Abstract 4371507: Intersecting Maternity and Cardiology Care Deserts: Assessing the Impact on Maternal Hypertensive Outcomes in the U.S.

Background: Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) are a major contributor to maternal mortality in the U.S. While the role of maternity care deserts regions lacking adequate obstetric services is increasingly recognized, the impact of overlapping gaps in both obstetric and cardiology access remains underexplored. As cardiovascular complications account for a growing proportion of maternal deaths, dual-system access may represent a critical equity issue. Aims: To evaluate the impact of maternity and cardiology care access on maternal hypertensive outcomes; identify “double desert” states with dual deficits; assess their association with MMR, incidence, and DALYs; and propose a “Double Desert Index” to guide policy and interventions. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that U.S. states with both high maternity care desert burden and low cardiologist density would demonstrate significantly worse maternal hypertensive outcomes, including higher mortality and DALYs, than states with adequate dual access. Methods: We extracted 2021 state-level data on maternal mortality ratio (MMR), HDP incidence, and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) from the Global Burden of Disease database. These were merged with 2024 March of Dimes estimates on the percentage of counties per state classified as maternity care deserts (%MCD). Cardiologist density (per 100,000 population) was sourced from AAMC 2021 reports. States were categorized as: (1) single deserts (high %MCD or low cardiologist density), (2) double deserts (high on both), and (3) low-burden (adequate access). Correlation analyses were conducted. Results: Double desert states (e.g., Mississippi, Arkansas, Alabama) exhibited the highest MMRs (≥3.5 per 100,000 live births) and DALYs (>19.0 per 100,000) compared to low-burden states like Massachusetts and Vermont. A positive correlation was observed between %MCD and DALYs (r = 0.65), and an inverse correlation between cardiologist density and MMR (r = –0.58). Double desert states showed up to 1.7× higher maternal mortality than the national median. Conclusions: Intersecting gaps in maternity and cardiology access substantially increase maternal hypertensive burden in the U.S. We propose a federally recognized “Double Desert Index” to identify and monitor dual-access deficit regions. This metric could guide equitable health resource distribution, cardio-obstetric service expansion, and maternal cardiovascular risk reduction nationwide.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4371507
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4371507: Intersecting Maternity and Cardiology Care Deserts: Assessing the Impact on Maternal Hypertensive Outcomes in the U.S.

Pranay Marlecha, Sweta Sahu, Aishwar Dixit
Circulation
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
article

Abstract 4371507: Intersecting Maternity and Cardiology Care Deserts: Assessing the Impact on Maternal Hypertensive Outcomes in the U.S.

Pranay Marlecha, Sweta Sahu, Aishwar Dixit
article en

Abstract

Background: Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) are a major contributor to maternal mortality in the U.S. While the role of maternity care deserts regions lacking adequate obstetric services is increasingly recognized, the impact of overlapping gaps in both obstetric and cardiology access remains underexplored. As cardiovascular complications account for a growing proportion of maternal deaths, dual-system access may represent a critical equity issue. Aims: To evaluate the impact of maternity and cardiology care access on maternal hypertensive outcomes; identify “double desert” states with dual deficits; assess their association with MMR, incidence, and DALYs; and propose a “Double Desert Index” to guide policy and interventions. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that U.S. states with both high maternity care desert burden and low cardiologist density would demonstrate significantly worse maternal hypertensive outcomes, including higher mortality and DALYs, than states with adequate dual access. Methods: We extracted 2021 state-level data on maternal mortality ratio (MMR), HDP incidence, and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) from the Global Burden of Disease database. These were merged with 2024 March of Dimes estimates on the percentage of counties per state classified as maternity care deserts (%MCD). Cardiologist density (per 100,000 population) was sourced from AAMC 2021 reports. States were categorized as: (1) single deserts (high %MCD or low cardiologist density), (2) double deserts (high on both), and (3) low-burden (adequate access). Correlation analyses were conducted. Results: Double desert states (e.g., Mississippi, Arkansas, Alabama) exhibited the highest MMRs (≥3.5 per 100,000 live births) and DALYs (>19.0 per 100,000) compared to low-burden states like Massachusetts and Vermont. A positive correlation was observed between %MCD and DALYs (r = 0.65), and an inverse correlation between cardiologist density and MMR (r = –0.58). Double desert states showed up to 1.7× higher maternal mortality than the national median. Conclusions: Intersecting gaps in maternity and cardiology access substantially increase maternal hypertensive burden in the U.S. We propose a federally recognized “Double Desert Index” to identify and monitor dual-access deficit regions. This metric could guide equitable health resource distribution, cardio-obstetric service expansion, and maternal cardiovascular risk reduction nationwide.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Kempegowda Institute of Medical Sciences (IN), Sarojini Naidu Medical College (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.