Abstract 4371560: Obicetrapib in Patients with Dyslipidemia with or without Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Background: Guideline-directed lipid-lowering still leaves up to one-third of high-risk patients above LDL-C targets, sustaining residual cardiovascular risk. Obicetrapib—an oral cholesteryl-ester transfer-protein inhibitor has produced promising results in LDL-C reductions in recent phase 2/3 trials. We aim to quantify the efficacy and safety of Obicetrapib versus placebo in statin-treated adults. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Scopus, and Web of Science (inception to 15 May 2025) for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that enrolled adults with dyslipidemia (with or without atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk (ASCVD) receiving statins and compared Obicetrapib (1, 2.5, 5, or 10 mg) against placebo. Dichotomous outcomes were pooled as risk ratios (RRs), and continuous outcomes as mean differences (MDs), each with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs). Results: A total of 3,386 patients were included across six RCTs. Obicetrapib, compared to placebo, was associated with a significantly greater reduction in LDL-C (MD: -27.29 mg/dL; 95% CI: -33.65 to -20.93; P < 0.0001) and a significantly greater increase in HDL-C (MD: 70.96 mg/dL; 95% CI: 64.71 to 77.20; P < 0.0001). Obicetrapib also significantly increased the likelihood of achieving LDL-C targets of <55 mg/dL (RR: 6.42; 95% CI: 5.15 to 8.01; P < 0.0001), <70 mg/dL (RR: 2.56; P < 0.0001), and <100 mg/dL (RR: 1.34; P < 0.0001). Additionally, apolipoprotein B levels were significantly reduced with Obicetrapib (MD: -14.34 mg/dL; 95% CI: -19.28 to -9.41; P < 0.0001). Additionally, there was no significant difference in total adverse events (AEs) (P= 0.4124), serious AEs (P= 0.3712), and AEs leading to discontinuation of medication (P=0.4035). Conclusion: Our analysis shows that Obicetrapib, a selective CETP inhibitor, significantly improves lipid profiles in statin-treated patients with dyslipidemia, with or without ASCVD. It led to marked reductions in LDL-C, non-HDL-C, and apoB, and substantial increases in HDL-C. These effects significantly increased the achievement of LDL-C targets. Obicetrapib’s safety profile was similar to that of the placebo. Further RCTs are needed to confirm these findings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4371560
Primary Topic
Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4371560: Obicetrapib in Patients with Dyslipidemia with or without Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Abdalhakim R. M. Shubietah, Ahmed K. Emara, Ahmed Farid Gadelmawla, Michael S. Megaly et al.
Circulation
Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
article

Abstract 4371560: Obicetrapib in Patients with Dyslipidemia with or without Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Abdalhakim R. M. Shubietah, Ahmed K. Emara, Ahmed Farid Gadelmawla, Michael S. Megaly, Mohamed Emara, Mohamed S. Elgendy, Ahmed Diaa, Mohamed Rifai, Mohamed A. Elshewikh
article en

Abstract

Background: Guideline-directed lipid-lowering still leaves up to one-third of high-risk patients above LDL-C targets, sustaining residual cardiovascular risk. Obicetrapib—an oral cholesteryl-ester transfer-protein inhibitor has produced promising results in LDL-C reductions in recent phase 2/3 trials. We aim to quantify the efficacy and safety of Obicetrapib versus placebo in statin-treated adults. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Scopus, and Web of Science (inception to 15 May 2025) for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that enrolled adults with dyslipidemia (with or without atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk (ASCVD) receiving statins and compared Obicetrapib (1, 2.5, 5, or 10 mg) against placebo. Dichotomous outcomes were pooled as risk ratios (RRs), and continuous outcomes as mean differences (MDs), each with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs). Results: A total of 3,386 patients were included across six RCTs. Obicetrapib, compared to placebo, was associated with a significantly greater reduction in LDL-C (MD: -27.29 mg/dL; 95% CI: -33.65 to -20.93; P < 0.0001) and a significantly greater increase in HDL-C (MD: 70.96 mg/dL; 95% CI: 64.71 to 77.20; P < 0.0001). Obicetrapib also significantly increased the likelihood of achieving LDL-C targets of <55 mg/dL (RR: 6.42; 95% CI: 5.15 to 8.01; P < 0.0001), <70 mg/dL (RR: 2.56; P < 0.0001), and <100 mg/dL (RR: 1.34; P < 0.0001). Additionally, apolipoprotein B levels were significantly reduced with Obicetrapib (MD: -14.34 mg/dL; 95% CI: -19.28 to -9.41; P < 0.0001). Additionally, there was no significant difference in total adverse events (AEs) (P= 0.4124), serious AEs (P= 0.3712), and AEs leading to discontinuation of medication (P=0.4035). Conclusion: Our analysis shows that Obicetrapib, a selective CETP inhibitor, significantly improves lipid profiles in statin-treated patients with dyslipidemia, with or without ASCVD. It led to marked reductions in LDL-C, non-HDL-C, and apoB, and substantial increases in HDL-C. These effects significantly increased the achievement of LDL-C targets. Obicetrapib’s safety profile was similar to that of the placebo. Further RCTs are needed to confirm these findings.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Ascension (US), Al-Azhar University (EG), Tanta University (EG), St. John Medical Center (US), Oklahoma Heart Institute (US), Advocate Illinois Masonic Medical Center (US), Menoufia University (EG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.