Abstract 4372843: Cognitive Impairment in Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prevalence and Predictors

Background: Cognitive impairment (CI) is increasingly recognized as a critical comorbidity in patients with heart failure (HF), contributing to medication nonadherence, readmissions, and mortality. However, its true prevalence and determinants remain unclear. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to quantify the prevalence of CI in HF and identify key clinical predictors. Methods: We followed PRISMA guidelines and searched PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Cochrane databases through April 2024 using terms: (“cognitive dysfunction” OR “cognitive impairment”) AND (“heart failure” OR “cardiac dysfunction”). Studies were included if they: (1) enrolled adult HF patients; (2) assessed CI using validated tools (e.g., MoCA, MMSE); and (3) reported prevalence or correlations with clinical variables. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Pooled prevalence estimates and odds ratios (ORs) were calculated using a random-effects model (DerSimonian–Laird method). Results: Of 1,147 screened articles, 26 met inclusion criteria (n=6,328 HF patients; mean age 69±9 years). The pooled prevalence of CI in HF was 42% (95% CI: 36–48%, I = 72%). Subgroup analysis revealed higher prevalence in HF with reduced EF (HFrEF) (48%) compared to preserved EF (HFpEF) (35%, p<0.01). Severe LV dysfunction (LVEF <30%) was associated with increased risk of CI (OR 1.92; 95% CI: 1.43–2.59), as were elevated NT-proBNP (OR 1.71) and age >75 (OR 2.14). Cognitive domains most affected included executive function and visuospatial processing. Funnel plot asymmetry was minimal (Egger’s p = 0.11). Conclusion: CI affects over 40% of HF patients, with greater burden in HFrEF and elderly subgroups. Clinical predictors such as reduced LVEF, age, and NT-proBNP may aid early identification. These findings highlight the need for routine cognitive screening and integration of cognitive assessment into HF care models to improve adherence and outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4372843
Primary Topic
Heart Failure Treatment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4372843: Cognitive Impairment in Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prevalence and Predictors

SAI TAPASVI MADAM, Varsha Miriyala, Karthik Chintharala, Hadassa Evangeline Sekharamahanti
Circulation
Heart Failure Treatment and Management
article

Abstract 4372843: Cognitive Impairment in Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prevalence and Predictors

SAI TAPASVI MADAM, Varsha Miriyala, Karthik Chintharala, Hadassa Evangeline Sekharamahanti
article en

Abstract

Background: Cognitive impairment (CI) is increasingly recognized as a critical comorbidity in patients with heart failure (HF), contributing to medication nonadherence, readmissions, and mortality. However, its true prevalence and determinants remain unclear. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to quantify the prevalence of CI in HF and identify key clinical predictors. Methods: We followed PRISMA guidelines and searched PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Cochrane databases through April 2024 using terms: (“cognitive dysfunction” OR “cognitive impairment”) AND (“heart failure” OR “cardiac dysfunction”). Studies were included if they: (1) enrolled adult HF patients; (2) assessed CI using validated tools (e.g., MoCA, MMSE); and (3) reported prevalence or correlations with clinical variables. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Pooled prevalence estimates and odds ratios (ORs) were calculated using a random-effects model (DerSimonian–Laird method). Results: Of 1,147 screened articles, 26 met inclusion criteria (n=6,328 HF patients; mean age 69±9 years). The pooled prevalence of CI in HF was 42% (95% CI: 36–48%, I = 72%). Subgroup analysis revealed higher prevalence in HF with reduced EF (HFrEF) (48%) compared to preserved EF (HFpEF) (35%, p<0.01). Severe LV dysfunction (LVEF <30%) was associated with increased risk of CI (OR 1.92; 95% CI: 1.43–2.59), as were elevated NT-proBNP (OR 1.71) and age >75 (OR 2.14). Cognitive domains most affected included executive function and visuospatial processing. Funnel plot asymmetry was minimal (Egger’s p = 0.11). Conclusion: CI affects over 40% of HF patients, with greater burden in HFrEF and elderly subgroups. Clinical predictors such as reduced LVEF, age, and NT-proBNP may aid early identification. These findings highlight the need for routine cognitive screening and integration of cognitive assessment into HF care models to improve adherence and outcomes.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Catholic Medical Center (US), University of Miami (US), GSL Medical College & General Hospital (IN), Dr. NTR University of Health Sciences (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Heart Failure Treatment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.