Abstract 4361308: Tirzepatide Reduces the Risk of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events: An Individual Participant Data Meta-analysis of Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trials

Background: Individual participant data (IPD) from Phase 3 trials of tirzepatide offer a unique opportunity to evaluate its CV efficacy and identify response correlates. These insights may guide the clinical use of the drug while we await results from CVOTs, particularly in examining its CV effectiveness. Aim: In this IPD meta-analysis, we sought to assess the CV efficacy of tirzepatide and identify predictors of treatment response. Methods: We pooled individual-level data from 11 Phase 3 RCTs comparing tirzepatide with placebo, insulin, or GLP-1 RAs in participants with or without T2D to assess tirzepatide’s CV efficacy. In the intervention arm, participants who received tirzepatide 15 mg/week—the maximum tolerated dose—were included and compared against pooled comparators, in line with ongoing CVOTs. MACE was a composite of adjudicated ACS, CVA, HF hospitalization, and CV death. We used a mixed-effects Cox proportional hazards model to model MACE, with the intervention as a fixed effect and the trial as a random effect. Inverse probability weighting (IPW) was employed to account for study design differences across RCTs. To identify response correlates within the tirzepatide arm, we analyzed the hazard of MACE for those who showed improvement in cardiometabolic components vs. those who did not. Results: There were 3,360 individuals in the tirzepatide 15 mg/week and 4,028 in the comparator arms across trials, with a median age of 55 years [IQR, 46-63] and 52% women. Over a median follow-up of 56 weeks [44-76], 119 (1.6%) experienced MACE. Tirzepatide 15 mg/week significantly reduced the risk of MACE (HR, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.51-0.87]), with an IPW-weighted incidence of MACE of 1.1% in the tirzepatide and 1.7 % in the comparator arms. Tirzepatide’s CV efficacy was consistent across subgroups, with more pronounced MACE benefits among individuals with vs. without obesity (P<0.001). In the tirzepatide arm, the hazard of MACE was up to 81% lower in participants who experienced improvements in weight, waist circumference (WC), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and fasting blood glucose (FBG), among other cardiometabolic components, compared with those without such improvements. Conclusion: Tirzepatide 15 mg/week reduces the risk of MACE by 33% with consistent efficacy across subgroups. Weight loss and reductions in WC, DBP, and FBG during tirzepatide therapy suggest potential long-term benefits for MACE, highlighting their role in personalized treatment recommendations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4361308
Primary Topic
Diabetes Treatment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4361308: Tirzepatide Reduces the Risk of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events: An Individual Participant Data Meta-analysis of Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trials

Ania M. Jastreboff, Rohan Khera, Dhruva Biswas, Arya Aminorroaya et al.
Circulation
Diabetes Treatment and Management
article

Abstract 4361308: Tirzepatide Reduces the Risk of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events: An Individual Participant Data Meta-analysis of Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trials

Ania M. Jastreboff, Rohan Khera, Dhruva Biswas, Arya Aminorroaya, Evangelos K. Oikonomou
article en

Abstract

Background: Individual participant data (IPD) from Phase 3 trials of tirzepatide offer a unique opportunity to evaluate its CV efficacy and identify response correlates. These insights may guide the clinical use of the drug while we await results from CVOTs, particularly in examining its CV effectiveness. Aim: In this IPD meta-analysis, we sought to assess the CV efficacy of tirzepatide and identify predictors of treatment response. Methods: We pooled individual-level data from 11 Phase 3 RCTs comparing tirzepatide with placebo, insulin, or GLP-1 RAs in participants with or without T2D to assess tirzepatide’s CV efficacy. In the intervention arm, participants who received tirzepatide 15 mg/week—the maximum tolerated dose—were included and compared against pooled comparators, in line with ongoing CVOTs. MACE was a composite of adjudicated ACS, CVA, HF hospitalization, and CV death. We used a mixed-effects Cox proportional hazards model to model MACE, with the intervention as a fixed effect and the trial as a random effect. Inverse probability weighting (IPW) was employed to account for study design differences across RCTs. To identify response correlates within the tirzepatide arm, we analyzed the hazard of MACE for those who showed improvement in cardiometabolic components vs. those who did not. Results: There were 3,360 individuals in the tirzepatide 15 mg/week and 4,028 in the comparator arms across trials, with a median age of 55 years [IQR, 46-63] and 52% women. Over a median follow-up of 56 weeks [44-76], 119 (1.6%) experienced MACE. Tirzepatide 15 mg/week significantly reduced the risk of MACE (HR, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.51-0.87]), with an IPW-weighted incidence of MACE of 1.1% in the tirzepatide and 1.7 % in the comparator arms. Tirzepatide’s CV efficacy was consistent across subgroups, with more pronounced MACE benefits among individuals with vs. without obesity (P<0.001). In the tirzepatide arm, the hazard of MACE was up to 81% lower in participants who experienced improvements in weight, waist circumference (WC), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and fasting blood glucose (FBG), among other cardiometabolic components, compared with those without such improvements. Conclusion: Tirzepatide 15 mg/week reduces the risk of MACE by 33% with consistent efficacy across subgroups. Weight loss and reductions in WC, DBP, and FBG during tirzepatide therapy suggest potential long-term benefits for MACE, highlighting their role in personalized treatment recommendations.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Yale University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Diabetes Treatment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.