Abstract 4356757: Double Trouble: Impact of Viral Pneumonia on Mortality and Clinical Outcomes in Patients Hospitalized with Pulmonary Embolism: A Nationwide Analysis (2016 – 2021)

Background: Pulmonary Embolism (PE) is a potentially life-threatening condition that warrants careful consideration of its risk factors and associated comorbidities. Viral pneumonia (VP) has been increasingly recognized as a significant risk factor for PE. The interplay between severe viral infection and coagulation abnormalities can lead to a higher incidence of thrombotic complications, multi-organ failure, and increased mortality among hospitalized patients. Objective: To evaluate the impact of concomitant VP on outcomes in patients admitted with PE in the United States between the years 2016 - 2021. Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed data from 1,120,609.4 patients hospitalized with PE without VP and 6,370.0 patients with concurrent VP. Multivariable logistic and linear regression models were utilized, adjusting for factors including age, gender, race, Charlson Comorbidity Index score, median household income, hospital region, and teaching status. The analysis focused on outcomes such as in-hospital mortality, hospital charges, complications, and length of stay. Results: Patients hospitalized with PE and concurrent VP had significantly higher odds of in-hospital mortality compared to those without VP (Adjusted OR: 2.37; 95% CI: 1.88–2.99; P < .01). Hospital charges were also higher in the VP group—by $22,443.66 unadjusted (95% CI: $15,826.40–$29,060.91; P < .01) and $23,881.98 after OR adjustment (95% CI: $17,191.99–$30,571.98; P < .01). This may be related to a longer average hospital stay, which was 1.81 days greater in the VP group (AOR: 1.81; 95% CI: 1.46–2.17; P < .01), though not clinically significant. Complications were more common in PE patients with VP, including acute cor pulmonale (AOR: 1.62; 95% CI: 1.51–1.74; P < .01), cardiac arrest (AOR: 1.67; 95% CI: 1.19–2.34; P < .01), and hypoxic respiratory failure (AOR: 3.35; 95% CI: 2.98–3.76; P < .01). No significant differences were observed in the odds of ventricular arrhythmia, right heart failure, or cardiogenic shock between the two groups. Conclusion: Patients hospitalized with PE and VP face higher risks of death, longer hospital stays, more complications, and increased healthcare costs. These findings underscore the importance of early recognition and preventive measures—like flu vaccination—to reduce the impact of viral infections on thrombotic events.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4356757
Primary Topic
Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4356757: Double Trouble: Impact of Viral Pneumonia on Mortality and Clinical Outcomes in Patients Hospitalized with Pulmonary Embolism: A Nationwide Analysis (2016 – 2021)

Ajibola Adedayo, Muneeb Ahmed, Sai Anusha Akella, Hiram Muriuki et al.
Circulation
Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
article

Abstract 4356757: Double Trouble: Impact of Viral Pneumonia on Mortality and Clinical Outcomes in Patients Hospitalized with Pulmonary Embolism: A Nationwide Analysis (2016 – 2021)

Ajibola Adedayo, Muneeb Ahmed, Sai Anusha Akella, Hiram Muriuki, Samuel Sule-Saa, Muhanned Faisal Towfig
article en

Abstract

Background: Pulmonary Embolism (PE) is a potentially life-threatening condition that warrants careful consideration of its risk factors and associated comorbidities. Viral pneumonia (VP) has been increasingly recognized as a significant risk factor for PE. The interplay between severe viral infection and coagulation abnormalities can lead to a higher incidence of thrombotic complications, multi-organ failure, and increased mortality among hospitalized patients. Objective: To evaluate the impact of concomitant VP on outcomes in patients admitted with PE in the United States between the years 2016 - 2021. Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed data from 1,120,609.4 patients hospitalized with PE without VP and 6,370.0 patients with concurrent VP. Multivariable logistic and linear regression models were utilized, adjusting for factors including age, gender, race, Charlson Comorbidity Index score, median household income, hospital region, and teaching status. The analysis focused on outcomes such as in-hospital mortality, hospital charges, complications, and length of stay. Results: Patients hospitalized with PE and concurrent VP had significantly higher odds of in-hospital mortality compared to those without VP (Adjusted OR: 2.37; 95% CI: 1.88–2.99; P < .01). Hospital charges were also higher in the VP group—by $22,443.66 unadjusted (95% CI: $15,826.40–$29,060.91; P < .01) and $23,881.98 after OR adjustment (95% CI: $17,191.99–$30,571.98; P < .01). This may be related to a longer average hospital stay, which was 1.81 days greater in the VP group (AOR: 1.81; 95% CI: 1.46–2.17; P < .01), though not clinically significant. Complications were more common in PE patients with VP, including acute cor pulmonale (AOR: 1.62; 95% CI: 1.51–1.74; P < .01), cardiac arrest (AOR: 1.67; 95% CI: 1.19–2.34; P < .01), and hypoxic respiratory failure (AOR: 3.35; 95% CI: 2.98–3.76; P < .01). No significant differences were observed in the odds of ventricular arrhythmia, right heart failure, or cardiogenic shock between the two groups. Conclusion: Patients hospitalized with PE and VP face higher risks of death, longer hospital stays, more complications, and increased healthcare costs. These findings underscore the importance of early recognition and preventive measures—like flu vaccination—to reduce the impact of viral infections on thrombotic events.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Interfaith Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.