Abstract 4366513: Therapeutic Precision vs. Cardiac Risk: A Meta-Analytic Review of Osimertinib in NSCLC

Introduction: Targeted therapies have revolutionized cancer treatment by focusing on specific oncogenic drivers. Osimertinib, a third-generation EGFR inhibitor, was developed to overcome resistance from T790M mutations. While it provides significant benefits, there have been reports linking it to cardiotoxic effects, which complicates attributing these events solely to the drug due to concurrent treatments. This study aims to clarify the direct cardiotoxicity of Osimertinib by reviewing trials and cohort studies involving its monotherapy. Methods: We performed a combined meta-analysis to evaluate cardiovascular toxicity in EGFR-mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer patients treated with Osimertinib. Data were extracted from nine studies, including pivotal clinical trials (ADAURA, FLAURA, AURA2, MARIPOSA) and observational cohorts (e.g., Patel et al., Lin et al., Le et al., Goss et al.). The analysis included (1) a single-arm meta-analysis estimating the incidence of cardiotoxic events from clinical trials, and (2) a comparative meta-analysis using data from two randomized controlled trials and one retrospective cohort comparing Osimertinib with earlier-generation EGFR inhibitors. Random-effects models were used to calculate pooled proportions and relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity was assessed using I 2 , t 2 , and Cochran’s Q. Results: In the single-arm analysis, a total of 2,518 patients receiving Osimertinib monotherapy were included in the pooled analysis. The most frequent adverse events with Osimertinib were QT prolongation (7%), heart failure (5%), arrhythmias (3%), and LVEF decrease (4%). Less frequent events included myocardial infarction (MI) (<1%). In a comparative analysis of Osimertinib versus other EGFR inhibitors, involving a total of 1,815 participants, Osimertinib showed increased risks of heart failure (RR = 4.48), arrhythmias (RR = 3.30), and LVEF decrease (RR = 3.10) compared to other EGFR inhibitors. No significant differences were observed for MI or pericardial effusion. Most outcomes showed low heterogeneity (I 2 = 0%). Conclusion: Osimertinib is associated with a higher risk of heart failure, arrhythmias, and LVEF decline. Although these events are infrequent, the potential severity warrants proactive cardiac monitoring for patients, especially those with existing cardiovascular risk factors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4366513
Primary Topic
Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4366513: Therapeutic Precision vs. Cardiac Risk: A Meta-Analytic Review of Osimertinib in NSCLC

Alan García, Abdul Mueez Alam Kayani, Ricky E. Lemus-Zamora, Brijesh Patel et al.
Circulation
Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
article

Abstract 4366513: Therapeutic Precision vs. Cardiac Risk: A Meta-Analytic Review of Osimertinib in NSCLC

Alan García, Abdul Mueez Alam Kayani, Ricky E. Lemus-Zamora, Brijesh Patel, Richard Salama Frisbie, Thomas Fretz
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Targeted therapies have revolutionized cancer treatment by focusing on specific oncogenic drivers. Osimertinib, a third-generation EGFR inhibitor, was developed to overcome resistance from T790M mutations. While it provides significant benefits, there have been reports linking it to cardiotoxic effects, which complicates attributing these events solely to the drug due to concurrent treatments. This study aims to clarify the direct cardiotoxicity of Osimertinib by reviewing trials and cohort studies involving its monotherapy. Methods: We performed a combined meta-analysis to evaluate cardiovascular toxicity in EGFR-mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer patients treated with Osimertinib. Data were extracted from nine studies, including pivotal clinical trials (ADAURA, FLAURA, AURA2, MARIPOSA) and observational cohorts (e.g., Patel et al., Lin et al., Le et al., Goss et al.). The analysis included (1) a single-arm meta-analysis estimating the incidence of cardiotoxic events from clinical trials, and (2) a comparative meta-analysis using data from two randomized controlled trials and one retrospective cohort comparing Osimertinib with earlier-generation EGFR inhibitors. Random-effects models were used to calculate pooled proportions and relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity was assessed using I 2 , t 2 , and Cochran’s Q. Results: In the single-arm analysis, a total of 2,518 patients receiving Osimertinib monotherapy were included in the pooled analysis. The most frequent adverse events with Osimertinib were QT prolongation (7%), heart failure (5%), arrhythmias (3%), and LVEF decrease (4%). Less frequent events included myocardial infarction (MI) (<1%). In a comparative analysis of Osimertinib versus other EGFR inhibitors, involving a total of 1,815 participants, Osimertinib showed increased risks of heart failure (RR = 4.48), arrhythmias (RR = 3.30), and LVEF decrease (RR = 3.10) compared to other EGFR inhibitors. No significant differences were observed for MI or pericardial effusion. Most outcomes showed low heterogeneity (I 2 = 0%). Conclusion: Osimertinib is associated with a higher risk of heart failure, arrhythmias, and LVEF decline. Although these events are infrequent, the potential severity warrants proactive cardiac monitoring for patients, especially those with existing cardiovascular risk factors.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán (MX), AdventHealth Tampa (US), Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US), Indiana University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.