Abstract 4348304: Unsupervised Machine Learning Identifies Distinct Clinical Phenotypes in Acute Heart Failure Hospitalizations: A Nationwide Study Using the National Inpatient Sample

Background: Heart failure has traditionally been classified as systolic vs diastolic, however acute heart failure (AHF) hospitalizations, often has various outcomes seen in bedside clinical medicine, driven by comorbidities, hemodynamic states, and initial presentation. Research: Question Can unsupervised machine learning (ML) identify distinct clinical phenotypes among adults hospitalized with acute heart failure and guide management strategies? Methods: We analyzed non-elective adult hospitalizations with AHF from the 2022 National Inpatient Sample (NIS). Five machine learning models were employed for prediction: Logistic Regression, Naive Bayes, Random Forest, XGBoost, and an artificial neural network (ANN) model. Unsupervised clustering was performed using K-means after principal component analysis (PCA) (k=4, Fig 1). Cluster visualization was enhanced via t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (t-SNE) and Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection (UMAP) on a 10,000-patient subsample (Fig 2). Clusters were profiled by demographic and clinical characteristics.All analysis was conducted using Python 3.11. Results: Four distinct patient clusters were identified amongst heart failure admissions. Cluster 0 (47.1%) comprised younger healthier patients (mean age 28.8 years) and lowest in-hospital mortality (1%) representing AHF cases with non-chronic triggers. Cluster 1(2.9%) consisted of older individuals, with coronary artery disease and interventions, such as CABG, PCI (mean age 74.1 years) and moderate mortality (3%) confirming an ischemic heart disease phenotype . Cluster 2 (35.3%) exhibited a cardiopulmonary/ metabolic profile with moderate mortality (3%, mean age 66.1 years) indicating a common heart failure phenotype with systemic involvement . Cluster 3 (14.6%) was dominated by arrhythmia and older population (mean age 74.5 years) and had the highest in-hospital mortality(6%) suggesting a high-risk arrhythmia-dominant phenotype (p <0.001 for all).(Image 3) Conclusions: Unsupervised machine learning identified four unique and clinically relevant phenotypes among adults hospitalized with AHF, differentiated by comorbidity burden and in-hospital mortality. Our study highlights the potential of ML driven phenotyping to inform risk stratification, and clinical decisions in acute heart failure management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4348304
Primary Topic
Machine Learning in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4348304: Unsupervised Machine Learning Identifies Distinct Clinical Phenotypes in Acute Heart Failure Hospitalizations: A Nationwide Study Using the National Inpatient Sample

Jared Green, Aniruddha Pratap Singh, Arjun Basnet, Aobo Li et al.
Circulation
Machine Learning in Healthcare
article

Abstract 4348304: Unsupervised Machine Learning Identifies Distinct Clinical Phenotypes in Acute Heart Failure Hospitalizations: A Nationwide Study Using the National Inpatient Sample

Jared Green, Aniruddha Pratap Singh, Arjun Basnet, Aobo Li, James Fagan, Avilash Mondal, Julian Diaz Fraga, Devendra Tripathi, GIORGI CHILINGARASHVILI, Nandini Razdan
article en

Abstract

Background: Heart failure has traditionally been classified as systolic vs diastolic, however acute heart failure (AHF) hospitalizations, often has various outcomes seen in bedside clinical medicine, driven by comorbidities, hemodynamic states, and initial presentation. Research: Question Can unsupervised machine learning (ML) identify distinct clinical phenotypes among adults hospitalized with acute heart failure and guide management strategies? Methods: We analyzed non-elective adult hospitalizations with AHF from the 2022 National Inpatient Sample (NIS). Five machine learning models were employed for prediction: Logistic Regression, Naive Bayes, Random Forest, XGBoost, and an artificial neural network (ANN) model. Unsupervised clustering was performed using K-means after principal component analysis (PCA) (k=4, Fig 1). Cluster visualization was enhanced via t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (t-SNE) and Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection (UMAP) on a 10,000-patient subsample (Fig 2). Clusters were profiled by demographic and clinical characteristics.All analysis was conducted using Python 3.11. Results: Four distinct patient clusters were identified amongst heart failure admissions. Cluster 0 (47.1%) comprised younger healthier patients (mean age 28.8 years) and lowest in-hospital mortality (1%) representing AHF cases with non-chronic triggers. Cluster 1(2.9%) consisted of older individuals, with coronary artery disease and interventions, such as CABG, PCI (mean age 74.1 years) and moderate mortality (3%) confirming an ischemic heart disease phenotype . Cluster 2 (35.3%) exhibited a cardiopulmonary/ metabolic profile with moderate mortality (3%, mean age 66.1 years) indicating a common heart failure phenotype with systemic involvement . Cluster 3 (14.6%) was dominated by arrhythmia and older population (mean age 74.5 years) and had the highest in-hospital mortality(6%) suggesting a high-risk arrhythmia-dominant phenotype (p <0.001 for all).(Image 3) Conclusions: Unsupervised machine learning identified four unique and clinically relevant phenotypes among adults hospitalized with AHF, differentiated by comorbidity burden and in-hospital mortality. Our study highlights the potential of ML driven phenotyping to inform risk stratification, and clinical decisions in acute heart failure management.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine (US), West Virginia University (US), Reading Hospital (US), Inspira Medical Center Vineland (US), Nazareth Hospital (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Machine Learning in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.