Abstract 4346538: Safety and Effectiveness of Metabolic and Bariatric Procedures in Heart Failure: A Single-Center Cohort Study

Background: Metabolic and bariatric procedures are associated with reduced heart failure (HF) incidence among individuals with obesity, but studies evaluating their safety and effectiveness in persons with obesity and established HF are scarce. Aims: To explore the safety and effectiveness of metabolic and bariatric procedures, including surgical and endoscopic interventions, among individuals with and without HF. Methods: In this single-center retrospective cohort study spanning 2021-2023, persons with HF in the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) were identified using external adjudication criteria. Our primary objective was to examine 30-day safety outcomes by HF status. Secondary objectives included the evaluation of temporal changes in body weight (baseline to 30 days and 1 year) and changes in medication use between (baseline to 1 year). Results: Among 1,678 metabolic and bariatric procedures conducted over the study period (mean age, 43±12 years; 86% female; mean body mass index [BMI], 42±8 kg/m 2 ), 41 (2.4%) were performed in persons with HF. The most common (80%) index metabolic and bariatric procedure in HF was laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Compared with persons without HF, those with HF tended to have older age, male sex, higher BMI, worse kidney function, and a greater burden of obesity-related complications. Persons with HF did not appear to experience higher risk of any 30-day complication vs. those without HF (24% vs. 16%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.64; 95% CI, 0.76 to 3.58; P =0.21) ( Table ). There were no instances of death at 30 days among persons with HF. However, HF was associated with higher odds of unplanned readmission (aOR, 2.97; 95% CI, 1.06 to 8.33; P =0.038). Overall, 30-day change in body weight was similar between those with (-5.9%; 95% CI, -6.9 to -4.9%) and without HF (-6.2%; 95% CI, -6.4 to -6.0%; P =0.57). By 1-year, individuals with HF experienced significant reductions in body weight (mean change, -18.7%; 95% CI, -22.1 to -15.3%; P <0.001), HF and other cardiovascular medications ( P =0.003), glucose-lowering medications ( P <0.001), and loop diuretics ( P =0.003) ( Figure ). Conclusions: These findings suggest that metabolic and bariatric procedures are safe and effective among persons with obesity and established HF, and may inform future prospective studies in this population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4346538
Primary Topic
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4346538: Safety and Effectiveness of Metabolic and Bariatric Procedures in Heart Failure: A Single-Center Cohort Study

John W. Ostrominski, Elke Platz, Pichamol Jirapinyo, David L. Spector et al.
Circulation
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
article

Abstract 4346538: Safety and Effectiveness of Metabolic and Bariatric Procedures in Heart Failure: A Single-Center Cohort Study

John W. Ostrominski, Elke Platz, Pichamol Jirapinyo, David L. Spector, Eric G. Sheu, Madeleine Schwede, Jenna Lodi
article en

Abstract

Background: Metabolic and bariatric procedures are associated with reduced heart failure (HF) incidence among individuals with obesity, but studies evaluating their safety and effectiveness in persons with obesity and established HF are scarce. Aims: To explore the safety and effectiveness of metabolic and bariatric procedures, including surgical and endoscopic interventions, among individuals with and without HF. Methods: In this single-center retrospective cohort study spanning 2021-2023, persons with HF in the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) were identified using external adjudication criteria. Our primary objective was to examine 30-day safety outcomes by HF status. Secondary objectives included the evaluation of temporal changes in body weight (baseline to 30 days and 1 year) and changes in medication use between (baseline to 1 year). Results: Among 1,678 metabolic and bariatric procedures conducted over the study period (mean age, 43±12 years; 86% female; mean body mass index [BMI], 42±8 kg/m 2 ), 41 (2.4%) were performed in persons with HF. The most common (80%) index metabolic and bariatric procedure in HF was laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Compared with persons without HF, those with HF tended to have older age, male sex, higher BMI, worse kidney function, and a greater burden of obesity-related complications. Persons with HF did not appear to experience higher risk of any 30-day complication vs. those without HF (24% vs. 16%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.64; 95% CI, 0.76 to 3.58; P =0.21) ( Table ). There were no instances of death at 30 days among persons with HF. However, HF was associated with higher odds of unplanned readmission (aOR, 2.97; 95% CI, 1.06 to 8.33; P =0.038). Overall, 30-day change in body weight was similar between those with (-5.9%; 95% CI, -6.9 to -4.9%) and without HF (-6.2%; 95% CI, -6.4 to -6.0%; P =0.57). By 1-year, individuals with HF experienced significant reductions in body weight (mean change, -18.7%; 95% CI, -22.1 to -15.3%; P <0.001), HF and other cardiovascular medications ( P =0.003), glucose-lowering medications ( P <0.001), and loop diuretics ( P =0.003) ( Figure ). Conclusions: These findings suggest that metabolic and bariatric procedures are safe and effective among persons with obesity and established HF, and may inform future prospective studies in this population.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.