Differential prognostic significance of tumor size and node in invasive lobular carcinoma of breast

Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) is the second most common histological type of breast cancer. Despite its distinct clinical and pathological characteristics, ILC shares the same prognostic classification system and adjuvant treatment strategies as invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). We reviewed the data of the 16,365 IDC and ILC patients who were treated between 2005 and 2022 at Seoul National University Hospital (SNUH). Also, we conducted a parallel analysis using the data of 247,290 IDC and ILC treated between 2010 and 2015 from the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) database. ILC patients were older at diagnosis, had larger tumors, and ILC tumors were predominantly HR-positive/HER2-negative. ILC exhibited unique prognostic implications of anatomic features. Unlike in IDC, the tumor size and nodal status showed differential prognostic impact on survival in ILC. While there was no significant survival difference for different T stages in ILC patients, the prognostic impact of nodal involvement was more pronounced for ILC in the SNUH dataset. Similar survival implication of tumor size and nodal involvement was observed for the ILC cases in the SEER dataset. In ILC, tumor size may not be as strong a predictor of survival as in IDC, while advanced nodal involvement carries a particularly high risk for breast cancer-specific mortality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Breast Cancer Research
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-025-02141-3
Primary Topic
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Differential prognostic significance of tumor size and node in invasive lobular carcinoma of breast

Ik Beom Shin, Wonshik Han, Eunhye Kang, Jinyoung Byeon et al.
Breast Cancer Research
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
article

Differential prognostic significance of tumor size and node in invasive lobular carcinoma of breast

Ik Beom Shin, Wonshik Han, Eunhye Kang, Jinyoung Byeon, Han‐Byoel Lee, Ji-Jung Jung, Hyeong‐Gon Moon, Jong-Ho Cheun, Hong Kyu Kim, Yunhee Choi
article en

Abstract

Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) is the second most common histological type of breast cancer. Despite its distinct clinical and pathological characteristics, ILC shares the same prognostic classification system and adjuvant treatment strategies as invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). We reviewed the data of the 16,365 IDC and ILC patients who were treated between 2005 and 2022 at Seoul National University Hospital (SNUH). Also, we conducted a parallel analysis using the data of 247,290 IDC and ILC treated between 2010 and 2015 from the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) database. ILC patients were older at diagnosis, had larger tumors, and ILC tumors were predominantly HR-positive/HER2-negative. ILC exhibited unique prognostic implications of anatomic features. Unlike in IDC, the tumor size and nodal status showed differential prognostic impact on survival in ILC. While there was no significant survival difference for different T stages in ILC patients, the prognostic impact of nodal involvement was more pronounced for ILC in the SNUH dataset. Similar survival implication of tumor size and nodal involvement was observed for the ILC cases in the SEER dataset. In ILC, tumor size may not be as strong a predictor of survival as in IDC, while advanced nodal involvement carries a particularly high risk for breast cancer-specific mortality.

Breast Cancer ResearchVol. 27(1)
Seoul National University (KR), Cancer Research Institute (US), Seoul Metropolitan Government (KR), New Generation University College (ET), Seoul National University Hospital (KR), SNUH SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center (KR), National University College (PR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.