: Impella 5.5 Therapy as Bridge Therapy for Delayed Ventricular Septal Defect Repair

Introduction/Background: Ventricular Septal Defect (VSD) is a well-known and often fatal complication of myocardial infarction (MI), particularly when presentation is delayed. The mortality of patients treated with medical therapy alone approaches 100%. Intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) remains first-line temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS) as bridge therapy for surgical repair. However, at times counter pulsation alone does not provide adequate hemodynamic support. We present a single center experience using Impella 5.5 as a bridge to delayed surgical repair. Research Hypothesis: Impella 5.5 can be effective bridge therapy for delayed VSD repair in patients inadequately supported by other tMCS. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of all patients with post-MI VSD implanted with Impella 5.5 from 2021-2025. We evaluated demographic data, type and duration of tMCS support, development of refractory hypoxemia, survival, and complications related to tMCS. Results: Seven patients with post MI VSD were reviewed, mean age was 63.9, six patients were male, one patient was female, five patients had RCA infarct, and two patients had LAD infarct. Two of the seven patients were deemed poor surgical candidates due to stroke following impella 5.5 placement and mitral valve endocarditis, these patients died shortly after Impella 5.5 support was weaned. (Figure 1, Patients 1 and 2 respectively). The remaining five patients (Figure 1, Patients A-E) had stability or improvement in their hemometabolic profiles following placement of Impella 5.5 and underwent repair of VSD with bovine patch. For patients A-E, the average time on tMCS was 15 +/- 8.1 days and the average time on Impella 5.5 was 11 +/- 7.2 days. Known survival in post-operative group is 100% to date (Table 1). Conclusion: Standard of care for post-MI VSD involves immediate hemodynamic and hemometabolic resuscitation, and delayed surgical repair to optimize operative success. While IABP is standard of care, patients may require expedited surgery due to hemodynamic or hemometabolic instability, which results in unfavorable conditions for patch durability. Despite small case series, guidelines for IMPELLA 5.5 state post-MI VSD as a contraindication for Impella placement as it could cause worsening right to left shunting. Notably, no patients experienced refractory hypoxemia. This case series suggests Impella 5.5. may be the optimal strategy for bridging to delayed surgical repair in post-MI VSD.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4367864
Primary Topic
Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4367864: Impella 5.5 Therapy as Bridge Therapy for Delayed Ventricular Septal Defect Repair

Wyatt Klass, Roy Sriwattanakomen, Alexis Barnes, Steven E. Reís et al.
Circulation
Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair
article

Abstract 4367864: Impella 5.5 Therapy as Bridge Therapy for Delayed Ventricular Septal Defect Repair

Wyatt Klass, Roy Sriwattanakomen, Alexis Barnes, Steven E. Reís, Mohamed Abdullah, David Kaczorowski, Gavin Hickey, Bronson Kunzler
article en

Abstract

Introduction/Background: Ventricular Septal Defect (VSD) is a well-known and often fatal complication of myocardial infarction (MI), particularly when presentation is delayed. The mortality of patients treated with medical therapy alone approaches 100%. Intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) remains first-line temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS) as bridge therapy for surgical repair. However, at times counter pulsation alone does not provide adequate hemodynamic support. We present a single center experience using Impella 5.5 as a bridge to delayed surgical repair. Research Hypothesis: Impella 5.5 can be effective bridge therapy for delayed VSD repair in patients inadequately supported by other tMCS. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of all patients with post-MI VSD implanted with Impella 5.5 from 2021-2025. We evaluated demographic data, type and duration of tMCS support, development of refractory hypoxemia, survival, and complications related to tMCS. Results: Seven patients with post MI VSD were reviewed, mean age was 63.9, six patients were male, one patient was female, five patients had RCA infarct, and two patients had LAD infarct. Two of the seven patients were deemed poor surgical candidates due to stroke following impella 5.5 placement and mitral valve endocarditis, these patients died shortly after Impella 5.5 support was weaned. (Figure 1, Patients 1 and 2 respectively). The remaining five patients (Figure 1, Patients A-E) had stability or improvement in their hemometabolic profiles following placement of Impella 5.5 and underwent repair of VSD with bovine patch. For patients A-E, the average time on tMCS was 15 +/- 8.1 days and the average time on Impella 5.5 was 11 +/- 7.2 days. Known survival in post-operative group is 100% to date (Table 1). Conclusion: Standard of care for post-MI VSD involves immediate hemodynamic and hemometabolic resuscitation, and delayed surgical repair to optimize operative success. While IABP is standard of care, patients may require expedited surgery due to hemodynamic or hemometabolic instability, which results in unfavorable conditions for patch durability. Despite small case series, guidelines for IMPELLA 5.5 state post-MI VSD as a contraindication for Impella placement as it could cause worsening right to left shunting. Notably, no patients experienced refractory hypoxemia. This case series suggests Impella 5.5. may be the optimal strategy for bridging to delayed surgical repair in post-MI VSD.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.