Abstract 4355469: AI-driven Aortic Valve Calcification Measurement in Coronary Artery Calcium Scan Detects Aortic Stenosis Comparably to Human Experts: An AI-CVD Study within the Framingham Heart Study

Background: Aortic valve calcification (AVC) is an early marker of aortic stenosis but is not routinely scored and reported in coronary artery calium (CAC) scans. Traditional manual quantification methods are time-consuming and subject to inter-reader variability, limiting their scalability in clinical practice. The AI-CVD initiative (see figure 1) aims to extract all useful opportunistic screening information from CAC scans to maximize prediction of cardiovascular diseases (CVD). Hypothesis: We hypothesized that the AI-CVD measurements of AVC in CAC scans performs comparably to manual measurements by human experts. Methods: We analyzed 742 CAC scans from the Framingham Heart Study Offspring cohort, acquired between 2002 and 2005 who also had an echocardiogram with aortic valve analysis. The AI model was trained to segment each aortic valve leaflet and quantify calcification using the Agatston criteria (>130HU and ≥1mm2). Manual AVC scores were previously computed by trained huamn experts. The primary outcome was clinically diagnosed aortic stenosis, identified cross-sectionally from health records. We compared the performance of AI-CVD and manual AVC scores using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) analysis and confusion matrix metrics, including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and F1 score. Results: Among 742 participants, 22 had a clinical diagnosis of aortic stenosis. 18 cases of aortic stenosis were correctly identified by AI-measured AVC compared to 15 cases by manual measurements. The AUC for aortic stenosis diagnosis for AI-CVD AVC was 0.934 vs. 0.883 for huamn experts. Confusion matrices and ROC curves support the improved accuracy and lower false negative rate of AI-based measurement versus human experts. Conclusion: AI-CVD AVC score detects aortic stenosis comparably to manual measurements by huamn experts in the Framingham Heart Study Offspring Cohort. These findings support the integration of AI-enabled opportunistic screening into CAC scans to maximize CVD prediction beyond the CAC score.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4355469
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4355469: AI-driven Aortic Valve Calcification Measurement in Coronary Artery Calcium Scan Detects Aortic Stenosis Comparably to Human Experts: An AI-CVD Study within the Framingham Heart Study

Claudia I. Henschke, David F. Yankelevitz, Anthony P. Reeves, Jakob Wasserthal et al.
Circulation
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
article

Abstract 4355469: AI-driven Aortic Valve Calcification Measurement in Coronary Artery Calcium Scan Detects Aortic Stenosis Comparably to Human Experts: An AI-CVD Study within the Framingham Heart Study

Claudia I. Henschke, David F. Yankelevitz, Anthony P. Reeves, Jakob Wasserthal, Nathan D. Wong, Thomas Atlas, Kyle Atlas, Chenyu Zhang, Morteza Naghavi
article en

Abstract

Background: Aortic valve calcification (AVC) is an early marker of aortic stenosis but is not routinely scored and reported in coronary artery calium (CAC) scans. Traditional manual quantification methods are time-consuming and subject to inter-reader variability, limiting their scalability in clinical practice. The AI-CVD initiative (see figure 1) aims to extract all useful opportunistic screening information from CAC scans to maximize prediction of cardiovascular diseases (CVD). Hypothesis: We hypothesized that the AI-CVD measurements of AVC in CAC scans performs comparably to manual measurements by human experts. Methods: We analyzed 742 CAC scans from the Framingham Heart Study Offspring cohort, acquired between 2002 and 2005 who also had an echocardiogram with aortic valve analysis. The AI model was trained to segment each aortic valve leaflet and quantify calcification using the Agatston criteria (>130HU and ≥1mm2). Manual AVC scores were previously computed by trained huamn experts. The primary outcome was clinically diagnosed aortic stenosis, identified cross-sectionally from health records. We compared the performance of AI-CVD and manual AVC scores using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) analysis and confusion matrix metrics, including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and F1 score. Results: Among 742 participants, 22 had a clinical diagnosis of aortic stenosis. 18 cases of aortic stenosis were correctly identified by AI-measured AVC compared to 15 cases by manual measurements. The AUC for aortic stenosis diagnosis for AI-CVD AVC was 0.934 vs. 0.883 for huamn experts. Confusion matrices and ROC curves support the improved accuracy and lower false negative rate of AI-based measurement versus human experts. Conclusion: AI-CVD AVC score detects aortic stenosis comparably to manual measurements by huamn experts in the Framingham Heart Study Offspring Cohort. These findings support the integration of AI-enabled opportunistic screening into CAC scans to maximize CVD prediction beyond the CAC score.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
University of California, Irvine (US), Cornell University (US), Mount Sinai Hospital (US), Heart Imaging Technologies (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.