Abstract 4365719: Personal Care Product Usage Patterns And Hypertension In U.S. Women From The Sister Study

Introduction: Personal care products (PCPs) are complex chemical mixtures, which include endocrine disrupting chemicals linked to elevated risk of hormonally-responsive chronic diseases. Blood pressure is influenced by sex hormones; however, the relationship between PCPs and hypertension is unclear. Hypothesis: We investigated whether PCP usage patterns were associated with risk of hypertension in U.S. women. Methods: The Sister Study is a prospective cohort study of 50,884 women recruited in 2003-2009. The participants self-reported their usage frequency of 41 PCPs in the 12-month period before baseline and doctor’s diagnosis of incident hypertension. We analyzed individual PCPs and four product groups (i.e., beauty, everyday hair, hygiene, and skincare products). Among product groups, latent class analyses were used to identify PCP usage patterns (“infrequent”, “moderate”, or “frequent”). Multivariable Cox regression was used to estimate the associations between PCPs and hypertension risk, adjusted for potential confounders. The population attributable risk percentage contrasting “frequent” versus “infrequent” users was calculated using Levin's formula. Results: We found an increasing dose-response relationship between beauty products and incident hypertension (p-trend<0.0001; Table 1), with frequent users having a significantly higher risk compared with infrequent users (Hazard Ratio (HR)=1.11 (95% confidence intervals (CI):1.05,1.16)). A similar dose-response relationship was found for hygiene products (p-trend<0.0001), with elevated risks observed in moderate (HR=1.07 (95%CI:1.01,1.13) and frequent (HR=1.13 (95%CI:1.08,1.19) users. An estimated 6.1% and 5.8% reduction in hypertension incidence would be observed among U.S. women with decreased use of beauty and hygiene products, respectively. Our findings were largely consistent across different subgroups defined by age, menopausal status, race, and socioeconomic status. The use of several individual everyday hair and skincare products was associated with increased risk of hypertension; however, latent classes of either everyday hair or skincare product use were not. Conclusions: We found that use of certain PCPs contribute to future development of hypertension, a strong but modifiable risk factor for most cardiovascular diseases. Our findings support the need to identify the pathogenic constituents of PCPs that drive hypertension risk.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4365719
Primary Topic
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4365719: Personal Care Product Usage Patterns And Hypertension In U.S. Women From The Sister Study

Che-Jung Chang, Shelton Lo, Dale P. Sandler, H‐P Wang et al.
Circulation
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
article

Abstract 4365719: Personal Care Product Usage Patterns And Hypertension In U.S. Women From The Sister Study

Che-Jung Chang, Shelton Lo, Dale P. Sandler, H‐P Wang, Véronique L. Roger, Alexandra J. White, Jason W.H. Wong, Jung‐Eun Lim, Gabriel Goodney
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Personal care products (PCPs) are complex chemical mixtures, which include endocrine disrupting chemicals linked to elevated risk of hormonally-responsive chronic diseases. Blood pressure is influenced by sex hormones; however, the relationship between PCPs and hypertension is unclear. Hypothesis: We investigated whether PCP usage patterns were associated with risk of hypertension in U.S. women. Methods: The Sister Study is a prospective cohort study of 50,884 women recruited in 2003-2009. The participants self-reported their usage frequency of 41 PCPs in the 12-month period before baseline and doctor’s diagnosis of incident hypertension. We analyzed individual PCPs and four product groups (i.e., beauty, everyday hair, hygiene, and skincare products). Among product groups, latent class analyses were used to identify PCP usage patterns (“infrequent”, “moderate”, or “frequent”). Multivariable Cox regression was used to estimate the associations between PCPs and hypertension risk, adjusted for potential confounders. The population attributable risk percentage contrasting “frequent” versus “infrequent” users was calculated using Levin's formula. Results: We found an increasing dose-response relationship between beauty products and incident hypertension (p-trend<0.0001; Table 1), with frequent users having a significantly higher risk compared with infrequent users (Hazard Ratio (HR)=1.11 (95% confidence intervals (CI):1.05,1.16)). A similar dose-response relationship was found for hygiene products (p-trend<0.0001), with elevated risks observed in moderate (HR=1.07 (95%CI:1.01,1.13) and frequent (HR=1.13 (95%CI:1.08,1.19) users. An estimated 6.1% and 5.8% reduction in hypertension incidence would be observed among U.S. women with decreased use of beauty and hygiene products, respectively. Our findings were largely consistent across different subgroups defined by age, menopausal status, race, and socioeconomic status. The use of several individual everyday hair and skincare products was associated with increased risk of hypertension; however, latent classes of either everyday hair or skincare product use were not. Conclusions: We found that use of certain PCPs contribute to future development of hypertension, a strong but modifiable risk factor for most cardiovascular diseases. Our findings support the need to identify the pathogenic constituents of PCPs that drive hypertension risk.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
National Institutes of Health (US), National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.