Abstract 4365699: Liver fibrosis as assessed by the fibrosis-5 (FIB-5) index in patients with heart failure: Insights from the PARADIGM-HF and PARAGON-HF trials

Background: By causing systemic venous congestion and hypoperfusion, heart failure can lead to liver dysfunction and these processes along with neurohumoral activation, inflammation, and metabolic dysfunction may lead to liver fibrosis. The fibrosis-5 (FIB-5) index, which incorporates serum albumin, alkaline phosphatase, aspartate transaminase, alanine aminotransferase and platelet count, is a marker of possible liver fibrosis. We evaluated the prevalence of an abnormal FIB-5 index in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), compared with (HFpEF), and the association between FIB-5 index and outcomes in these two types of HF. Research Questions: What is the prognostic value of the FIB-5 index in patients with HF across the range of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)? Methods: The PARADIGM-HF and PARAGON-HF trials were randomized, double-blind, active treatment-controlled trials which included 8442 HFrEF patients and 4822 HFpEF patients, respectively. The primary endpoint examined in this analysis was the composite of HF hospitalization or cardiovascular (CV) death. We compared outcomes according to quartiles of FIB-5 index. A low FIB-5 index is associated with hepatic fibrosis. Results: Overall, 44% of HFrEF patients and 42% of HFpEF patients had possible liver fibrosis as identified by a FIB-5 index <0 (which is reported to have a high specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for liver fibrosis in other diseases). Lower FIB-5 index was associated with adverse outcomes in both HF phenotypes (Figures). Comparing Quartile 1 to Quartile 4 of the FIB-5 index, gave a hazard ratio (HR) for the primary endpoint of 1.87 (95% CI 1.64-2.13) in PARADIGM-HF and 1.55 (95% CI 1.32-1.83) in PARAGON-HF. The corresponding HRs for CV death were 1.90 (95% CI 1.61–2.23) in PARADIGM-HF and 1.70 (95% CI 1.23-2.3) in PARAGON-HF. The benefit of sacubitril/valsartan was not modified by FIB-5 index. Conclusion: The FIB-5 index suggests liver fibrosis is common in both HFrEF and HFpEF and is prognostically important, regardless of ejection fraction phenotype.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4365699
Primary Topic
Heart Failure Treatment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4365699: Liver fibrosis as assessed by the fibrosis-5 (FIB-5) index in patients with heart failure: Insights from the PARADIGM-HF and PARAGON-HF trials

Alan Henderson, Inder S. Anand, Pardeep S. Jhund, Karl Swedberg et al.
Circulation
Heart Failure Treatment and Management
article

Abstract 4365699: Liver fibrosis as assessed by the fibrosis-5 (FIB-5) index in patients with heart failure: Insights from the PARADIGM-HF and PARAGON-HF trials

Alan Henderson, Inder S. Anand, Pardeep S. Jhund, Karl Swedberg, John J.V. McMurray, Felipe A. Martínez, Faiez M. Zannad, Milton Packer, Michael R. Zile, Scott David Solomon, Adel R. Rizkala, Muthiah Vaduganathan, Arzu Kalaycı, Aldo P. Maggioni, Akshay S. Desai, Mingming Yang, Daniel Pham, Jean L. Rouleau, Marc A. Pfeffer, Dirk van Veldhuisen
article en

Abstract

Background: By causing systemic venous congestion and hypoperfusion, heart failure can lead to liver dysfunction and these processes along with neurohumoral activation, inflammation, and metabolic dysfunction may lead to liver fibrosis. The fibrosis-5 (FIB-5) index, which incorporates serum albumin, alkaline phosphatase, aspartate transaminase, alanine aminotransferase and platelet count, is a marker of possible liver fibrosis. We evaluated the prevalence of an abnormal FIB-5 index in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), compared with (HFpEF), and the association between FIB-5 index and outcomes in these two types of HF. Research Questions: What is the prognostic value of the FIB-5 index in patients with HF across the range of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)? Methods: The PARADIGM-HF and PARAGON-HF trials were randomized, double-blind, active treatment-controlled trials which included 8442 HFrEF patients and 4822 HFpEF patients, respectively. The primary endpoint examined in this analysis was the composite of HF hospitalization or cardiovascular (CV) death. We compared outcomes according to quartiles of FIB-5 index. A low FIB-5 index is associated with hepatic fibrosis. Results: Overall, 44% of HFrEF patients and 42% of HFpEF patients had possible liver fibrosis as identified by a FIB-5 index <0 (which is reported to have a high specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for liver fibrosis in other diseases). Lower FIB-5 index was associated with adverse outcomes in both HF phenotypes (Figures). Comparing Quartile 1 to Quartile 4 of the FIB-5 index, gave a hazard ratio (HR) for the primary endpoint of 1.87 (95% CI 1.64-2.13) in PARADIGM-HF and 1.55 (95% CI 1.32-1.83) in PARAGON-HF. The corresponding HRs for CV death were 1.90 (95% CI 1.61–2.23) in PARADIGM-HF and 1.70 (95% CI 1.23-2.3) in PARAGON-HF. The benefit of sacubitril/valsartan was not modified by FIB-5 index. Conclusion: The FIB-5 index suggests liver fibrosis is common in both HFrEF and HFpEF and is prognostically important, regardless of ejection fraction phenotype.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), Medical University of South Carolina (US), University of Groningen (NL), Montreal Heart Institute (CA), British Heart Foundation (GB), VA San Diego Healthcare System (US), Instituto Médico DAMIC (AR), Dialyse Centrum Groningen (NL), Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi (IT), Novartis (United States) (US), Baylor Jack and Jane Hamilton Heart and Vascular Hospital (US), Université de Lorraine (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Heart Failure Treatment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.