Abstract 4362170: Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Electrocardiogram for Detecting Systolic Dysfunction in Left Bundle Branch Block: Impact of Training Strategies and Transfer Learning

Background: Left bundle branch block (LBBB) is a common ECG abnormality linked to left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD), yet its altered conduction pattern complicates ECG-based diagnosis. While artificial-intelligence enabled ECG (AI-ECG) show promise for LVSD screening, it is unclear whether subgroup-specific training or transfer learning improves performance. Hypothesis: We hypothesize that diagnostic performance for detecting LVSD in LBBB patients varies depending on the model development strategy, including training cohort selection and transfer learning approaches. Methods: We developed four AI-ECG models using 364,845 ECGs: (1) a general model, (2) a model trained on automatically extracted LBBB cases, (3) a model trained on expert-validated LBBB ECGs, and (4) a transfer learning model fine-tuned on expert-curated LBBB data. All models were externally validated on 1,334 ECGs from LBBB patients at a separate hospital. LVSD was defined as ejection fraction ≤40%. Performance was assessed using AUROC, sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values. Results: The transfer learning model achieved the highest AUROC (0.903; 95% CI: 0.887–0.918), followed by the general model (0.899; 95% CI: 0.883–0.915). Models trained solely on LBBB datasets performed worse (AUROC 0.879 and 0.841). The general model had the highest sensitivity (96.6%), while the transfer learning model had greater specificity (90.3%) and PPV (89.4%). ( Figure 1 ) Kaplan–Meier analysis showed that AI-ECG false positives had significantly higher risk of future LVSD than true negatives (38% vs. 8.5%, p<0.0001). ( Figure 2 ) We further explored ECG characteristics of LVSD in LBBB patients to evaluate model explainability. ( Figure 3 ) Conclusions: A general AI-ECG model effectively detects LVSD in LBBB patients, and transfer learning offers modest improvement. Model development strategies, especially training cohort composition, influence diagnostic performance in high-risk subgroups. AI-ECG holds promise for screening and prognostication in LBBB populations, warranting further validation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4362170
Primary Topic
ECG Monitoring and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4362170: Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Electrocardiogram for Detecting Systolic Dysfunction in Left Bundle Branch Block: Impact of Training Strategies and Transfer Learning

Hak Seung Lee, Jong-Hwan Jang, Min Sung Lee, Sora Kang et al.
Circulation
ECG Monitoring and Analysis
article

Abstract 4362170: Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Electrocardiogram for Detecting Systolic Dysfunction in Left Bundle Branch Block: Impact of Training Strategies and Transfer Learning

Hak Seung Lee, Jong-Hwan Jang, Min Sung Lee, Sora Kang, Jeong Min Son, Soo Youn Lee, Kyung‐Hee Kim, Jeong In Kwon, Ah-Hyun Yoo, Ga In Han, Yong-Yeon Jo
article en

Abstract

Background: Left bundle branch block (LBBB) is a common ECG abnormality linked to left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD), yet its altered conduction pattern complicates ECG-based diagnosis. While artificial-intelligence enabled ECG (AI-ECG) show promise for LVSD screening, it is unclear whether subgroup-specific training or transfer learning improves performance. Hypothesis: We hypothesize that diagnostic performance for detecting LVSD in LBBB patients varies depending on the model development strategy, including training cohort selection and transfer learning approaches. Methods: We developed four AI-ECG models using 364,845 ECGs: (1) a general model, (2) a model trained on automatically extracted LBBB cases, (3) a model trained on expert-validated LBBB ECGs, and (4) a transfer learning model fine-tuned on expert-curated LBBB data. All models were externally validated on 1,334 ECGs from LBBB patients at a separate hospital. LVSD was defined as ejection fraction ≤40%. Performance was assessed using AUROC, sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values. Results: The transfer learning model achieved the highest AUROC (0.903; 95% CI: 0.887–0.918), followed by the general model (0.899; 95% CI: 0.883–0.915). Models trained solely on LBBB datasets performed worse (AUROC 0.879 and 0.841). The general model had the highest sensitivity (96.6%), while the transfer learning model had greater specificity (90.3%) and PPV (89.4%). ( Figure 1 ) Kaplan–Meier analysis showed that AI-ECG false positives had significantly higher risk of future LVSD than true negatives (38% vs. 8.5%, p<0.0001). ( Figure 2 ) We further explored ECG characteristics of LVSD in LBBB patients to evaluate model explainability. ( Figure 3 ) Conclusions: A general AI-ECG model effectively detects LVSD in LBBB patients, and transfer learning offers modest improvement. Model development strategies, especially training cohort composition, influence diagnostic performance in high-risk subgroups. AI-ECG holds promise for screening and prognostication in LBBB populations, warranting further validation.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Seoul Medical Center (KR), Sejong General Hospital (KR), Advanced Resources International (United States) (US), Incheon Medical Center (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
ECG Monitoring and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.