Abstract 4362656: Antithrombotic Strategies and Outcomes in Neonates and Infants with Cardiac Shunts: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background: Cardiac shunt thrombosis in neonates and infants remains a concern for shunt failure and mortality. Thromboprophylaxis for the prevention of shunt thrombosis is not an accepted standard due to a lack of high-level evidence. Despite the use of various antiplatelet and anticoagulant agents, thrombosis remains a common complication. In addition, limited evidence on the ideal antithrombotic approach for cardiac shunts, and there is variation in the agent selection and dosing utilized. Ultimately, the optimal strategy for thromboprophylaxis remains unknown. Objective: This systematic review aims to characterize antithrombotic strategies and outcomes in neonates and infants with a cardiac shunt. Methods: MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane’s CENTRAL were searched from inception through July 2024 for studies reporting shunt thrombosis prevalence among infants who received a cardiac shunt. We estimated the pooled prevalence of shunt thrombosis using random-effects meta-analysis. In the subgroup analysis, we evaluated the effects of shunt type and antithrombotic strategies on shunt thrombosis prevalence. Results: A total of 39 studies (29 retrospective, 10 prospective) were included, totaling 4735 patients. The most common shunt type was the modified Blalock-Taussig (mBTTS) (n=2224, 47%). Mortality related to shunt thrombosis occurred in 102 (26.2%) of patients with shunt thrombosis. The most common antithrombotic agents in the acute post-op setting were unfractionated heparin (UFH, n=1452, 30.7%) or aspirin (n=1413, 29.3%). The pooled prevalence of shunt thrombosis was 8.4% (95% Confidence Interval [CI], 6.5%-10.4%) and varied among antithrombotic agents: aspirin: 7.4% (95% CI, 4.0%-11.4%), UFH: 3.8% (95% CI, 0%-12.3%), or UFH followed by aspirin: 6.3% (95% CI, 3.6%-9.4%). Conclusions: This systematic review of nearly 5,000 neonates and infants reveals a high rate of mortality associated with shunt thrombosis. Collaborative prospective studies are warranted to evaluate antithrombotic regimen-outcome relationships and prognostic factors for shunt thrombosis and bleeding outcomes in these children.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4362656
Primary Topic
Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4362656: Antithrombotic Strategies and Outcomes in Neonates and Infants with Cardiac Shunts: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Neil M. Goldenberg, Joshua W. Branstetter, Amy L. Kiskaddon, Therese M. Giglia et al.
Circulation
Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
article

Abstract 4362656: Antithrombotic Strategies and Outcomes in Neonates and Infants with Cardiac Shunts: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Neil M. Goldenberg, Joshua W. Branstetter, Amy L. Kiskaddon, Therese M. Giglia, Nhue Do, Marisol Betensky, Dina Ashour, Pamela Williams, Michael Silvey, Arabela Stock
article en

Abstract

Background: Cardiac shunt thrombosis in neonates and infants remains a concern for shunt failure and mortality. Thromboprophylaxis for the prevention of shunt thrombosis is not an accepted standard due to a lack of high-level evidence. Despite the use of various antiplatelet and anticoagulant agents, thrombosis remains a common complication. In addition, limited evidence on the ideal antithrombotic approach for cardiac shunts, and there is variation in the agent selection and dosing utilized. Ultimately, the optimal strategy for thromboprophylaxis remains unknown. Objective: This systematic review aims to characterize antithrombotic strategies and outcomes in neonates and infants with a cardiac shunt. Methods: MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane’s CENTRAL were searched from inception through July 2024 for studies reporting shunt thrombosis prevalence among infants who received a cardiac shunt. We estimated the pooled prevalence of shunt thrombosis using random-effects meta-analysis. In the subgroup analysis, we evaluated the effects of shunt type and antithrombotic strategies on shunt thrombosis prevalence. Results: A total of 39 studies (29 retrospective, 10 prospective) were included, totaling 4735 patients. The most common shunt type was the modified Blalock-Taussig (mBTTS) (n=2224, 47%). Mortality related to shunt thrombosis occurred in 102 (26.2%) of patients with shunt thrombosis. The most common antithrombotic agents in the acute post-op setting were unfractionated heparin (UFH, n=1452, 30.7%) or aspirin (n=1413, 29.3%). The pooled prevalence of shunt thrombosis was 8.4% (95% Confidence Interval [CI], 6.5%-10.4%) and varied among antithrombotic agents: aspirin: 7.4% (95% CI, 4.0%-11.4%), UFH: 3.8% (95% CI, 0%-12.3%), or UFH followed by aspirin: 6.3% (95% CI, 3.6%-9.4%). Conclusions: This systematic review of nearly 5,000 neonates and infants reveals a high rate of mortality associated with shunt thrombosis. Collaborative prospective studies are warranted to evaluate antithrombotic regimen-outcome relationships and prognostic factors for shunt thrombosis and bleeding outcomes in these children.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Children's Mercy Hospital (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), HR Wallingford (GB), Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital (US), Mercy Hospital (US), Wallingford Public Library (US), Atlanta Gastroenterology Associates (US), Advocate Heart Institute (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.