Abstract 4370245: Smarter Together: How Artificial Intelligence Algorithms are Enhancing Clinicians in Early Detection of CHD Congenital Heart Disease?

Background: Congenital heart disease (CHD) is the most common congenital anomaly, affecting 8–10 per 1,000 live births globally, and is a leading cause of perinatal morbidity and mortality. Despite advances in fetal imaging, early and accurate CHD detection remains challenging, hindered by operator dependency and the subtlety of prenatal cardiac anomalies. Artificial intelligence (AI), particularly deep learning algorithms, offers a novel analytical framework for automated, high-throughput analysis of fetal cardiac imaging, with the potential to transform prenatal diagnostic pathways. Objectives: To systematically evaluate and quantitatively synthesize the diagnostic performance of AI algorithms in detecting fetal CHD. Methods: A comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Science, and Ovid Medline was conducted from inception through June 2025 for studies reporting diagnostic accuracy of AI algorithms for fetal CHD using any imaging modality. Three reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using QUADAS-2, resolving discrepancies by consensus. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed in R, adhering to PRISMA-DTA guidelines, to generate pooled accuracy estimates for AI algorithms. Results: Across eligible studies, AI-augmented clinical decision-making achieved a pooled diagnostic accuracy of 0.86 (95% CI, 0.81–0.89), significantly exceeding the accuracy of non-AI approaches (0.83 [0.82–0.85]; p = 0.0043). Subgroup analyses stratified by clinician expertise (trainee, generalist, fellow, expert) consistently demonstrated incremental accuracy gains with AI augmentation, with the greatest relative improvement among trainees (AI: 0.82 [0.64–0.93] vs. non-AI: 0.72 [0.49–0.87]; p = 0.0047). Heterogeneity was moderate to high (I 2 up to 91.2%), but the directionality of effect was robust. Conclusions: AI and deep learning algorithms substantially enhance the diagnostic accuracy of fetal CHD detection, particularly benefiting less experienced clinicians. These findings highlight the transformative potential of AI to address critical diagnostic gaps, reduce operator dependency, and improve prenatal outcomes in CHD.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4370245
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Congenital Heart Disease Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4370245: Smarter Together: How Artificial Intelligence Algorithms are Enhancing Clinicians in Early Detection of CHD Congenital Heart Disease?

Krish Patel, RUSHI VAGHELA, E. Radha Krishnan, Gayathri Dantu et al.
1 citations
Circulation
Congenital Heart Disease Studies
1.35
article

Abstract 4370245: Smarter Together: How Artificial Intelligence Algorithms are Enhancing Clinicians in Early Detection of CHD Congenital Heart Disease?

Krish Patel, RUSHI VAGHELA, E. Radha Krishnan, Gayathri Dantu, Ramya Elangovan, Jansi Sethuraj, Kavin Elangovan, Taral Dontulwar
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Background: Congenital heart disease (CHD) is the most common congenital anomaly, affecting 8–10 per 1,000 live births globally, and is a leading cause of perinatal morbidity and mortality. Despite advances in fetal imaging, early and accurate CHD detection remains challenging, hindered by operator dependency and the subtlety of prenatal cardiac anomalies. Artificial intelligence (AI), particularly deep learning algorithms, offers a novel analytical framework for automated, high-throughput analysis of fetal cardiac imaging, with the potential to transform prenatal diagnostic pathways. Objectives: To systematically evaluate and quantitatively synthesize the diagnostic performance of AI algorithms in detecting fetal CHD. Methods: A comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Science, and Ovid Medline was conducted from inception through June 2025 for studies reporting diagnostic accuracy of AI algorithms for fetal CHD using any imaging modality. Three reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using QUADAS-2, resolving discrepancies by consensus. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed in R, adhering to PRISMA-DTA guidelines, to generate pooled accuracy estimates for AI algorithms. Results: Across eligible studies, AI-augmented clinical decision-making achieved a pooled diagnostic accuracy of 0.86 (95% CI, 0.81–0.89), significantly exceeding the accuracy of non-AI approaches (0.83 [0.82–0.85]; p = 0.0043). Subgroup analyses stratified by clinician expertise (trainee, generalist, fellow, expert) consistently demonstrated incremental accuracy gains with AI augmentation, with the greatest relative improvement among trainees (AI: 0.82 [0.64–0.93] vs. non-AI: 0.72 [0.49–0.87]; p = 0.0047). Heterogeneity was moderate to high (I 2 up to 91.2%), but the directionality of effect was robust. Conclusions: AI and deep learning algorithms substantially enhance the diagnostic accuracy of fetal CHD detection, particularly benefiting less experienced clinicians. These findings highlight the transformative potential of AI to address critical diagnostic gaps, reduce operator dependency, and improve prenatal outcomes in CHD.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Thiruvalluvar University (IN), Aims Community College (US), Government Medical College (IN), CU Shah Medical College and Hospital (IN), Smt. N.H.L. Municipal Medical College (IN), The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Congenital Heart Disease Studies
1.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.