Abstract 4369278: Real-World Adverse Events of the Aurora Extravascular Implantable Cardiac Defibrillator: Insights from the United States FDA MAUDE Registry

Introduction: Extravascular implantable cardioverter defibrillators (EV-ICD) utilize a substernal lead to provide the benefits of ICDs without associated vascular risks. Only a few currently exist, and one such is the Aurora EV-ICD TM (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN). Device-related, real-world complication data remains limited. Objectives: We reviewed the United States Food and Drug Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database for adverse events involving the Aurora EV-ICD. Methods: The MAUDE database is a real-world registry of device-related adverse events. We reviewed this on 6/4/2025 for all events since 10/1/2023 – shortly after it was approved for use. Duplicate reports were removed, and adverse events and device issues were categorized and analyzed. Results: A total of 215 reports were identified, with an average age of 48.3±16.8 years and 75.0% male gender. Adverse events were analyzed as device- and patient-related. The most common device problem was sensing issues (40.4%), which included over- (11.1%) and under-sensing (2.3%); adverse events without an identified problem also occurred frequently (30.7%). The most common patient events occurred without clinical signs or symptoms (35.3%) but were followed by infection (37.3%) and inappropriate shocks (24.7%). This resulted in injury in 77.7% of cases, with death occurring in rare (1.9%) cases. Conclusion: EV-ICDs are an alternative defibrillator option but have shown notable early challenges, including frequent sensing issues, inappropriate shocks, and a high rate of infections. These findings underscore the need for careful patient selection and follow-up. However, the reliance on the MAUDE limits generalizability, and further studies are needed to evaluate its safety and efficacy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4369278
Primary Topic
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4369278: Real-World Adverse Events of the Aurora Extravascular Implantable Cardiac Defibrillator: Insights from the United States FDA MAUDE Registry

Dhanunjaya Lakkireddy, Michael Klotz, Naga Venkata K. Pothineni, Aashish Katapadi et al.
Circulation
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
article

Abstract 4369278: Real-World Adverse Events of the Aurora Extravascular Implantable Cardiac Defibrillator: Insights from the United States FDA MAUDE Registry

Dhanunjaya Lakkireddy, Michael Klotz, Naga Venkata K. Pothineni, Aashish Katapadi, Rajesh Kabra, Douglas Darden, Rakesh Gopinathannair, Jiaqi Mi, Atul Kabra, Aashika Katapadi, Eli Herink
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Extravascular implantable cardioverter defibrillators (EV-ICD) utilize a substernal lead to provide the benefits of ICDs without associated vascular risks. Only a few currently exist, and one such is the Aurora EV-ICD TM (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN). Device-related, real-world complication data remains limited. Objectives: We reviewed the United States Food and Drug Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database for adverse events involving the Aurora EV-ICD. Methods: The MAUDE database is a real-world registry of device-related adverse events. We reviewed this on 6/4/2025 for all events since 10/1/2023 – shortly after it was approved for use. Duplicate reports were removed, and adverse events and device issues were categorized and analyzed. Results: A total of 215 reports were identified, with an average age of 48.3±16.8 years and 75.0% male gender. Adverse events were analyzed as device- and patient-related. The most common device problem was sensing issues (40.4%), which included over- (11.1%) and under-sensing (2.3%); adverse events without an identified problem also occurred frequently (30.7%). The most common patient events occurred without clinical signs or symptoms (35.3%) but were followed by infection (37.3%) and inappropriate shocks (24.7%). This resulted in injury in 77.7% of cases, with death occurring in rare (1.9%) cases. Conclusion: EV-ICDs are an alternative defibrillator option but have shown notable early challenges, including frequent sensing issues, inappropriate shocks, and a high rate of infections. These findings underscore the need for careful patient selection and follow-up. However, the reliance on the MAUDE limits generalizability, and further studies are needed to evaluate its safety and efficacy.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Heart Rhythm Society (US), George Washington University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.