Abstract 4341783: Poor Glycemic Control is Associated with Increased Risk of Clinical Events in Older Diabetic Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease

Background: We recently found poor glycemic control (Hgb A1c >8%) to be strongly associated with increased risk of cardiovascular (CV) and limb events in diabetic patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD). Hypothesis: The association between glycemic control and risk of CV and limb events is modified by age. Methods: Using data from Peripheral Artery Disease: Long-term Survival Study (PEARLS), we identified diabetic PAD patients with at least one Hgb A1c in the two years before the index (date of PAD diagnosis), and at least one Hgb A1c within 2 years after the index but before first CV (myocardial infarction, stroke) or limb (chronic limb threatening ischemia, major amputation) event. Longitudinal glycemic control was assessed using HgbA1c and categorized as tight (≤7%; reference), moderate (>7% to 8%), and poor (>8%). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models with longitudinal HgbA1c as a time-varying exposure and death as a competing risk examined the association between glycemic control and risk of clinical events. Analyses were stratified by median age (<70 years vs. >70 years). Results: Among 45,934 patients, 97.8% were men, and 19.8% were Black. Compared to the <70-year group, those >70 years had lower baseline Hgb A1c (7.3% vs. 7.8%). Older patients were also less likely to be Black, be active smokers but had a higher prevalence of most co-morbidities (Table 1). In risk-adjusted analyses using longitudinal HgbA1c as a time-varying exposure, poor glycemic control was associated with increased risk of CV events (Figure 1), with Hgb A1c >8% associated with a 44% increased hazard compared to HgbA1c <7% category (sub-distribution hazard ratio [sHR]: 1.44; 95% CI: 1.37-1.52). The association between glycemic control and risk of limb events was even stronger, with 74% higher risk in those with HgbA1c>8%, compared to HgbA1c <7% (sHR: 1.74; 95% CI: 1.65-1.83; Figure 2). In both age groups, there was no heterogeneity in the association between glycemic control with CV (P-value for interaction term: 0.40) and limb events (P-value for interaction term: 0.09). Conclusions: We found a graded, positive association between poor glycemic control and risk of CV and limb events. This association was consistent in both younger and older patients. Our findings indicate that optimal glycemic control may be beneficial in reducing the risk of clinical events, regardless of age.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4341783
Primary Topic
Peripheral Artery Disease Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4341783: Poor Glycemic Control is Associated with Increased Risk of Clinical Events in Older Diabetic Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease

Mary Vaughan‐Sarrazin, Rohit Nathani, Saket R. Girotra, Cathy Nguyen et al.
Circulation
Peripheral Artery Disease Management
article

Abstract 4341783: Poor Glycemic Control is Associated with Increased Risk of Clinical Events in Older Diabetic Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease

Mary Vaughan‐Sarrazin, Rohit Nathani, Saket R. Girotra, Cathy Nguyen, Qiang Li, Medha Somisetty, Feroz James
article en

Abstract

Background: We recently found poor glycemic control (Hgb A1c >8%) to be strongly associated with increased risk of cardiovascular (CV) and limb events in diabetic patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD). Hypothesis: The association between glycemic control and risk of CV and limb events is modified by age. Methods: Using data from Peripheral Artery Disease: Long-term Survival Study (PEARLS), we identified diabetic PAD patients with at least one Hgb A1c in the two years before the index (date of PAD diagnosis), and at least one Hgb A1c within 2 years after the index but before first CV (myocardial infarction, stroke) or limb (chronic limb threatening ischemia, major amputation) event. Longitudinal glycemic control was assessed using HgbA1c and categorized as tight (≤7%; reference), moderate (>7% to 8%), and poor (>8%). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models with longitudinal HgbA1c as a time-varying exposure and death as a competing risk examined the association between glycemic control and risk of clinical events. Analyses were stratified by median age (<70 years vs. >70 years). Results: Among 45,934 patients, 97.8% were men, and 19.8% were Black. Compared to the <70-year group, those >70 years had lower baseline Hgb A1c (7.3% vs. 7.8%). Older patients were also less likely to be Black, be active smokers but had a higher prevalence of most co-morbidities (Table 1). In risk-adjusted analyses using longitudinal HgbA1c as a time-varying exposure, poor glycemic control was associated with increased risk of CV events (Figure 1), with Hgb A1c >8% associated with a 44% increased hazard compared to HgbA1c <7% category (sub-distribution hazard ratio [sHR]: 1.44; 95% CI: 1.37-1.52). The association between glycemic control and risk of limb events was even stronger, with 74% higher risk in those with HgbA1c>8%, compared to HgbA1c <7% (sHR: 1.74; 95% CI: 1.65-1.83; Figure 2). In both age groups, there was no heterogeneity in the association between glycemic control with CV (P-value for interaction term: 0.40) and limb events (P-value for interaction term: 0.09). Conclusions: We found a graded, positive association between poor glycemic control and risk of CV and limb events. This association was consistent in both younger and older patients. Our findings indicate that optimal glycemic control may be beneficial in reducing the risk of clinical events, regardless of age.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
University of Iowa (US), Southwestern Medical Center (US), Southwestern Medical Center (US), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Peripheral Artery Disease Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.