Abstract 4368767: Persistent Statin Underutilization in Cancer Survivors for Primary Prevention NHANES (2013-2020)

Background: Cancer survivors are at an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) due to shared risk factors and the cardiotoxicity of cancer therapies. While statins are widely recommended for primary prevention, their real-world utilization and adherence in this population remain inadequately characterized. Understanding gaps in implementation is crucial for optimizing cardiovascular care in this population. Hypothesis: We assessed trends over time in the use of guideline-recommended statin therapy among statin eligible cancer survivors and evaluated the impact of the 2013 AHA/ACC cholesterol treatment guidelines. Method: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) from 2013 to March, 2020. From 35,706 participants, we identified 11,974 individuals aged 40 to 75 years. Statin eligibility was determined based on established criteria, including an Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease (ASCVD) risk score of ≥7.5%, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels of ≥190 mg/dL, or a diagnosis of diabetes. This yielded a cohort of 2,008 statin-eligible individuals. The final analytic sample comprised 1,498 participants with seld reported cancer diagnosis, medication use, including antihypertensive therapy and statin therapy (a derived variable for statin use based on prescription medication data). Results: Among individuals with a history of cancer (n=202), 93.6% met the criteria for statin therapy. However, only 45.0% were receiving treatment (p=0.012). In the overall statin-eligible cohort (n=1,316), statin prescription rates were even lower, with only 39.0% undergoing therapy (p< 0.0001). Statin utilization among eligible cancer patients exhibited minimal progress across successive NHANES cycles (47.6% in 2013–14, 43.8% in 2015–16, and 47.8% in 2017–20), highlighting a persistent gap in adherence to clinical guidelines. Conclusion: Despite their increased cardiovascular risk, cancer survivors exhibit significant underutilization of statins for primary prevention, with no significant improvement following guideline updates. This persistent treatment gap underscores the need for better integration of preventive cardiovascular care within oncology practice. Future efforts should prioritize the development of cardio-oncology-specific implementation strategies, targeted provider education, and multidisciplinary collaboration to optimize preventive cardiovascular care in cancer survivors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4368767
Primary Topic
Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4368767: Persistent Statin Underutilization in Cancer Survivors for Primary Prevention NHANES (2013-2020)

Harshkumar Patel, Harshith Thyagaturu, Sittinun Thangjui, Brijesh Patel et al.
Circulation
Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism
article

Abstract 4368767: Persistent Statin Underutilization in Cancer Survivors for Primary Prevention NHANES (2013-2020)

Harshkumar Patel, Harshith Thyagaturu, Sittinun Thangjui, Brijesh Patel, Shuddhi Ravani
article en

Abstract

Background: Cancer survivors are at an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) due to shared risk factors and the cardiotoxicity of cancer therapies. While statins are widely recommended for primary prevention, their real-world utilization and adherence in this population remain inadequately characterized. Understanding gaps in implementation is crucial for optimizing cardiovascular care in this population. Hypothesis: We assessed trends over time in the use of guideline-recommended statin therapy among statin eligible cancer survivors and evaluated the impact of the 2013 AHA/ACC cholesterol treatment guidelines. Method: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) from 2013 to March, 2020. From 35,706 participants, we identified 11,974 individuals aged 40 to 75 years. Statin eligibility was determined based on established criteria, including an Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease (ASCVD) risk score of ≥7.5%, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels of ≥190 mg/dL, or a diagnosis of diabetes. This yielded a cohort of 2,008 statin-eligible individuals. The final analytic sample comprised 1,498 participants with seld reported cancer diagnosis, medication use, including antihypertensive therapy and statin therapy (a derived variable for statin use based on prescription medication data). Results: Among individuals with a history of cancer (n=202), 93.6% met the criteria for statin therapy. However, only 45.0% were receiving treatment (p=0.012). In the overall statin-eligible cohort (n=1,316), statin prescription rates were even lower, with only 39.0% undergoing therapy (p< 0.0001). Statin utilization among eligible cancer patients exhibited minimal progress across successive NHANES cycles (47.6% in 2013–14, 43.8% in 2015–16, and 47.8% in 2017–20), highlighting a persistent gap in adherence to clinical guidelines. Conclusion: Despite their increased cardiovascular risk, cancer survivors exhibit significant underutilization of statins for primary prevention, with no significant improvement following guideline updates. This persistent treatment gap underscores the need for better integration of preventive cardiovascular care within oncology practice. Future efforts should prioritize the development of cardio-oncology-specific implementation strategies, targeted provider education, and multidisciplinary collaboration to optimize preventive cardiovascular care in cancer survivors.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Government Medical College (IN), West Virginia University Hospitals (US), Smt. N.H.L. Municipal Medical College (IN), Indiana University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.