Trust dynamics and the role of alternating modes of collaboration in hybrid work

Hybrid work increasingly shifts collaboration toward technology-based virtual interactions parallel to traditional face-to-face contacts. Since trust dynamics are a crucial part of collaboration in organizations, we investigate how they develop in this hybrid approach to collaboration. Findings from a case study conducted during an innovation contest at a large university reveal that alternating between collaboration modes in hybrid work can intensify trust dynamics, as online practices that supplement offline practices can shape the trust dynamics relevant to effective collaboration. We identify five stages of trust dynamics: formation, facilitation, establishment, acceleration, and reinforcement of trust. While we consider operating practices to support trust intensification, we find that users’ embrace of both offline and online spaces is the driving force that triggers the transition from one stage of trust dynamics to the next. Our findings demonstrate the Janus-faced nature of technological affordances: while technologies such as instant messaging are typically used for task-related exchanges in teams, in our hybrid collaboration setting, we found that these technologies were also used for non-task-related exchanges, which we usually observe in face-to-face settings. This finding presents a significant theoretical puzzle related to the evolution of trust, which is greatly determined by the trust and reliance behavior of people: Whereas disclosure behavior has historically been linked to in-person interactions and reliance behavior to operational duties, the growing use of technology in hybrid work environments seems to blur these concepts of trusting behavior. This requires a more thorough investigation of how disclosure and reliance behaviors and trust dynamics shift in hybrid work environments, especially where operational and emotional behaviors converge. The study contributes to research by developing a novel framework for the dynamics of trust in hybrid work.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
German Journal of Human Resource Management Zeitschrift für Personalforschung
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/23970022251379815
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Team Dynamics and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trust dynamics and the role of alternating modes of collaboration in hybrid work

Stephan Kaiser, Verena Bader, Linda M. Rave
1 citations
German Journal of Human Resource Management Zeitschrift für Personalforschung
Team Dynamics and Performance
2.44
article

Trust dynamics and the role of alternating modes of collaboration in hybrid work

Stephan Kaiser, Verena Bader, Linda M. Rave
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Hybrid work increasingly shifts collaboration toward technology-based virtual interactions parallel to traditional face-to-face contacts. Since trust dynamics are a crucial part of collaboration in organizations, we investigate how they develop in this hybrid approach to collaboration. Findings from a case study conducted during an innovation contest at a large university reveal that alternating between collaboration modes in hybrid work can intensify trust dynamics, as online practices that supplement offline practices can shape the trust dynamics relevant to effective collaboration. We identify five stages of trust dynamics: formation, facilitation, establishment, acceleration, and reinforcement of trust. While we consider operating practices to support trust intensification, we find that users’ embrace of both offline and online spaces is the driving force that triggers the transition from one stage of trust dynamics to the next. Our findings demonstrate the Janus-faced nature of technological affordances: while technologies such as instant messaging are typically used for task-related exchanges in teams, in our hybrid collaboration setting, we found that these technologies were also used for non-task-related exchanges, which we usually observe in face-to-face settings. This finding presents a significant theoretical puzzle related to the evolution of trust, which is greatly determined by the trust and reliance behavior of people: Whereas disclosure behavior has historically been linked to in-person interactions and reliance behavior to operational duties, the growing use of technology in hybrid work environments seems to blur these concepts of trusting behavior. This requires a more thorough investigation of how disclosure and reliance behaviors and trust dynamics shift in hybrid work environments, especially where operational and emotional behaviors converge. The study contributes to research by developing a novel framework for the dynamics of trust in hybrid work.

German Journal of Human Resource Management Zeitschrift für Personalforschung
Vienna University of Economics and Business (AT), Universität der Bundeswehr München (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Team Dynamics and Performance
2.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.