Abstract 4342105: Impact of frailty on in-hospital outcome of STEMI hospitalization: Analysis of National Inpatient Sample

Background and Purpose: National data and trends on the impact of frailty on ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) are lacking. Methods: Retrospective data were extracted from the United States National Inpatient Sample from October 2015 to 2021 for hospitalizations with a STEMI diagnosis. A total of 900,935 STEMI hospitalizations were included in the final cohort. Based on Risk Analysis Index (RAI) scores, hospitalizations are categorized into robust, normal, frail, and very frail groups. Results: Frail and very frail hospitalizations account for about 6% of total hospitalizations. The in-hospital mortality rates for robust, normal, frail, and very frail are 5.09%, 14.49%, 30.67%, and 32.88%, respectively. Compared to robust and normal hospitalizations, Frail and very frail hospitalizations are less likely to receive primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI). For overall hospitalizations, the odds ratios for in-hospital mortality for pPCI treated robust, normal, frail, and very frail hospitalizations are 0.23 [95% CI (0.22-0.25)]; p<0.001, 0.28 [95% CI (0.27-0.30)]; p<0.001, 0.34 [95% CI (0.30-0.37)]; p<0.001, and 0.35 [95% CI (0.30-0.42)]; p<0.001, respectively. The reduction of in-hospital mortality with pPCI treatment is consistent after propensity score matching for each frailty groups. Fewer patients need to be treated to prevent one additional in-hospital death in the frail and very frail groups compared to the robust and normal groups (number needed to treat (NNT)=4 in the very frail group and NNT=5 in frail group, whereas NNT =10 in the robust group). Conclusions: This analysis highlights the worse in-hospital outcomes of frail and very frail hospitalizations for STEMI patients. Despite the fact that pPCI consistently shows a significant reduction in in-hospital mortality. frail and very frail hospitalizations are less likely to receive this treatment. This underscores the need for careful consideration of frailty in treatment decisions, as timely pPCI may improve outcomes even in these high-risk population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4342105
Primary Topic
Frailty in Older Adults
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4342105: Impact of frailty on in-hospital outcome of STEMI hospitalization: Analysis of National Inpatient Sample

Mingyou Zhang, Jing Wu
Circulation
Frailty in Older Adults
article

Abstract 4342105: Impact of frailty on in-hospital outcome of STEMI hospitalization: Analysis of National Inpatient Sample

Mingyou Zhang, Jing Wu
article en

Abstract

Background and Purpose: National data and trends on the impact of frailty on ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) are lacking. Methods: Retrospective data were extracted from the United States National Inpatient Sample from October 2015 to 2021 for hospitalizations with a STEMI diagnosis. A total of 900,935 STEMI hospitalizations were included in the final cohort. Based on Risk Analysis Index (RAI) scores, hospitalizations are categorized into robust, normal, frail, and very frail groups. Results: Frail and very frail hospitalizations account for about 6% of total hospitalizations. The in-hospital mortality rates for robust, normal, frail, and very frail are 5.09%, 14.49%, 30.67%, and 32.88%, respectively. Compared to robust and normal hospitalizations, Frail and very frail hospitalizations are less likely to receive primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI). For overall hospitalizations, the odds ratios for in-hospital mortality for pPCI treated robust, normal, frail, and very frail hospitalizations are 0.23 [95% CI (0.22-0.25)]; p<0.001, 0.28 [95% CI (0.27-0.30)]; p<0.001, 0.34 [95% CI (0.30-0.37)]; p<0.001, and 0.35 [95% CI (0.30-0.42)]; p<0.001, respectively. The reduction of in-hospital mortality with pPCI treatment is consistent after propensity score matching for each frailty groups. Fewer patients need to be treated to prevent one additional in-hospital death in the frail and very frail groups compared to the robust and normal groups (number needed to treat (NNT)=4 in the very frail group and NNT=5 in frail group, whereas NNT =10 in the robust group). Conclusions: This analysis highlights the worse in-hospital outcomes of frail and very frail hospitalizations for STEMI patients. Despite the fact that pPCI consistently shows a significant reduction in in-hospital mortality. frail and very frail hospitalizations are less likely to receive this treatment. This underscores the need for careful consideration of frailty in treatment decisions, as timely pPCI may improve outcomes even in these high-risk population.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Jilin Medical University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Frailty in Older Adults
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.