Abstract 4358099: Cardiology Conferences Have a Higher Research Yield Than Other Subspecialties: A 10-Year Follow-Up Study of AHA and ACC Annual Meetings

Introduction: Leading cardiology conferences like the American Heart Association (AHA) and American College of Cardiology (ACC) Annual Meetings are vital platforms for presenting novel research, fostering collaboration, and providing early insights into studies that may progress to full publication. Abstract-to-publication conversion serves as a key metric of scientific impact. This study evaluates the publication rate of abstracts presented at the AHA and ACC annual meetings in 2015 and 2018, examines factors associated with successful publication, and compares these rates with those of other internal medicine specialties. Methods: Abstracts were retrieved from online supplements of the Circulation journal and the Journal of the ACC . Data extracted included year, presentation type, author count, study type, and institutional affiliations. A 7–10-year follow-up was performed to identify corresponding full-length publications using PubMed and Google Scholar, requiring a match with three keywords and one author’s name. Chi-square and t-tests were used for statistical analysis. A 25% publication rate was hypothesized. Results: Of 11,802 abstracts (AHA: 6,965; ACC: 4,837), 54.7% were published, more than double the hypothesized rate. AHA had a slightly higher rate (55.3%) than ACC (53.8%; p = 0.10). Oral presentations were four times more likely to be published than posters. Multi-institutional studies and abstracts with >6 authors had significantly higher publication rates (p < 0.001). The mean impact factor (IF) of destination journals was 7.47, with JAHA being the most common destination journal (4.4%). Compared to internal medicine and other subspecialty conferences, Cardiology, specifically AHA, demonstrated higher publication rates and journal IFs. Conclusion: Cardiology meetings have a robust research yield, with publication rates exceeding historical norms and high-impact journal placements. The AHA, in particular, consistently facilitates the dissemination of high-quality, peer-reviewed research, underscoring its continued importance in the cardiovascular academic landscape.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4358099
Primary Topic
Academic Publishing and Open Access
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4358099: Cardiology Conferences Have a Higher Research Yield Than Other Subspecialties: A 10-Year Follow-Up Study of AHA and ACC Annual Meetings

Bhavi Desai, Aayushi J. Rajani, Juhi Amin, Chinmay Patel et al.
Circulation
Academic Publishing and Open Access
article

Abstract 4358099: Cardiology Conferences Have a Higher Research Yield Than Other Subspecialties: A 10-Year Follow-Up Study of AHA and ACC Annual Meetings

Bhavi Desai, Aayushi J. Rajani, Juhi Amin, Chinmay Patel, Dipan J. Shah, Deepen S. Gandhi, Kajal Shah, Nilesh Shah, Shifa Karatela, Shreya Mittal, Abhishek Soni, Purav Shah, R. N. Vaishnav, Hitanshi Bhuptani
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Leading cardiology conferences like the American Heart Association (AHA) and American College of Cardiology (ACC) Annual Meetings are vital platforms for presenting novel research, fostering collaboration, and providing early insights into studies that may progress to full publication. Abstract-to-publication conversion serves as a key metric of scientific impact. This study evaluates the publication rate of abstracts presented at the AHA and ACC annual meetings in 2015 and 2018, examines factors associated with successful publication, and compares these rates with those of other internal medicine specialties. Methods: Abstracts were retrieved from online supplements of the Circulation journal and the Journal of the ACC . Data extracted included year, presentation type, author count, study type, and institutional affiliations. A 7–10-year follow-up was performed to identify corresponding full-length publications using PubMed and Google Scholar, requiring a match with three keywords and one author’s name. Chi-square and t-tests were used for statistical analysis. A 25% publication rate was hypothesized. Results: Of 11,802 abstracts (AHA: 6,965; ACC: 4,837), 54.7% were published, more than double the hypothesized rate. AHA had a slightly higher rate (55.3%) than ACC (53.8%; p = 0.10). Oral presentations were four times more likely to be published than posters. Multi-institutional studies and abstracts with >6 authors had significantly higher publication rates (p < 0.001). The mean impact factor (IF) of destination journals was 7.47, with JAHA being the most common destination journal (4.4%). Compared to internal medicine and other subspecialty conferences, Cardiology, specifically AHA, demonstrated higher publication rates and journal IFs. Conclusion: Cardiology meetings have a robust research yield, with publication rates exceeding historical norms and high-impact journal placements. The AHA, in particular, consistently facilitates the dissemination of high-quality, peer-reviewed research, underscoring its continued importance in the cardiovascular academic landscape.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Sir Sayajirao General Hospital Medical College (IN), Lokmanya Tilak Municipal General Hospital and Lokmanya Tilak Municipal Medical College (IN), University of Missouri Health System (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Academic Publishing and Open Access
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.