Abstract 4368827: Impact of Timing of Repeat Catheter Ablation on Long-Term Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence: Insights from the ITHACA Database

Background: Recurrent atrial fibrillation (AF) following catheter ablation remains a significant clinical challenge, affecting 20–40% of patients. While current guidelines recommend a 3-month “blanking period” before considering reintervention, the optimal timing for repeat ablation remains undefined. Objectives: To compare long term rates of AF recurrence among patients undergoing repeat ablation based on timing of re-intervention. Methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective observational study using the ITHACA database, including patients who experienced AF after an initial ablation and underwent a repeat procedure. The primary outcome was a composite of AF recurrence defined as clinical AF recurrence, anti-arrhythmic use, cardioversion post-blanking period or a third ablation. Time-to-repeat ablation between patients who experience recurrence post second ablation was compared to patients who did not have a second recurrence using a two-sample t-test. A decision tree classifier was used to identify time intervals between index and repeat atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation that best predicts risk of recurrence. The Gini index guided the tree's construction, optimizing the separation of patients into recurrence and non-recurrence groups based on the time interval. Results: Of 3129 patients, 616 (19.6%) underwent repeat ablation. Among them, 105 (17%) had no AF recurrence, while 511 (83%) did. Median time to repeat ablation was 576 days (IQR 744 days). Patients who remained AF-free had a significantly shorter mean interval between ablations (656 vs. 833 days; p < 0.0001). The decision tree identified three distinct timing intervals differentiating our cohort into patients who were more or less likely to have AF recurrence post repeat ablation. Among patients with repeat ablation >1274 days after the index, 95% had recurrence. For those with repeat ablation between 273–1274 days, 84% had recurrence. Patients undergoing repeat ablation within 272 days of index ablation had the lowest rate of recurrence (77%). Conclusion: Patients who underwent repeat ablation after a shorter interval between index and repeat intervention had lower rates of long-term AF recurrence. Our decision tree model identified reintervention within <272 days post index as a potential marker of improved long-term outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4368827
Primary Topic
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4368827: Impact of Timing of Repeat Catheter Ablation on Long-Term Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence: Insights from the ITHACA Database

Laurence Mark Epstein, Shehzad Huda, Cassie Wang, Dimitrios Varrias et al.
Circulation
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
article

Abstract 4368827: Impact of Timing of Repeat Catheter Ablation on Long-Term Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence: Insights from the ITHACA Database

Laurence Mark Epstein, Shehzad Huda, Cassie Wang, Dimitrios Varrias, Vasiliki Patsiou, Stavros Mountantonakis, Kuan‐Yu Lin, Kristie Coleman
article en

Abstract

Background: Recurrent atrial fibrillation (AF) following catheter ablation remains a significant clinical challenge, affecting 20–40% of patients. While current guidelines recommend a 3-month “blanking period” before considering reintervention, the optimal timing for repeat ablation remains undefined. Objectives: To compare long term rates of AF recurrence among patients undergoing repeat ablation based on timing of re-intervention. Methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective observational study using the ITHACA database, including patients who experienced AF after an initial ablation and underwent a repeat procedure. The primary outcome was a composite of AF recurrence defined as clinical AF recurrence, anti-arrhythmic use, cardioversion post-blanking period or a third ablation. Time-to-repeat ablation between patients who experience recurrence post second ablation was compared to patients who did not have a second recurrence using a two-sample t-test. A decision tree classifier was used to identify time intervals between index and repeat atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation that best predicts risk of recurrence. The Gini index guided the tree's construction, optimizing the separation of patients into recurrence and non-recurrence groups based on the time interval. Results: Of 3129 patients, 616 (19.6%) underwent repeat ablation. Among them, 105 (17%) had no AF recurrence, while 511 (83%) did. Median time to repeat ablation was 576 days (IQR 744 days). Patients who remained AF-free had a significantly shorter mean interval between ablations (656 vs. 833 days; p < 0.0001). The decision tree identified three distinct timing intervals differentiating our cohort into patients who were more or less likely to have AF recurrence post repeat ablation. Among patients with repeat ablation >1274 days after the index, 95% had recurrence. For those with repeat ablation between 273–1274 days, 84% had recurrence. Patients undergoing repeat ablation within 272 days of index ablation had the lowest rate of recurrence (77%). Conclusion: Patients who underwent repeat ablation after a shorter interval between index and repeat intervention had lower rates of long-term AF recurrence. Our decision tree model identified reintervention within <272 days post index as a potential marker of improved long-term outcomes.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Northwell Health (US), Feinstein Institute for Medical Research (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.